Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):e25-31. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr225. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
The combination of aortic 'no-touch' off-pump surgery (OPCAB) and total arterial revascularization (TAR) can reduce peri-procedural morbidity and yields excellent long-term outcomes albeit at a reported risk of incomplete revascularization. The feasibility of OPCAB-TAR with specific regards to the complete revascularization (CR) in patients with multi-vessel disease was evaluated.
From 2003 to 2010, 712 patients underwent TAR including 526 patients who had OPCAB-TAR and 186 patients who received on-pump TAR [(ONCAB grafting (ONCABG)-TAR)]. Of these, 52% (n = 272; OPCAB) vs. 83% (n = 155; ONCABG) had triple-vessel disease (TVD). To balance patient characteristics, a non-parsimonious, propensity score (PS) model was applied. Endpoints evaluated were mortality, stroke, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). To evaluate CR, an 'Index of CR' (ICOR) was calculated, defined as the number of distal anastomoses divided by the number of the diseased coronary vessels. CR was assumed when the following requirements were fulfilled: the number of distal anastomoses was equal to or higher than that of diseased vessels (ICOR ≥ 1), and all affected coronary territories (left anterior descending, circumflex artery and/or right coronary artery) were grafted.
Mortality was comparable between groups, whereas OPCAB patients suffered from significantly decreased rates of MACCE [3.0 vs. 7.0%; propensity-adjusted odd ratio (PAOR) = 0.24; confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.08-0.66; P = 0.006] including a clear trend towards reduced stroke and myocardial infarction. In the subgroup with TVD, OPCAB patients presented with significantly reduced rates for MACCE (1.8 vs. 5.8%; PAOR = 0.07; CI 95% 0.01-0.65; P = 0.02), including a significantly lower rate for stroke. For all-comers, the number of diseased vessels was lower after OPCAB (2.36 ± 0.73 vs. 2.87 ± 0.39; P < 0.001) and consequently, these patients received an overall lower number of distal anastomoses (2.42 ± 1.15 vs. 3.06 ± 0.98; P < 0.001). Although the ICOR was slightly lower (1.04 ± 0.37 vs. 1.07 ± 0.37; P = 0.02), CR was achieved more frequently in OPCAB patients (82.1 vs. 73.1%; P = 0.01). In the subgroup with TVD, the number of distal anastomoses (2.99 ± 1.14 vs. 3.10 ± 0.98; P = 0.19) and the ICOR (1.00 ± 0.38 vs. 1.03 ± 0.33; P = 0.19) was comparable between groups. The frequency of CR was slightly higher (75 vs. 67.7%; P = 0.11), and the proportion of complete in situ grafting was significantly higher after OPCAB (37.1 vs. 23.9%; P = 0.005).
Aortic 'no-touch' OPCAB-TAR leads to a significant reduction of MACCE. It does not compromise CR in patients with TVD and thus can be safely applied to these patients.
主动脉“无接触”不停跳心脏手术(OPCAB)与全动脉血运重建(TAR)的联合应用可以降低围手术期发病率,并获得良好的长期结果,尽管有不完全血运重建的报道风险。评估多血管疾病患者中 OP-CAB-TAR 与特定完全血运重建(CR)的可行性。
2003 年至 2010 年,712 例患者接受了 TAR,其中 526 例患者接受了 OPCAB-TAR,186 例患者接受了体外循环 TAR(ONCAB 移植(ONCABG)-TAR)。其中,52%(n=272;OPCAB)与 83%(n=155;ONCABG)患有三血管疾病(TVD)。为了平衡患者特征,应用了非简约、倾向评分(PS)模型。评估的终点是死亡率、中风、主要不良心脏和脑血管事件(MACCE)。为了评估 CR,计算了“CR 指数”(ICOR),定义为远端吻合口数量除以病变冠状动脉数量。当满足以下要求时,认为达到了 CR:远端吻合口数量等于或高于病变血管数量(ICOR≥1),并且所有受影响的冠状动脉区域(前降支、回旋支和/或右冠状动脉)都进行了移植。
两组死亡率相当,而 OPCAB 患者的 MACCE 发生率明显降低[3.0%对 7.0%;倾向调整后的比值比(PAOR)=0.24;置信区间(CI)95%0.08-0.66;P=0.006],包括中风和心肌梗死的发生率明显降低。在 TVD 亚组中,OPCAB 患者的 MACCE 发生率明显降低(1.8%对 5.8%;PAOR=0.07;CI 95%0.01-0.65;P=0.02),包括中风发生率明显降低。对于所有患者,OPCAB 后病变血管数量较低(2.36±0.73 对 2.87±0.39;P<0.001),因此这些患者接受的远端吻合口数量总体较低(2.42±1.15 对 3.06±0.98;P<0.001)。尽管 ICOR 略低(1.04±0.37 对 1.07±0.37;P=0.02),但 OPCAB 患者的 CR 更常见(82.1%对 73.1%;P=0.01)。在 TVD 亚组中,远端吻合口数量(2.99±1.14 对 3.10±0.98;P=0.19)和 ICOR(1.00±0.38 对 1.03±0.33;P=0.19)在两组之间无差异。CR 的频率略高(75%对 67.7%;P=0.11),OPCAB 后完全原位移植的比例明显更高(37.1%对 23.9%;P=0.005)。
主动脉“无接触”OPCAB-TAR 可显著降低 MACCE。它不会影响 TVD 患者的 CR,因此可以安全地应用于这些患者。