Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts 01199, USA.
J Nephrol. 2012 Nov-Dec;25(6):962-8. doi: 10.5301/jn.5000076.
Volume management remains a challenging component of caring for the critically ill. Renal failure complicates fluid management. We sought to identify relationships between delta blood volume and physiology-based targets for both the adequacy of left ventricular filling (stroke volume index [SVI]) and preload dependency (stroke volume variability [SVV]) in patients undergoing dialysis in the intensive care unit.
Patients undergoing dialysis with an arterial line in place were eligible. Delta blood volume was measured during dialysis along with simultaneous SVI and SVV via an arterial pressure cardiac output monitor. Patients were dichotomized as "negative" fluid strategy if fluid was removed, or "positive" fluid strategy if fluid was added during renal replacement therapy. Delta blood volume's association with SVI and SVV was examined separately by fluid strategy group.
A total of 26 patients (11 continuous and 15 intermittent dialysis) were investigated. Compared with that in patients with negative fluid strategy, SVV was significantly higher at baseline in patients with positive fluid strategy, while baseline SVI was significantly lower. Fluid removal was associated with significant increases to SVV in both strategy groups. Fluid removal was associated with significant decreases to SVI, and this effect was similar regardless of fluid strategy.
Physiologic variables assessing cardiac performance (SVI) and preload responsiveness (SVV) provide simple yet meaningful targets when one is determining the best approach for volume management in critically ill patients undergoing dialysis.
容量管理仍然是危重病护理的一个具有挑战性的组成部分。肾衰竭使液体管理复杂化。我们试图确定在重症监护病房接受透析的患者的血容量变化与基于生理学的左心室充盈(每搏量指数[SVI])和前负荷依赖性(每搏量变异度[SVV])目标之间的关系。
符合条件的患者需要有动脉导管。通过动脉压力心输出量监测仪,在透析过程中测量血容量变化,同时测量 SVI 和 SVV。如果在肾脏替代治疗期间去除液体,则将患者分为“负液策略”,如果添加液体,则将患者分为“正液策略”。分别通过液体策略组检查血容量变化与 SVI 和 SVV 的关联。
共调查了 26 名患者(11 名连续透析和 15 名间歇性透析)。与负液策略患者相比,正液策略患者的 SVV 基线明显更高,而 SVI 基线明显更低。在两个策略组中,液体去除均与 SVV 显著增加相关。液体去除与 SVI 显著降低相关,而无论液体策略如何,这种影响都是相似的。
当确定接受透析的危重病患者最佳容量管理方法时,评估心脏功能(SVI)和前负荷反应性(SVV)的生理变量提供了简单而有意义的目标。