Suppr超能文献

抗议者是“充满激情的经济学家”:一种应对集体劣势的动态双重途径应对模式。

Protesters as "passionate economists": a dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage.

机构信息

University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 May;16(2):180-99. doi: 10.1177/1088868311430835. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

Abstract

To explain the psychology behind individuals' motivation to participate in collective action against collective disadvantage (e.g., protest marches), the authors introduce a dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping that integrates many common explanations of collective action (i.e., group identity, unfairness, anger, social support, and efficacy). It conceptualizes collective action as the outcome of two distinct processes: emotion-focused and problem-focused approach coping. The former revolves around the experience of group-based anger (based in appraised external blame for unfair collective disadvantage). The latter revolves around beliefs in the group's efficacy (based in appraised instrumental coping potential for social change). The model is the first to make explicit the dynamic nature of collective action by explaining how undertaking collective action leads to the reappraisal of collective disadvantage, thus inspiring future collective action. The authors review empirical support for the model, discuss its theoretical and practical implications, and identify directions for future research and application.

摘要

为了解释个人参与集体行动以对抗集体劣势(例如抗议游行)的动机背后的心理学,作者引入了一种动态的双重途径应对模型,该模型整合了许多常见的集体行动解释(即群体认同、不公平、愤怒、社会支持和效能)。它将集体行动概念化为两个不同过程的结果:以情绪为中心的应对和以问题为中心的应对。前者围绕着基于群体的愤怒体验(基于对不公平的集体劣势的外部指责)。后者围绕着对群体效能的信念(基于对社会变革的工具性应对潜力的评价)。该模型通过解释采取集体行动如何导致对集体劣势的重新评估,从而激发未来的集体行动,首次明确了集体行动的动态性质。作者回顾了对该模型的实证支持,讨论了其理论和实际意义,并确定了未来研究和应用的方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验