Baumohl J
Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA, Canada.
Br J Addict. 1990 Sep;85(9):1187-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1990.tb03444.x.
This paper analyses two contemporaneous types of 19th-century North American inebriate institutions and attempts by their promoters to develop a public treatment system. Inebriate 'homes' or 'retreats' descended from a tradition of therapeutic temperance that originated in the Washingtonian Movement of the 1840s. They were small, urban, private and charitable, dedicated to voluntaristic and Christian principles, and were intimately connected with local temperance groups that provided support after residential treatment. Inebriate asylums took inspiration from insane asylums and were large, public, coercive and isolated in rural areas. Their promoters were steeped in the deterministic, hereditarian neurologism of Victorian psychiatry. Asylum enthusiasts dominated the public treatment movement, but developed a largely disciplinary and custodial vision that undermined their political appeal. As inebriate asylums could not easily be distinguished from insane asylums, almshouses or jails, legislators regarded them as superfluous and very few were established. Prohibition destroyed what public inebriate institutions existed. Inebriate colonies, usually connected with county jails, were the only survivors of the 19th-century treatment movement apart from private sanitaria and a few inebriate wards in city or county hospitals.
本文分析了19世纪北美两种同期的戒酒机构,以及它们的推动者为建立公共治疗体系所做的努力。戒酒“之家”或“康复所”源自19世纪40年代华盛顿运动中兴起的治疗性戒酒传统。它们规模较小,位于城市,属于私人慈善机构,遵循自愿和基督教原则,并与当地戒酒团体密切相关,这些团体在住院治疗后提供支持。戒酒收容所的灵感来自精神病院,规模较大,面向公众,具有强制性,且位于农村地区,与世隔绝。其推动者深受维多利亚时代精神病学中决定论、遗传神经学的影响。收容所的支持者主导了公共治疗运动,但他们的愿景在很大程度上是纪律性和监管性的,这削弱了其政治吸引力。由于戒酒收容所难以与精神病院、救济院或监狱区分开来,立法者认为它们是多余的,因此很少有戒酒收容所得以建立。禁酒令摧毁了现有的公共戒酒机构。除了私人疗养院以及城市或县医院中的一些戒酒病房外,通常与县监狱相关的戒酒殖民地是19世纪治疗运动的唯一幸存者。