• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大麻依赖的年轻成年人中,有无反社会人格障碍患者在治疗结果上的差异。

Differences in treatment outcome among marijuana-dependent young adults with and without antisocial personality disorder.

机构信息

Division of Substance Abuse, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.

出版信息

Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2012 Jul;38(4):305-13. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2011.643989. Epub 2012 Jan 13.

DOI:10.3109/00952990.2011.643989
PMID:22242558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3633215/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have addressed comorbid antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and marijuana dependence in young adults, and results from previous studies are inconsistent.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated differences in pretreatment characteristics and treatment outcomes between marijuana-dependent young adults with and without ASPD.

METHODS

Data for this study were derived from a randomized trial, in which marijuana-dependent young adults (n = 136) between 18 and 25 years of age were randomized to four behavioral conditions: (1) MET/CBT with CM, (2) MET/CBT without CM, (3) DC with CM, and (4) DC without CM.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent of the participants met DSM-IV-TR criteria for ASPD. ASPD clients had significantly more lifetime alcohol dependence disorders, marijuana use in the 28 days pretreatment, arrests, and assault and weapon charges compared to those without ASPD. ASPD clients did not differ in retention or substance use outcomes at 8 weeks posttreatment or the 6-month follow-up. In general, both groups had more attendance in the voucher condition, but there were no significant ASPD by treatment interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that marijuana-dependent young adults with comorbid ASPD do not necessarily have poorer retention or substance use outcomes compared with marijuana-dependent young adults who do not have ASPD when treated in a well-defined behavioral therapy protocol.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

Previous research has shown increased risks for clients with comorbid ASPD and marijuana dependence; however, our findings suggest that specialized programs for clients with ASPD may not be necessary if they are provided with empirically supported, structured treatments.

摘要

背景

很少有研究涉及年轻成年人中同时存在的共病反社会人格障碍(ASPD)和大麻依赖,并且之前的研究结果不一致。

目的

本研究评估了有和没有 ASPD 的大麻依赖年轻成年人在治疗前特征和治疗结果方面的差异。

方法

本研究的数据来自一项随机试验,其中年龄在 18 至 25 岁之间的大麻依赖年轻成年人(n = 136)被随机分配到四个行为条件:(1)MET/CBT 加 CM,(2)MET/CBT 不加 CM,(3)DC 加 CM,和(4)DC 不加 CM。

结果

44%的参与者符合 DSM-IV-TR 中 ASPD 的标准。与没有 ASPD 的人相比,ASPD 患者有更多的终生酒精依赖障碍、治疗前 28 天的大麻使用、逮捕和攻击以及武器指控。ASPD 患者在 8 周治疗后或 6 个月随访时的保留率或物质使用结果没有差异。一般来说,两组在凭证条件下的出勤率都更高,但没有出现显著的 ASPD 与治疗的相互作用。

结论

这些数据表明,在明确的行为治疗方案中,与没有 ASPD 的大麻依赖年轻成年人相比,同时患有共病 ASPD 的大麻依赖年轻成年人的保留率或物质使用结果不一定更差。

科学意义

之前的研究表明,同时患有 ASPD 和大麻依赖的患者风险增加;然而,我们的发现表明,如果为 ASPD 患者提供经验证支持的结构化治疗,可能不需要为他们提供专门的项目。

相似文献

1
Differences in treatment outcome among marijuana-dependent young adults with and without antisocial personality disorder.大麻依赖的年轻成年人中,有无反社会人格障碍患者在治疗结果上的差异。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2012 Jul;38(4):305-13. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2011.643989. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
2
Chronological relationship between antisocial personality disorder and alcohol dependence.反社会人格障碍与酒精依赖之间的时间关系。
Eur Addict Res. 2002 Nov;8(4):195-200. doi: 10.1159/000066132.
3
Lifetime comorbidity of antisocial personality disorder and anxiety disorders among adults in the community.社区成年人中反社会人格障碍与焦虑症的终生共病情况。
Psychiatry Res. 2003 Feb 15;117(2):159-66. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(02)00320-7.
4
Comorbid trajectories of substance use as predictors of Antisocial Personality Disorder, Major Depressive Episode, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder.物质使用的共病轨迹作为反社会人格障碍、重度抑郁发作和广泛性焦虑症的预测因素。
Addict Behav. 2016 Nov;62:114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
5
Antisocial behavioral syndromes and DSM-IV alcohol use disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.反社会行为综合征与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版酒精使用障碍:酒精及相关状况全国流行病学调查结果
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 May;31(5):814-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00364.x. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
6
Antisocial behavioral syndromes and DSM-IV drug use disorders in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.美国的反社会行为综合征与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中的药物使用障碍:酒精及相关状况全国流行病学调查结果
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Oct 8;90(2-3):145-58. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.02.023. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
7
Conduct disorder and antisocial personality disorder in persons with severe psychiatric and substance use disorders.患有严重精神疾病和物质使用障碍者的品行障碍和反社会人格障碍
Schizophr Bull. 2006 Oct;32(4):626-36. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbj068. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
8
The cost-effectiveness of four treatments for marijuana dependence.四种大麻依赖治疗方法的成本效益
Addiction. 2007 Sep;102(9):1443-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01909.x. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
9
Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder.反社会型人格障碍的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16(6):CD007668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007668.pub2.
10
Antisocial behavioral syndromes in cocaine and cannabis dependence.可卡因和大麻依赖中的反社会行为综合征
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2008;34(4):405-14. doi: 10.1080/00952990802122473.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder.反社会人格障碍的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 3;9(9):CD007668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007668.pub3.
2
Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder.针对大麻使用障碍的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 5;2016(5):CD005336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub4.
3
Incentivizing health care behaviors in emerging adults: a systematic review.激励青年成年人的医疗保健行为:一项系统综述。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Mar 24;10:371-81. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S102574. eCollection 2016.
4
The impact of personality disorders on legally supervised community treatment: a systematic literature review.人格障碍对法定监督社区治疗的影响:一项系统的文献综述。
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Aug;50(6):664-72. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9649-8. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Making consent more informed: preliminary results from a multiple-choice test among probation-referred marijuana users entering a randomized clinical trial.使知情同意更具实质性:针对进入随机临床试验的缓刑期大麻使用者进行的多项选择题测试的初步结果。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(3):354-9.
2
The interactive effects of antisocial personality disorder and court-mandated status on substance abuse treatment dropout.反社会人格障碍与法庭强制状态对药物滥用治疗中断的交互作用。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Mar;34(2):157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.02.007. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
3
Treatment retention and outcome among cocaine-dependent patients with and without active criminal justice involvement.有和没有积极刑事司法介入的可卡因依赖患者的治疗保留率和治疗结果。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007;35(1):83-91.
4
The use of contingency management and motivational/skills-building therapy to treat young adults with marijuana dependence.使用应急管理和动机/技能培养疗法治疗大麻依赖的年轻成年人。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Oct;74(5):955-66. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.955.
5
Motivational enhancement therapy for adolescent marijuana users: a preliminary randomized controlled trial.针对青少年大麻使用者的动机增强疗法:一项初步随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Jun;74(3):628-32. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.628.
6
Antisocial personality disorder is associated with increased severity of gambling, medical, drug and psychiatric problems among treatment-seeking pathological gamblers.反社会型人格障碍与寻求治疗的病态赌徒在赌博、医疗、药物和精神问题方面的严重程度增加有关。
Addiction. 2005 Aug;100(8):1183-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01151.x.
7
Impulsivity, negative expectancies, and marijuana use: a test of the acquired preparedness model.冲动性、消极预期与大麻使用:习得性准备模型的一项检验
Addict Behav. 2005 Jun;30(5):1071-6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.11.003. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
8
Substance use disorder patients who are mandated to treatment: characteristics, treatment process, and 1- and 5-year outcomes.被强制接受治疗的物质使用障碍患者:特征、治疗过程以及1年和5年的治疗结果。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005 Apr;28(3):213-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.10.014.
9
Trajectories of marijuana use from adolescence to young adulthood: predictors and outcomes.从青少年到青年期的大麻使用轨迹:预测因素与结果
Dev Psychopathol. 2004 Fall;16(4):1007-27. doi: 10.1017/s0954579404040118.
10
Multisystemic therapy: a treatment for violent substance-abusing and substance-dependent juvenile offenders.多系统疗法:一种针对滥用药物和药物依赖的暴力少年罪犯的治疗方法。
Addict Behav. 2003 Dec;28(9):1731-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.045.