Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arthroscopy. 2012 Feb;28(2):283-93. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.09.019.
The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the results of surgical treatments for chronic retrocalcaneal bursitis (RB).
Medline, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Embase, and the Cochrane Library (1945 to December 2010) were systematically searched for the following terms: calcaneal AND (prominence OR exostosis) OR ((retrocalcaneal OR calcan()) AND (burs() OR exosto() OR prominence)) OR Haglund[tw] OR Haglund's[tw] OR ((retrocalcaneal OR calcan()) AND (ostectom() OR osteotom() OR resect(*))). Therapeutic studies on 10 or more subjects with RB were eligible. Quality was assessed by use of the GRADE scale and Downs and Black scale.
Of 876 reviewed abstracts, 15 trials met our inclusion criteria evaluating 547 procedures in 461 patients. Twelve trials reported an open surgical technique; three studies evaluated endoscopic techniques. Differences in patient satisfaction favored the endoscopic technique. The complication rate differed substantially, favoring endoscopic surgery over open surgery.
There are many different surgical techniques to treat RB. Regardless of technique, resecting sufficient bone is essential for a good outcome. Even though the level of evidence of included studies is relatively low, it can be concluded that endoscopic surgery is superior to open intervention for RB. More evidence is a necessity to be more conclusive regarding the best surgical treatment.
Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
本系统回顾分析了慢性跟骨后滑囊炎(RB)的手术治疗结果。
系统检索 Medline、CINAHL( Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature )、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆(1945 年至 2010 年 12 月),检索词包括:跟骨和(隆凸或骨赘)或(跟骨后或跟骨()和滑囊炎()或骨赘)或 Haglund[tw]或 Haglund's[tw]或(跟骨后或跟骨(*)和(骨切除术或骨切开术或切除术))。纳入标准为 10 例以上 RB 患者的治疗性研究。使用 GRADE 量表和 Downs 和 Black 量表评估质量。
在 876 篇综述摘要中,有 15 项试验符合纳入标准,评估了 461 例患者的 547 例手术。12 项试验报告了开放性手术技术;3 项研究评估了内镜技术。患者满意度的差异有利于内镜技术。并发症发生率差异很大,内镜手术优于开放性手术。
有许多不同的手术技术可以治疗 RB。无论采用何种技术,切除足够的骨是获得良好结果的关键。尽管纳入研究的证据水平相对较低,但可以得出结论,内镜手术优于开放性手术干预 RB。需要更多的证据来更明确地确定最佳的手术治疗方法。
IV 级,对 III 级和 IV 级研究的系统评价。