Suppr超能文献

白细胞介素2与淋巴因子激活的杀伤细胞疗法:大剂量白细胞介素2与持续输注白细胞介素2方案的分析

Interleukin 2 and lymphokine-activated killer cell therapy: analysis of a bolus interleukin 2 and a continuous infusion interleukin 2 regimen.

作者信息

Clark J W, Smith J W, Steis R G, Urba W J, Crum E, Miller R, McKnight J, Beman J, Stevenson H C, Creekmore S

机构信息

Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

出版信息

Cancer Res. 1990 Nov 15;50(22):7343-50.

PMID:2224862
Abstract

Several groups have described the efficacy of interleukin 2 (IL-2) plus lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells in the treatment of cancer patients with significant response rates noted in patients with renal cell cancer and malignant melanoma; however, the optimum regimen remains undefined. The Biological Response Modifiers Program of the National Cancer Institute conducted two consecutive Phase I/II studies evaluating the toxicity and clinical efficacy of different methods of IL-2 and LAK cell therapy. In the first trial, we modified the standard Rosenberg regimen by decreasing the duration of priming in an attempt to reduce the toxicity related to this phase of the therapy and thereby administer more IL-2 doses with the LAK cells. In the second trial, we used a continuous i.v. infusion IL-2 regimen and altered both the leukapheresis procedure and the LAK cell culture techniques based on our in vitro and preclinical studies suggesting that 2-day LAK cells were superior. Thirty cancer patients received i.v. bolus IL-2 at 100,000 units/kg every 8 h for 3 days during priming and for 5 days during LAK cell administration. A second group of 22 cancer patients received IL-2 by continuous i.v. infusion at 3 x 10(6) units/m2 for 5 days during priming and an additional 5 days of IL-2 with the LAK cell phase of the treatment. The timing of the start of the leukapheresis procedures, their duration and number, and the LAK cell culture techniques differed in the two trials. Overall, 52 patients with various cancers were treated. The toxicities associated with each regimen were similar to those seen in other IL-2 plus LAK cell trials. Four patients (one each with melanoma and diffuse large cell lymphoma and two with renal cell cancer) exhibited partial responses lasting 2, 4, 10, and 15+ mo. Serial tumor biopsies from treated patients demonstrated that therapy can produce a marked mononuclear cell infiltrate and an increase in HLA-DR expression on tumor cells. There was no difference in the overall response rate between the two regimens, but toxicity was less with continuous i.v. infusion IL-2. The 5-day continuous i.v. infusion regimen resulted in significantly higher rebound lymphocytosis, cell yield from leukapheresis, and number of LAK cells harvested from culture.

摘要

几个研究小组描述了白细胞介素2(IL-2)加淋巴因子激活的杀伤细胞(LAK)在治疗癌症患者中的疗效,在肾细胞癌和恶性黑色素瘤患者中观察到显著的缓解率;然而,最佳方案仍未确定。美国国立癌症研究所的生物反应调节剂项目进行了两项连续的I/II期研究,评估不同方法的IL-2和LAK细胞疗法的毒性和临床疗效。在第一项试验中,我们修改了标准的罗森伯格方案,缩短了启动期的持续时间,试图降低与该治疗阶段相关的毒性,从而在LAK细胞治疗时给予更多剂量的IL-2。在第二项试验中,我们采用了持续静脉输注IL-2方案,并根据我们的体外和临床前研究改变了白细胞分离程序和LAK细胞培养技术,研究表明培养2天的LAK细胞更优。30名癌症患者在启动期每8小时静脉推注100000单位/千克的IL-2,共3天,在LAK细胞给药期间持续5天。第二组22名癌症患者在启动期通过持续静脉输注3×10⁶单位/平方米的IL-2,共5天,并在LAK细胞治疗阶段额外给予5天的IL-2。两项试验中白细胞分离程序开始的时间、持续时间和次数以及LAK细胞培养技术有所不同。总体而言,52名患有各种癌症的患者接受了治疗。与每种方案相关的毒性与其他IL-2加LAK细胞试验中观察到的毒性相似。4名患者(1例黑色素瘤、1例弥漫性大细胞淋巴瘤和2例肾细胞癌)出现部分缓解,持续时间分别为2、4、10和15多个月。对接受治疗患者的系列肿瘤活检表明,治疗可产生明显的单核细胞浸润,并使肿瘤细胞上的HLA-DR表达增加。两种方案的总体缓解率没有差异,但持续静脉输注IL-2的毒性较小。5天持续静脉输注方案导致明显更高的反弹性淋巴细胞增多、白细胞分离的细胞产量以及从培养物中收获的LAK细胞数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验