Influence of schedule of interleukin 2 administration on therapy with interleukin 2 and lymphokine activated killer cells.

The purpose of this study was to compare the toxicity, immunomodulatory changes, and antitumor efficacy of interleukin 2 (IL-2) and lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cell therapy with two durations of IL-2 infusion. Patients with progressive melanoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, renal carcinoma, or colon carcinoma received IL-2 at 3 X 10(6) units/m2/day on days 1-5 and 13-17, either by bolus injection every 8 h (q8h) or by continuous i.v. (CIV) administration. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were harvested by leukapheresis on days 8, 9, and 10, were incubated in vitro for 5 days for generation of LAK cells, and were infused on days 13, 14, and 15. The first 11 patients were treated with IL-2 q8h, and the subsequent 13 patients were treated by CIV infusion. Toxicity consisted primarily of fever, chills, emesis, diarrhea, weight gain, and edema but did not require intensive care unit support and did not differ significantly between treatment groups. IL-2-induced lymphocytosis on day 8 was higher with CIV than with q8h administration with a mean lymphocyte count/microliter of 5610 +/- 700 (SE) versus 3300 +/- 500. Immunomodulatory changes observed on days 8 and 20 were also greater with CIV IL-2 and included an increase in peripheral blood mononuclear cell IL-2 receptor expression as well as a marked rise in the number of Leu-11+ and Leu-19+ peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The total leukapheresis yield per patient and total number of LAK cells infused per patient were higher with CIV than q8h administration, with 49.8 +/- 4.9 X 10(9) versus 39.4 +/- 5.4 X 10(9) and 42.6 +/- 5.0 X 10(9) versus 34.0 +/- 5.4 X 10(9), respectively. The cells infused displayed phenotypic evidence of activation and exhibited marked lytic reactivity to Daudi, Raji, and HT-144 targets. One complete and one minimal response were observed in 2 of 8 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received CIV IL-2 and LAK cells. The results show that IL-2 is more biologically active by CIV than q8h administration, as demonstrated by greater rebound lymphocytosis, LAK cell yield, and in vivo immunostimulation.