Centre for Physiotherapy Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Mar;19(3):423-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.09.011. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
The diagnostic value and reliability of selected neurological clinical tests was studied in control subjects with normal neuroimaging (n=42), and subjects with a focal brain lesion (n=38). The items were studied by two examiners blinded to group membership and using standardized protocols, and subsequently by a neurologist who was not blinded to diagnosis. The positive likelihood ratios ranged from 1.06 (pronator drift) to 22.11 (single leg stance with eyes open, while the negative likelihood ratios ranged from 0.47 (tandem gait) to 0.97 (pupil symmetry). Three items (single leg stance - eyes closed - firm surface; single leg stance - eyes open - foam surface; and tandem gait) successfully distinguished between the two groups (odds ratio p<0.05). The inter-rater reliability was generally poor, with only tandem gait showing excellent agreement (kappa [K]=0.92). Tandem gait was the only item to show noteworthy agreement (K=0.93) between the examiners and the neurologist. The tests varied considerably in their ability to detect radiologically demonstrated structural brain lesions, and several items were poorly reproducible, questioning their value as part of a routine neurological examination.
研究了 42 名神经影像学正常的对照组受试者和 38 名有局灶性脑损伤受试者的神经科临床检查的诊断价值和可靠性。这些项目由两名检查者在不知道组别的情况下使用标准化方案进行研究,然后由一名不了解诊断的神经科医生进行研究。阳性似然比的范围从 1.06(旋前漂移)到 22.11(睁眼单腿站立),而阴性似然比的范围从 0.47(串联步态)到 0.97(瞳孔对称)。有三个项目(闭眼单腿站立-坚实表面;睁眼单腿站立-泡沫表面;串联步态)成功地区分了两组(优势比 p<0.05)。评分者间的可靠性普遍较差,只有串联步态显示出极好的一致性(kappa [K]=0.92)。只有串联步态在检查者和神经科医生之间显示出显著的一致性(K=0.93)。这些检查在检测放射学显示的结构性脑损伤方面的能力差异很大,而且一些项目的重复性较差,这使得它们作为常规神经检查的一部分的价值受到质疑。