Southern Health Emergency Medicine and Toxicology Research Group, Southern Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria.
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2012 Sep;31(9):955-63. doi: 10.1177/0960327111433182. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
Levosimendan (Levo) is an inodilator improving cardiac output (CO) and reducing afterload in heart failure. Previously, we reported that Levo improved CO but not blood pressure (BP) in a rodent model of verapamil poisoning. We theorised that Levo-induced vasodilation should not influence BP to a similar degree in metoprolol poisoning.
To assess the effect of Levo on haemodynamics in a rodent model of metoprolol poisoning.
Anaesthetized male Wistar rats were infused metoprolol continuously. When the BP dropped to 50% of baseline (time 0) rats received 1 of the 4 treatments: (a) control (0.9% saline bolus + infusion); (b) Levo-l (Levo 36 μm/kg loading dose followed by 0.6 μm/kg/min); (c) Levo-I (Levo infusion only at 0.6 μm/kg/min); and (d) Epi (epinephrine 0.5 μm/kg/min). All groups received comparable fluid volumes. Haemodynamics were recorded every 10 min for 70 min. CO, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of each group were compared to the control.
All groups had comparable baseline and time 0 HR, MAP and CO. Levo-L and Levo-I rats showed significantly greater CO at t = 10 min (p > 0.02 and p > 0.04, respectively). CO was higher at all other time points for both Levo groups. This was not statistically significant. Levo did not improve MAP compared to control. Adrenaline increased MAP but not CO compared to control and Levo groups.
Levo did not improve MAP but moderately improved CO compared to control in this model of metoprolol poisoning. The response was similar to that reported previously in verapamil-poisoned rats. The improvement in MAP seen with epinephrine was most likely vasoconstriction mediated.
评估左西孟旦在美托洛尔中毒的啮齿动物模型中对血流动力学的影响。
麻醉雄性 Wistar 大鼠连续输注美托洛尔。当血压降至基线的 50%(时间 0)时,大鼠接受以下 4 种治疗之一:(a)对照组(0.9%生理盐水推注+输注);(b)左西孟旦-l(左西孟旦 36 μm/kg 负荷剂量,随后 0.6 μm/kg/min);(c)左西孟旦-I(仅 0.6 μm/kg/min 输注);和(d)肾上腺素(肾上腺素 0.5 μm/kg/min)。所有组均接受相当的液体量。记录血流动力学每 10 分钟一次,持续 70 分钟。与对照组相比,比较每组的心输出量(CO)、平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)。
所有组的基线和时间 0 HR、MAP 和 CO 均具有可比性。左西孟旦-l 和左西孟旦-I 大鼠在 t = 10 min 时显示出显著更高的 CO(分别为 p > 0.02 和 p > 0.04)。在所有其他时间点,左西孟旦组的 CO 均更高。但这没有统计学意义。与对照组相比,左西孟旦并未改善 MAP。肾上腺素升高 MAP,但与对照组和左西孟旦组相比,并未升高 CO。
与对照组相比,左西孟旦在美托洛尔中毒模型中并未改善 MAP,但适度改善 CO。这种反应与之前在维拉帕米中毒大鼠中报告的反应相似。肾上腺素引起的 MAP 改善很可能是血管收缩介导的。