• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[观察性研究的报告:使用STROBE声明进行分析]

[The reporting of observational studies: analysis using the STROBE statement].

作者信息

Galera Llorca Jordi, Lahoz Grillo Raquel, Roig Loscertales Francesc

机构信息

Health Outcomes Research, Novartis Farmacéutica, Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2011 Dec;85(6):583-91. doi: 10.1590/S1135-57272011120000007.

DOI:10.1590/S1135-57272011120000007
PMID:22249589
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deficiencies detected in biomedical studies publication different Guidelines to improve. The objective of the study is to assess the communication of observational studies of Cardiovascular and Metabolism therapeutic area (CVM) published in 6 Spanish journals in 2009 using the STROBE statement.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of articles related to CVM therapeutic area, published during 2009 in 6 Spanish journals applying the 34 items of the STROBE statement. Descriptive analysis of the results for qualitative variables was performed using a frequency analysis. Quantitative variables were analyzed by sample estimates and dispersion. A comparative analysis of journals was performed using ANOVA with a statistical significance of p<0.05.

RESULTS

Throughout 2009, 74 CVM observational studies were published in the evaluated journals. The most frequent design were cohorts 45 (60.8%) and cross-sectional 28 (37.8%). The study main objective was on pathology 55 (74.3%), followed by drug and non-pharmacological interventions 15 (20.3%) and diagnosis 4 (5.4%). The mean of complied items was 20 on 34 (DE±3.7), with a maximum of 24 (DE±2) in Gaceta Sanitaria and a minimum of 19 (DE±2.8) in Hipertensión.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluated papers comply with slightly more than a half items (58%) of the STROBE recommendations. The Methods and Results sections showed more deficiencies.

摘要

背景

生物医学研究出版物中发现存在不足,需要不同的指南来改进。本研究的目的是使用STROBE声明评估2009年发表在6种西班牙期刊上的心血管和代谢治疗领域(CVM)观察性研究的报告情况。

方法

对2009年发表在6种西班牙期刊上的与CVM治疗领域相关的文章进行横断面分析,应用STROBE声明的34项内容。对定性变量的结果进行描述性分析时采用频率分析。对定量变量进行样本估计和离散分析。使用方差分析对期刊进行比较分析,统计学显著性为p<0.05。

结果

2009年全年,在评估的期刊上发表了74项CVM观察性研究。最常见的设计是队列研究45项(60.8%)和横断面研究28项(37.8%)。研究的主要目的是病理学55项(74.3%),其次是药物和非药物干预15项(20.3%)以及诊断4项(5.4%)。符合的项目平均为34项中的20项(均值±3.7),《卫生公报》中最多为24项(均值±2),《高血压》中最少为19项(均值±2.8)。

结论

评估的论文符合STROBE建议略多于一半的项目(58%)。方法和结果部分显示出更多不足。

相似文献

1
[The reporting of observational studies: analysis using the STROBE statement].[观察性研究的报告:使用STROBE声明进行分析]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2011 Dec;85(6):583-91. doi: 10.1590/S1135-57272011120000007.
2
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE):解释与详述
Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):805-35. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511.
3
[Use of multiple regression models in observational studies (1970-2013) and requirements of the STROBE guidelines in Spanish scientific journals].[1970 - 2013年观察性研究中多元回归模型的使用及西班牙科学期刊中STROBE指南的要求]
Semergen. 2016 Nov-Dec;42(8):523-529. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
4
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
5
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):800-4. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654.
6
The reporting of observational research studies in dermatology journals: a literature-based study.皮肤病学期刊中观察性研究的报告:一项基于文献的研究。
Arch Dermatol. 2010 May;146(5):534-41. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.87.
7
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.流行病学观察性研究报告强化声明(STROBE):解释与详述
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):W163-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1.
8
STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology--Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE statement.加强观察性研究在流行病学中的报告——分子流行病学(STROBE-ME):STROBE 声明的扩展。
Mutagenesis. 2012 Jan;27(1):17-29. doi: 10.1093/mutage/ger039. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
9
STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology - Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE statement.加强流行病学观察性研究报告规范-分子流行病学(STROBE-ME):STROBE 声明的扩展。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2012 Jan;42(1):1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02561.x. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
10
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Nov;85(11):867-72. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.045120.

引用本文的文献

1
Weaknesses in the reporting of cross-sectional studies according to the STROBE statement: the case of metabolic syndrome in adults from Peru.根据STROBE声明,横断面研究报告中的不足:以秘鲁成年人代谢综合征为例。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2015 Dec 30;46(4):168-175.
2
Important statistical points to improve and promote the methodology of the articles on medical sciences, particularly nephrology and kidney; a review article.关于改进和推广医学科学文章,特别是肾脏病学和肾脏相关文章方法学的重要统计学要点;一篇综述文章
J Renal Inj Prev. 2015 Mar 1;4(1):4-8. doi: 10.12861/jrip.2015.02. eCollection 2015.