• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盲视参与者在蒙眼前识别触觉图片时干扰的影响:触觉信息的表示模式。

The effects of interference on recognition of haptic pictures in blindfolded sighted participants: the modality of representation of haptic information.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Carleton University, Canada.

出版信息

Scand J Psychol. 2012 Apr;53(2):112-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00934.x. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00934.x
PMID:22251003
Abstract

Haptic picture recognition was tested in 36 undergraduate students to determine whether haptic representations are visual or multi-modal. Participants explored target haptic pictures and were asked to recognize the target from three alternatives. Each participant completed eight control and eight interference trials in visual, lexical and tactile recognition modalities. For interference, participants were assigned to either an articulatory suppression (repeat "the" at a constant rate) or a visual interference (watch a visual display) condition, to prevent recoding into a verbal or visual code. The results showed that accuracy was higher at control compared to interference trials and for tactile compared to lexical recognition. Additionally, lexical and tactile recognition decreased with articulatory suppression whereas only tactile recognition decreased with visual interference. These findings suggest that haptic pictures may be represented by coordinating visual and verbal codes.

摘要

触觉图片识别在 36 名本科生中进行了测试,以确定触觉表示是视觉的还是多模态的。参与者探索了目标触觉图片,并被要求从三个选项中识别目标。每个参与者在视觉、词汇和触觉识别模式下完成了 8 个控制和 8 个干扰试验。对于干扰,参与者被分配到发音抑制(以恒定的速度重复“the”)或视觉干扰(观看视觉显示)条件下,以防止重新编码为口头或视觉代码。结果表明,在控制试验中,与干扰试验相比,触觉识别的准确性更高,与词汇识别相比,触觉识别的准确性更高。此外,词汇识别和触觉识别随着发音抑制而降低,而只有触觉识别随着视觉干扰而降低。这些发现表明,触觉图片可能通过协调视觉和口头代码来表示。

相似文献

1
The effects of interference on recognition of haptic pictures in blindfolded sighted participants: the modality of representation of haptic information.盲视参与者在蒙眼前识别触觉图片时干扰的影响:触觉信息的表示模式。
Scand J Psychol. 2012 Apr;53(2):112-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00934.x. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
2
Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: evidence from interference effects.视觉/触觉跨通道记忆中的心理表征:来自干扰效应的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Feb;59(2):361-76. doi: 10.1080/17470210500173232.
3
Blindness enhances tactile acuity and haptic 3-D shape discrimination.失明会提高触觉敏锐度和触觉三维形状辨别能力。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Oct;73(7):2323-31. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0160-4.
4
The influence of facing direction on the haptic identification of two-dimensional raised pictures.朝向对二维凸起图片触觉识别的影响。
Perception. 2009;38(4):606-12. doi: 10.1068/p5881.
5
Multisensory object representation: insights from studies of vision and touch.多感觉物体表征:来自视觉和触觉研究的启示。
Prog Brain Res. 2011;191:165-76. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53752-2.00006-0.
6
Recognition memory for tactile sequences.触觉序列的识别记忆。
Memory. 2002 Jan;10(1):7-20. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000128.
7
Are representations of unfamiliar faces independent of encoding modality?对不熟悉面孔的表征是否独立于编码方式?
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Feb 1;45(3):506-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.011. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
8
Visual, haptic and cross-modal recognition of objects and scenes.物体和场景的视觉、触觉及跨模态识别。
J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):147-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.006.
9
Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex.由视觉到听觉的感官替代所传达的形状激活了枕外侧复合体。
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jun;10(6):687-9. doi: 10.1038/nn1912. Epub 2007 May 21.
10
Ambient visual information confers a context-specific, long-term benefit on memory for haptic scenes.环境视觉信息赋予触觉场景记忆以特定于上下文的长期益处。
Cognition. 2013 Sep;128(3):363-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Jun 10.