Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence and Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):70-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01250.x.
Lack of adequate risk adjustment methodologies has hindered the progress of emergency medicine health services research. The authors hypothesized that a consensus-derived, diagnosis-based severity classification system (SCS) would be significantly associated with actual measures of emergency department (ED) resource use and could ultimately be used to examine severity-adjusted outcomes across patient populations.
A panel of subject matter experts used consensus methods to assign severity scores (1 = lowest severity to 5 = highest severity) to 3,041 ED International Classifications of Diseases (ICD), 9th revision, diagnosis codes. SCS scores were assigned to ED visits using the visit diagnosis code with the highest severity. We tested the association between the SCS scores and measures of ED resource use in three data sets: the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Core Data Project (PCDP), the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), and the Connecticut state ED data set.
There was a significant association between the five-level SCS and all six measures of resource use: triage category, disposition, ED resource use, Current Procedural Terminology Evaluation and Management (CPT E&M) codes, ED length of stay, and ED charges within the three ED data sets.
The SCS demonstrates validity in its strong association with actual ED resource use. The use of readily available ICD-9 diagnosis codes makes the SCS useful as a risk adjustment tool for health services research.
缺乏充分的风险调整方法阻碍了急诊医学卫生服务研究的进展。作者假设一个共识得出的、基于诊断的严重程度分类系统(SCS)将与急诊科(ED)资源使用的实际衡量标准显著相关,并最终可以用于检查不同患者人群的严重程度调整结果。
一组主题专家使用共识方法将严重程度评分(1=最低严重程度到 5=最高严重程度)分配给 3041 个 ED 国际疾病分类(ICD)第 9 版诊断代码。使用就诊诊断代码中最严重的代码为 ED 就诊分配 SCS 评分。我们在三个数据集(儿科急诊护理应用研究网络核心数据项目(PCDP)、国家医院门诊医疗保健调查(NHAMCS)和康涅狄格州 ED 数据集)中测试了 SCS 评分与 ED 资源使用衡量标准之间的关联。
五级 SCS 与资源使用的所有六个衡量标准之间存在显著关联:分诊类别、处置、ED 资源使用、当前程序术语评估和管理(CPT E&M)代码、ED 停留时间和 ED 收费。
SCS 与实际 ED 资源使用的强关联证明了其有效性。使用现成的 ICD-9 诊断代码使 SCS 成为卫生服务研究中风险调整工具的有用工具。