Baumann Michael R, Strout Tania D
Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center, 321 Brackett Street, Portland, ME 04102, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;12(3):219-24. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.09.023.
As demand for emergency services outpaces available allocated resources, emergency department (ED) triage systems face increasing scrutiny. Longer waits for care make the use of reliable, valid triage systems imperative to patient safety. Little is known about the reliability and validity of triage systems in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Emergency Severity Index version 3 (ESIv.3) triage algorithm in a pediatric population.
This two-phase investigation used both retrospective chart review and prospective, observational designs. Interrater reliability was evaluated using ED triage scenarios, a prospective cohort of ED patients presenting to triage, and retrospective triage assignments using the original triage note. ED triage nurses, nurse investigators, and physician investigators performed retrospective blinded triages using only the original triage note to assess reproducibility. In the second phase, validity was assessed using a retrospective analysis of observed resource use, ED length of stay, and hospitalization compared with resource utilization estimated at triage by the ESI.
In the reliability phase, weighted kappa for ED nurse triage of standard scenarios ranged from 0.84 to 1.00, representing excellent agreement. Twenty ED pediatric patients were triaged simultaneously by an ED triage nurse and the nurse investigator. Weighted kappa was 0.82 (95% confidence interval = 0.66 to 0.98), also representing strong agreement between raters. When used for retrospective chart review, the weighted kappa statistics ranged from 0.42 to 0.84, representing poor to good agreement among the different categories of reviewers. During the validity phase, 510 patients were included in the final data analysis. Hospitalization, ED length of stay, and resource utilization were strongly associated with ESIv.3 category.
The ESI triage algorithm demonstrated reliability and validity between triage assignment and resource use in this group of ED pediatric patients.
由于急诊服务需求超过了可用的分配资源,急诊科(ED)分诊系统面临越来越多的审查。等待治疗的时间延长使得使用可靠、有效的分诊系统对患者安全至关重要。关于儿童分诊系统的可靠性和有效性知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估急诊严重程度指数第3版(ESIv.3)分诊算法在儿科人群中的可靠性和有效性。
这项两阶段调查采用了回顾性病历审查和前瞻性观察设计。使用急诊分诊场景、前来分诊的急诊患者前瞻性队列以及使用原始分诊记录的回顾性分诊分配来评估评分者间信度。急诊分诊护士、护士调查员和医生调查员仅使用原始分诊记录进行回顾性盲法分诊,以评估可重复性。在第二阶段,通过对观察到的资源使用、急诊留观时间和住院情况进行回顾性分析,并与ESIv.3在分诊时估计的资源利用情况进行比较,来评估效度。
在信度阶段,急诊护士对标准场景进行分诊的加权kappa值范围为0.84至1.00,表明一致性极佳。20名急诊儿科患者由一名急诊分诊护士和护士调查员同时进行分诊。加权kappa值为0.82(95%置信区间 = 0.66至0.98),也表明评分者之间有很强的一致性。用于回顾性病历审查时,加权kappa统计值范围为0.42至0.84,表明不同类别审查者之间的一致性从差到好。在效度阶段,最终数据分析纳入了510名患者。住院、急诊留观时间和资源利用与ESIv.3类别密切相关。
ESIv.3分诊算法在这组急诊儿科患者的分诊分配和资源使用之间显示出可靠性和有效性。