Suppr超能文献

急性和慢性稳定态美沙酮对大鼠记忆检索的影响。

The effects of acute and chronic steady state methadone on memory retrieval in rats.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, N1G 2W1, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jul;222(2):225-35. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2638-8. Epub 2012 Jan 19.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Although widely prescribed to treat opioid addiction, little is known about the possible side effects of methadone on memory functions.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of acute and chronic methadone on memory retrieval in rats and to explore the selectivity of possible deficits.

METHODS

Administration of acute (0, 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg SC) and chronic steady state methadone (0, 10, 30, and 55 mg/kg/day SC by osmotic mini-pump) was tested on recall of three different types of information: stimulus-reward (10-arm parallel maze), stimulus-response (8-arm radial maze), and stimulus-stimulus (Barnes maze). Acute and steady state methadone doses were also compared on tests of locomotor activity and reactivity to aversive stimuli (i.e., swimming and acoustic startle).

RESULTS

In the stimulus-reward task, acute methadone impaired performance as a result of severe depression of locomotion. This motor deficit, however, was modulated by the motivational valence of environmental stimulation. In fact, acute methadone did not eliminate forced swimming behavior. In the stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus tasks, accuracy was impaired independently of direct motor deficits, but rats were hyper-reactive to aversive stimulation and, in fact, 5 mg/kg enhanced acoustic startle. Importantly, chronic steady state methadone did not affect accuracy of memory retrieval, did not depress motor or swimming activity, and did not change startle reactivity.

CONCLUSION

Only acute methadone impaired accuracy and/or performance on three tests of memory retrieval. These findings in rats suggest that memory deficits reported in methadone-maintained individuals may not be directly attributable to methadone.

摘要

背景

尽管美沙酮被广泛用于治疗阿片类药物成瘾,但对于美沙酮对记忆功能可能产生的副作用知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在比较急性和慢性美沙酮对大鼠记忆检索的影响,并探讨可能存在的缺陷的选择性。

方法

通过鞘内注射(0、1.25、2.5 和 5 mg/kg)和慢性稳定状态美沙酮(通过渗透微型泵鞘内注射 0、10、30 和 55 mg/kg/天)来测试急性和慢性美沙酮对三种不同类型信息的记忆检索的影响:刺激-奖励(10 臂平行迷宫)、刺激-反应(8 臂放射状迷宫)和刺激-刺激(巴恩斯迷宫)。还比较了急性和稳定状态美沙酮剂量对运动活动和对厌恶刺激(即游泳和听觉惊跳)的反应能力的影响。

结果

在刺激-奖励任务中,急性美沙酮严重抑制了运动,导致了运动能力的降低,从而损害了表现。然而,这种运动缺陷受到环境刺激动机效价的调节。事实上,急性美沙酮并没有消除强制游泳行为。在刺激-反应和刺激-刺激任务中,准确性受损与直接运动缺陷无关,但大鼠对厌恶刺激反应过度,事实上,5 mg/kg 增强了听觉惊跳。重要的是,慢性稳定状态美沙酮不影响记忆检索的准确性,不抑制运动或游泳活动,也不改变惊跳反应。

结论

只有急性美沙酮损害了三种记忆检索测试的准确性和/或表现。这些在大鼠中的发现表明,美沙酮维持个体报告的记忆缺陷可能与美沙酮直接无关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验