Hofmeyr G Justus, Lawrie Theresa A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, East London Hospital Complex, University of the Witwatersrand, University of FortHare, Eastern Cape Department of Health, East London, South Africa.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD000013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000013.pub2.
Amnioinfusion aims to prevent or relieve umbilical cord compression during labour by infusing a solution into the uterine cavity.
To assess the effects of amnioinfusion for potential or suspected umbilical cord compression on maternal and perinatal outcome .
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 October 2011).
Randomised trials of amnioinfusion compared with no amnioinfusion in women with babies at risk of umbilical cord compression in labour.
The original review had one author only (Justus Hofmeyr (GJH)). For this update, two authors (GJH and T Lawrie) assessed 13 additional trial reports for eligibility and quality. We extracted data and checked for accuracy.
We have included 19 studies, with all but two studies having fewer than 200 participants. Transcervical amnioinfusion for potential or suspected umbilical cord compression was associated with the following reductions: caesarean section overall (13 trials, 1493 participants; average risk ratio (RR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 0.83); fetal heart rate (FHR) decelerations (seven trials, 1006 participants; average RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.74); Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (12 trials, 1804 participants; average RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.72); meconium below the vocal cords (three trials, 674 participants, RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.92); postpartum endometritis (six trials, 767 participants; RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.81) and maternal hospital stay greater than three days (four trials, 1051 participants; average RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.78). Transabdominal amnioinfusion showed similar trends, though numbers studied were small.Mean cord umbilical artery pH was higher in the amnioinfusion group (seven trials, 855 participants; average mean difference 0.03, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.06) and there was a trend toward fewer neonates with a low cord arterial pH (less than 7.2 or as defined by trial authors) in the amnioinfusion group (eight trials, 972 participants, average RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.14).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The use of amnioinfusion for potential or suspected umbilical cord compression may be of considerable benefit to mother and baby by reducing the occurrence of variable FHR decelerations, improving short-term measures of neonatal outcome, reducing maternal postpartum endometritis and lowering the use of caesarean section, although there were methodological limitations to the trials reviewed here. In addition, the trials are too small to address the possibility of rare but serious maternal adverse effects of amnioinfusion. More research is needed to confirm the findings, assess longer-term measures of fetal outcome, and to assess the impact on caesarean section rates when the diagnosis of fetal distress is more stringent. Trials should assess amnioinfusion in specific clinical situations, such as FHR decelerations, oligohydramnios or prelabour rupture of membranes.
羊膜腔灌注旨在通过向子宫腔内注入溶液来预防或缓解分娩期间的脐带受压。
评估羊膜腔灌注对潜在或疑似脐带受压的产妇及围产期结局的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2011年10月31日)。
将羊膜腔灌注与未进行羊膜腔灌注对分娩时存在脐带受压风险的产妇进行比较的随机试验。
最初的综述只有一位作者(贾斯特斯·霍夫迈尔(GJH))。此次更新时,两位作者(GJH和T·劳里)评估了另外13篇试验报告的合格性和质量。我们提取了数据并检查其准确性。
我们纳入了19项研究,除两项研究外,其他研究的参与者均少于200名。对潜在或疑似脐带受压进行经宫颈羊膜腔灌注与以下情况的减少相关:总体剖宫产率(13项试验,1493名参与者;平均风险比(RR)0.62,95%置信区间(CI)0.46至0.83);胎儿心率(FHR)减速(7项试验,1006名参与者;平均RR 0.53,95%CI 0.38至0.74);5分钟时阿氏评分低于7分(12项试验,1804名参与者;平均RR 0.47,95%CI 0.30至0.72);声带以下胎粪污染(3项试验,674名参与者,RR 0.53,95%CI 0.31至0.92);产后子宫内膜炎(6项试验,767名参与者;RR 0.45,95%CI 0.25至0.81)以及产妇住院时间超过3天(4项试验,1051名参与者;平均RR 0.45,95%CI 0.25至0.78)。经腹羊膜腔灌注也显示出类似趋势,不过研究的数量较少。羊膜腔灌注组脐带脐动脉pH值较高(7项试验,855名参与者;平均差值0.03,95%CI 0.00至0.06),且羊膜腔灌注组脐带动脉pH值低(低于7.2或根据试验作者定义)的新生儿数量有减少趋势(8项试验,972名参与者,平均RR 0.58,95%CI 0.29至1.14)。
对于潜在或疑似脐带受压使用羊膜腔灌注可能对母婴有相当大的益处,可减少可变FHR减速的发生,改善新生儿结局的短期指标,减少产妇产后子宫内膜炎并降低剖宫产的使用率,尽管此处综述的试验存在方法学局限性。此外,试验规模太小,无法探讨羊膜腔灌注罕见但严重的产妇不良反应的可能性。需要更多研究来证实这些发现,评估胎儿结局的长期指标,并评估当胎儿窘迫诊断更严格时对剖宫产率的影响。试验应评估羊膜腔灌注在特定临床情况中的应用,如FHR减速、羊水过少或胎膜早破。