Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Dec;3(4):186-9. doi: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.4.186. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
Porcelain fused to metal (PFM) crowns provide the best treatment option for teeth that have a large or defective restoration. More than 20% of teeth with PFM crowns or bridges require non-surgical root canal treatment (NSRCT). This may be due to the effect of restorative procedures and the possible leakage of bacteria and or their by-products, which leads to the demise of the tooth pulp. Thus, this study was planned to compare the ability of the restorative materials to seal perforated PFM specimens.
The study evaluates the ability of amalgam, composite or compomer restorative materials to close perforated PFM specimen's in-vitro. Ninety PFM specimens were constructed using Ni-Cr alloys and feldspathic porcelain, and then they were divided into 3 groups: amalgam (A), composite + Exite adhesive bond (B) and compomer + Syntac adhesive bond (C). All the PFM samples were embedded in an acrylic block to provide complete sealing of the hole from the bottom side. After the aging period, each group was further divided into 3 equal subgroups according to the thermocycling period (one week for 70 cycles, one month for 300 cycles and three months for 900 cycles). Each subgroup was put into containers containing dye (Pelikan INK), one maintained at 5℃ and the other at 55℃, each cycle for 30 sec time. The data obtained was analyzed by SPSS, 2006 using one way ANOVA test and student t-test and significant difference level at (P<.01).
The depth of dye penetration was measured at the interfaces of PFM and filling materials using Co-ordinate Vernier Microscope. The lowest levels of the dye penetration for the three groups, as well as subgroups were during the first week. The values of dye leakage had significantly increased by time intervals in subgroups A and C.
It was seen that amalgam showed higher leakage than composite while compomer showed the lowest level of leakage.
烤瓷熔附金属(PFM)冠为牙体大面积缺损或修复体有缺陷的患牙提供了最佳的治疗选择。超过 20%的 PFM 冠或桥修复的牙齿需要非手术根管治疗(NSRCT)。这可能是由于修复程序的影响以及细菌及其产物的可能渗漏,导致牙髓坏死。因此,本研究旨在比较修复材料封闭穿孔 PFM 标本的能力。
本研究评估了汞合金、复合树脂或复合体修复材料封闭穿孔 PFM 标本的能力。使用镍铬合金和长石质瓷制作 90 个 PFM 标本,然后将其分为 3 组:汞合金(A)、复合树脂+Exite 粘接剂(B)和复合体+Syntac 粘接剂(C)。所有 PFM 样本均嵌入丙烯酸块中,从底部完全密封孔。老化期后,根据热循环期(一周 70 次循环,一个月 300 次循环,三个月 900 次循环)将每组进一步分为 3 个相等的亚组。每个亚组都放入装有染料(Pelikan INK)的容器中,一个容器保持在 5°C,另一个容器保持在 55°C,每个循环持续 30 秒。使用 SPSS 2006 统计软件对获得的数据进行分析,采用单向方差分析和学生 t 检验,显著性水平为(P<.01)。
使用坐标游标显微镜测量 PFM 和填充材料界面处染料的渗透深度。三组以及亚组的染料渗透深度最低值均在第一周。亚组 A 和 C 中的染料泄漏值随时间间隔显著增加。
汞合金的泄漏量高于复合树脂,而复合体的泄漏量最低。