Department of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Prosthetic, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Oct 3;27:e932745. doi: 10.12659/MSM.932745.
BACKGROUND This spectrophotometric study assessed the color stability of CAD/CAM restorative materials with different exposed surfaces following staining by hot Arabic Qahwa and cold coffee. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ninety-six specimens were fabricated from 3 different CAD/CAM ceramic materials: Vita Suprinity (Vita-S), Vita Enamic (Vita-E), and Vitablocs Mark II (Vitablocs-MII). We divided 32 specimens for each group into glazed or polished surfaces, with 16 specimens in each group, then subdivided them according to staining materials: Arabic Qahwa and Frappuccino Cold Coffee. Color of specimens was measured during immersion in staining materials (BEFORE) as baseline with (Vita classic) and (L, a, b), for average color changes (ΔE₀₀), then remeasured after 2, 4, and 12 weeks, and described as 1st, 2nd, and 3rd measurements for VITAPAN Classic shade and T1, T2, and T3 for ΔE00 values using the CIE Lab* equation. We performed ANOVA and then post hoc testing. RESULTS We found significant differences in ΔE₀₀ values during immersing in hot Arabic Qahwa and cold coffee for tested materials in glazed or polished specimens. Polished specimens of Vita-S and Vita-E had the highest color changing and staining compared to glazed surfaces. Vitablocs-MII had the best color stability through immersion periods. Moreover, there were changes in relation to VITAPAN Classic shade guide for both Vita-S and Vita-E specimens during different immersion periods. CONCLUSIONS Coffee caused staining and contamination of ceramic material. Values of ΔE₀₀ for tested ceramic materials were significantly different but were within the clinically acceptable range. Polished specimens showed higher staining; therefore, we highly recommend re-glazing of ceramic restorations to maintain color stability.
本分光光度研究评估了不同暴露表面的 CAD/CAM 修复材料在热阿拉伯咖啡和冷咖啡染色后的颜色稳定性。
从 3 种不同的 CAD/CAM 陶瓷材料(Vita Suprinity[Vita-S]、Vita Enamic[Vita-E]和 Vitablocs Mark II[Vitablocs-MII])中制备了 96 个样本。我们将 32 个样本分为釉面或抛光表面,每组 16 个样本,然后根据染色材料进一步细分:阿拉伯咖啡和冷萃咖啡。在浸入染色材料(基线时)之前(使用 Vita classic 和 L、a、b)测量标本的颜色,测量平均颜色变化(ΔE₀₀),然后在 2、4 和 12 周后重新测量,并将 VITAPAN Classic 色调的第 1、2 和 3 次测量和 ΔE00 值的 T1、T2 和 T3 描述为测试材料的釉面或抛光标本浸入热阿拉伯咖啡和冷萃咖啡后的第 1、2 和 3 次测量。我们进行了方差分析,然后进行了事后检验。
我们发现,在釉面或抛光标本中,浸入热阿拉伯咖啡和冷萃咖啡时,测试材料的 ΔE₀₀ 值有显著差异。与釉面相比,Vita-S 和 Vita-E 的抛光标本颜色变化和染色程度最高。在浸泡过程中,Vitablocs-MII 的颜色稳定性最好。此外,在不同的浸泡期,Vita-S 和 Vita-E 标本的 VITAPAN Classic 比色指南也发生了变化。
咖啡会导致陶瓷材料染色和污染。测试陶瓷材料的 ΔE₀₀ 值差异显著,但在临床可接受范围内。抛光标本显示出更高的染色程度;因此,我们强烈建议重新上釉以保持陶瓷修复体的颜色稳定性。