Rhie Sangho, Choi Jun Young, Jang In Seok, Kim Jong Woo, Lee Chung Eun, Park Hyun Oh
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Korea.
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jun;44(3):220-4. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2011.44.3.220. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
We investigated changes in the International Normalized Ratio (INR) and its measurement interval in patients with thromboembolic events who were treated by low intensity anticoagulation therapy after isolated mechanical aortic valve replacement.
Seventy-seven patients who underwent surgery from June 1990 to September 2006 were enrolled in the study and observed until August 2008. The patients were followed up at 48 week intervals and their warfarin (Coumadin)® dosage was adjusted aiming for a target range of INR 1.52.5. The rate of thromboembolic events was obtained. Changes in the mean INR and INR measurement interval were comparatively analyzed between the normal group (event free group, N=52) who had no anticoagulation-related complications and the thromboembolic group (N=10). Hospital records were reviewed retrospectively.
The observation period was 666.75 patient-years. Thromboembolic events occurred in 10 patients. The linearized occurrence rate of thromboembolism was 1.50%/patient-years. Actuarial thromboembolism-free rates were 97.10±2.02% at 5 years, 84.30±5.22% at 10 years, and 67.44±12.14% at 15 years. The percentages of INR within the target range and mean INR were not statistically significantly different for the normal and thromboembolic groups. However, the mean INR during the segmented period just before the events showed a significantly lower level in the thromboembolic group (during a 4 month period: normal group, 1.86±0.14 vs. thromboembolic group, 1.50±0.28, p<0.001). The mean intervals of INR measurement during the whole observation period showed no significant differences between groups, but in the segmented period just before the events, the interval was significantly longer in thromboembolic group (during a 6 month period: normal group, 49.04±9.47 days vs. thromboembolic group, 65.89±44.88 days, p<0.01).
To prevent the occurrence of thromboembolic events in patients who receive isolated aortic valve replacement and low intensity anticoagulation therapy, we suggest that it would be safe to maintain an INR level above 1.8 and to measure the INR at least every 7~8 weeks.
我们研究了单纯机械主动脉瓣置换术后接受低强度抗凝治疗的血栓栓塞事件患者的国际标准化比值(INR)变化及其测量间隔。
选取1990年6月至2006年9月接受手术的77例患者纳入研究,并观察至2008年8月。患者每隔4至8周进行随访,调整华法林(可迈丁)®剂量,目标INR范围为1.5至2.5。获取血栓栓塞事件发生率。对无抗凝相关并发症的正常组(无事件组,N = 52)和血栓栓塞组(N = 10)之间的平均INR和INR测量间隔变化进行比较分析。回顾性查阅医院记录。
观察期为666.75患者年。10例患者发生血栓栓塞事件。血栓栓塞的线性发生率为1.50%/患者年。5年时无血栓栓塞生存率为97.10±2.02%,10年时为84.30±5.22%,15年时为67.44±12.14%。正常组和血栓栓塞组的INR在目标范围内的百分比及平均INR无统计学显著差异。然而,事件发生前分段时期的平均INR在血栓栓塞组中显著较低(在4个月期间:正常组,1.86±0.14 vs. 血栓栓塞组,1.50±0.28,p<0.001)。整个观察期内INR测量的平均间隔在两组间无显著差异,但在事件发生前的分段时期,血栓栓塞组的间隔显著更长(在6个月期间:正常组,49.04±9.47天 vs. 血栓栓塞组,65.89±44.88天,p<0.01)。
为预防单纯主动脉瓣置换和低强度抗凝治疗患者发生血栓栓塞事件,我们建议将INR水平维持在1.8以上并至少每7至8周测量一次INR是安全的。