Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Santiago de Compostela, E-27002 Lugo, Spain.
J Colloid Interface Sci. 2012 Mar 15;370(1):102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.12.037. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
An empirical model for the concentrations of monomeric and micellized surfactants in solution is presented as a consistent approach for the quantitative analysis of data obtained with different experimental techniques from surfactant solutions. The concentration model provides an objective definition of the critical micelle concentration (cmc) and yields precise and well defined values of derived physical parameters. The use of a general concentration model eliminates subjective graphical procedures, reduces methodological differences, and thus allows one to compare directly the results of different techniques or to perform global fits. The application and validity of the model are demonstrated with electrical conductivity, surface tension, NMR chemical shift, and self-diffusion coefficient data for the surfactants SDS, CTAB, DTAB, and LAS. In all cases, the derived models yield excellent fits of the data. It is also shown that there is no need to assume the existence of different premicellar species in order to explain the chemical shifts and self-diffusion coefficients of SDS as claimed recently by some authors.
提出了一种用于溶液中单体和胶束化表面活性剂浓度的经验模型,作为定量分析不同实验技术从表面活性剂溶液中获得的数据的一致方法。浓度模型为临界胶束浓度(cmc)提供了客观的定义,并产生了衍生物理参数的精确和明确定义的值。使用通用浓度模型消除了主观的图形程序,减少了方法学差异,从而允许直接比较不同技术的结果或进行全局拟合。该模型的应用和有效性通过 SDS、CTAB、DTAB 和 LAS 等表面活性剂的电导率、表面张力、NMR 化学位移和自扩散系数数据得到了证明。在所有情况下,所得到的模型都对数据进行了很好的拟合。还表明,没有必要假设存在不同的预胶束物种,以解释最近一些作者声称的 SDS 的化学位移和自扩散系数。