Norman Parathyroid Center, Tampa, FL 33544, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Mar;214(3):260-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
Our group championed the techniques and benefits of unilateral parathyroidectomy. As our experience has matured, it seems this limited operation might be appropriate only occasionally.
A single surgical group's experience with 15,000 parathyroidectomies examined the ongoing differences between unilateral and bilateral techniques for 10-year failure/recurrence, multigland removal, operative times, and length of stay.
With limited experience, 100% of operations were bilateral, decreasing to 32% by the 500(th) operation (p < 0.001), and long-term failure rates increased to 6%. Failures were 11 times more likely for unilateral explorations (p < 0.001 vs bilateral), causing gradual increases in bilateral explorations to 97% at the 14,000(th) operation (p < 0.001). Ten-year cure rates are unchanged for bilateral operations, and unilateral operations show continued slow recurrence rates of 5% (p < 0.001). Removal of more than one gland occurred 16 times more frequently when 4 glands were analyzed (p < 0.001), increasing cure rates to the current 99.4% (p < 0.001). Of 1,060 reoperations performed for failure at another institution, intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels fell >50% in 22% of patients, yet a second adenoma was subsequently found. Operative times decreased with experience; bilateral operations taking only 5.9 minutes longer on average (22.3 vs 16.4 minutes; p < 0.001), which is 25 minutes less than unilateral at the 500(th) operation (p < 0.001). By the 1,000(th) operation, incision size (2.5 ± 0.2 cm), anesthesia, and hospital stay (1.6 hours) were identical for unilateral and bilateral procedures.
Regardless of surgical adjuncts (scanning, intraoperative parathyroid hormone), unilateral parathyroidectomy will carry a 1-year failure rate of 3% to 5% and a 10-year recurrence rate of 4% to 6%. Allowing rapid analysis of all 4 glands through the same 1-inch incision has caused us to all but abandon unilateral parathyroidectomy.
我们团队倡导了单侧甲状旁腺切除术的技术和优势。随着经验的积累,这种有限的手术似乎只在偶尔情况下才适用。
一个单一的外科手术组在 10 年的失败/复发、多腺体切除、手术时间和住院时间方面,对 15000 例甲状旁腺切除术的单侧和双侧技术进行了比较。
在经验有限的情况下,100%的手术是双侧的,到第 500 次手术时降至 32%(p < 0.001),长期失败率增加到 6%。单侧探查的失败可能性是双侧探查的 11 倍(p < 0.001 与双侧比较),导致双侧探查逐渐增加到第 14000 次手术时的 97%(p < 0.001)。双侧手术的 10 年治愈率保持不变,而单侧手术的复发率仍持续缓慢上升至 5%(p < 0.001)。当分析 4 个腺体时,超过一个腺体的切除发生率增加了 16 倍(p < 0.001),从而提高了治愈率至目前的 99.4%(p < 0.001)。在另一家机构因手术失败而进行的 1060 次再手术中,22%的患者甲状旁腺激素水平下降超过 50%,但随后发现了第二个腺瘤。随着经验的积累,手术时间缩短;双侧手术平均仅延长 5.9 分钟(22.3 分钟比 16.4 分钟;p < 0.001),在第 500 次手术时比单侧手术少 25 分钟(p < 0.001)。到第 1000 次手术时,单侧和双侧手术的切口大小(2.5 ± 0.2 厘米)、麻醉和住院时间(1.6 小时)相同。
无论是否使用手术辅助手段(扫描、术中甲状旁腺激素),单侧甲状旁腺切除术在 1 年内的失败率为 3%至 5%,10 年内的复发率为 4%至 6%。通过同一个 1 英寸切口快速分析所有 4 个腺体,使我们几乎完全放弃了单侧甲状旁腺切除术。