• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用公共卫生方法设计创伤系统管理模型:以伊朗为例。

Designing a model for trauma system management using public health approach: the case of Iran.

作者信息

Tarighi Payam, Tabibi Seyed Jamaledin, Motevalian Seyed Abbas, Tofighi Shahram, Maleki Mohammad Reza, Delgoshaei Bahram, Panahi Farzad, Masoomi Gholam Reza

机构信息

Department of Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

出版信息

Acta Med Iran. 2012;50(1):9-17.

PMID:22267372
Abstract

Trauma is a leading cause of death and disability around the world. Injuries are responsible for about six million deaths annually, of which ninety percent occur in developing countries. In Iran, injuries are the most common cause of death among age groups below fifty. Trauma system development is a systematic and comprehensive approach to injury prevention and treatment whose effectiveness has been proved. The present study aims at designing a trauma system management model as the first step toward trauma system establishment in Iran. In this qualitative research, a conceptual framework was developed based on the public health approach and three well-known trauma system models. We used Benchmarks, Indicators and Scoring (BIS) to analyze the current situation of Iran trauma care system. Then the trauma system management was designed using the policy development phase of public health approach The trauma system management model, validated by a panel of experts, describes lead agency, trauma system plan, policy-making councils, and data-based control according to the four main functions of management: leading, planning, organizing and controlling. This model may be implemented in two phases: the exclusive phase, focusing on resource integration and the inclusive phase, which concentrates on system development. The model could facilitate the development of trauma system in Iran through pilot studies as the assurance phase of public health approach. Furthermore, the model can provide a practical framework for trauma system management at the international level.

摘要

创伤是全球死亡和残疾的主要原因。伤害每年导致约600万人死亡,其中90%发生在发展中国家。在伊朗,伤害是50岁以下年龄组中最常见的死亡原因。创伤系统的发展是一种系统而全面的伤害预防和治疗方法,其有效性已得到证实。本研究旨在设计一个创伤系统管理模型,作为伊朗建立创伤系统的第一步。在这项定性研究中,基于公共卫生方法和三个著名的创伤系统模型开发了一个概念框架。我们使用基准、指标和评分(BIS)来分析伊朗创伤护理系统的现状。然后,利用公共卫生方法的政策制定阶段设计创伤系统管理。经专家小组验证的创伤系统管理模型,根据管理的四个主要功能:领导、规划、组织和控制,描述了牵头机构、创伤系统计划、决策委员会和基于数据的控制。该模型可分两个阶段实施:专注于资源整合的排他阶段和专注于系统发展的包容阶段。该模型可以通过试点研究作为公共卫生方法的保障阶段,促进伊朗创伤系统的发展。此外,该模型可以为国际层面的创伤系统管理提供一个实用框架。

相似文献

1
Designing a model for trauma system management using public health approach: the case of Iran.运用公共卫生方法设计创伤系统管理模型:以伊朗为例。
Acta Med Iran. 2012;50(1):9-17.
2
Sustaining an inclusive trauma system in a rural state: the role of regional care systems, partnerships, and quality of care.在一个农村州维持一个包容性的创伤系统:区域护理系统、伙伴关系和护理质量的作用。
J Trauma Nurs. 2010 Jul-Sep;17(3):142-7. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0b013e3181f52114.
3
All inclusive benchmarking.全括式基准测试
J Nurs Manag. 2006 Jul;14(5):377-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00596.x.
4
Donabedian's structure-process-outcome quality of care model: Validation in an integrated trauma system.唐纳贝迪安的医疗服务质量结构-过程-结果模型:在综合创伤系统中的验证
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Jun;78(6):1168-75. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000663.
5
Disaster metrics: quantitative benchmarking of hospital surge capacity in trauma-related multiple casualty events.灾难指标:创伤相关多人伤亡事件中医院应急能力的定量基准测试。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011 Jun;5(2):117-24. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.19. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
6
Improving trauma care in rural Iran by training existing treatment chains.通过培训现有的治疗链来改善伊朗农村地区的创伤护理。
Rural Remote Health. 2008 Oct-Dec;8(4):881. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
7
Assessment of Lithuanian trauma care service using a conceptual framework for assessing the performance of health system.使用评估卫生系统绩效的概念框架评估立陶宛创伤护理服务。
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Feb;22(1):26-31. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq184. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
8
Programmatic management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: models from three countries.耐多药结核病的规划管理:三个国家的模式。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011 Oct;15(10):1294-300. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.10.0591. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
9
Health services research related to performance indicators and benchmarking in Europe.欧洲与绩效指标和基准相关的卫生服务研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16 Suppl 2:38-47. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011042.
10
Organizational adaptation: bridging the research to practice gap.组织适应性:弥合研究与实践之间的差距。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):95-9. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0275-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in traumatic spinal cord injury care in developing countries - a scoping review.发展中国家创伤性脊髓损伤护理面临的挑战——范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 19;12:1377513. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377513. eCollection 2024.
2
Design and psychometric evaluation of health system intervention assessment tools for children in floods.洪水地区儿童卫生系统干预评估工具的设计与心理测量学评价
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Aug 31;12:278. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_523_22. eCollection 2023.
3
Design and psychometrics of risk assessment tool for makeshift hospitals: Focusing on pandemics.
临时医院风险评估工具的设计与心理测量学:以大流行病为重点。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr;9(4):e14973. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14973. Epub 2023 Mar 30.