Kozobolis Vassilios P, Paschalis Eleftherios I, Labiris Georgios, Foudoulakis Nikitas C, Konstantinidis Aristeidis, Koukoula Stavrenia C
Department of Ophthalmology & Eye Institute of Thrace, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep-Oct;22(5):726-33. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000107.
To perform qualitative evaluation of the aqueous humor (AH) outflow mechanism in glaucoma and nonglaucoma patients by means of tonography assessment and mathematical analysis.
Sixty-two primary open angle and 58 pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients were recruited in a non-interventional, observational study between 2004 and 2007. Qualitative and quantitative outflow assessment was acquired by means of a digital tonographer and mathematical analysis. Qualitative results were represented using slope analysis of the change of the AH outflow rate over the tonography study. The results were compared to the control group (CG; n=100) as well as to a pseudoexfoliation group (PEX; n=46).
Regarding quantitative analysis, glaucoma groups exhibited significantly lower outflow facility compared to nonglaucoma ones (p<0.001). Outflow facility value was significantly correlated to cup to disc ratio (Pearson correlation r=-0.3, p<0.001). Regarding qualitative analysis, the primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) group presented a significant profile variation at the beginning of the tonography, expressed as an increased resistance of the AH outflow. Both glaucoma groups exhibited profile stabilization at the end of the measurement, suggesting that the outflow rate remained constant, while nonglaucoma groups followed a continuous reduction of the AH outflow rate throughout the study.
The POAG, PXG, PEX, and CG groups demonstrated both qualitative and quantitative tonographic profile differences. The observed differences in the glaucoma groups suggest a distinct pathomechanism between POAG and PXG. It is suggested that POAG patients have a temporary disruption of the AH flow pathway, while PXG patients have a generalized increased flow resistance.
通过眼压描记评估和数学分析对青光眼和非青光眼患者的房水流出机制进行定性评估。
在2004年至2007年期间,一项非干预性观察研究招募了62例原发性开角型青光眼患者和58例假性剥脱性青光眼患者。通过数字眼压计和数学分析进行定性和定量流出评估。定性结果通过眼压描记研究中房水流出率变化的斜率分析来表示。将结果与对照组(CG;n = 100)以及假性剥脱组(PEX;n = 46)进行比较。
关于定量分析,青光眼组的流出易度明显低于非青光眼组(p < 0.001)。流出易度值与杯盘比显著相关(Pearson相关系数r = -0.3,p < 0.001)。关于定性分析,原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)组在眼压描记开始时呈现出显著的曲线变化,表现为房水流出阻力增加。两个青光眼组在测量结束时均表现出曲线稳定,表明流出率保持恒定,而非青光眼组在整个研究过程中房水流出率持续降低。
POAG、PXG、PEX和CG组在眼压描记的定性和定量曲线方面均存在差异。青光眼组中观察到的差异表明POAG和PXG之间存在不同的发病机制。提示POAG患者房水流动途径存在暂时中断,而PXG患者存在普遍的流动阻力增加。