Suppr超能文献

评估厄贝沙坦对射血分数保留的心力衰竭的长期影响,方法是使用明尼苏达州心力衰竭生活质量问卷进行测量,这项研究来自于厄贝沙坦在射血分数保留的心力衰竭中的作用(I-PRESERVE)试验。

Assessment of long-term effects of irbesartan on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction as measured by the minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire in the irbesartan in heart failure with preserved systolic function (I-PRESERVE) trial.

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.

出版信息

Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):217-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.964221. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) was used in a large, multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to measure adverse effects of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) on patients' lives and the effects of irbesartan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with symptomatic HF-PEF were randomly assigned to irbesartan (up to 300 mg daily) or placebo. The MLHFQ was administered at baseline (n=3605), month 6 (n=3137), month 14 (n=2904), and the end of study (median, 56 months, n=2205). Baseline MLHFQ scores of 43±21 indicated that HF-PEF had a substantial adverse effects. Estimated retest reliability was 0.80. Baseline MLHFQ scores were associated with other measures of the severity of heart failure including symptoms, signs of congestion, cardiac structure, and time to hospitalizations or deaths attributed to heart failure. Slight improvement in shortness of breath or fatigue was associated with significant improvement in MLHFQ scores (-5.9 and -5.0, P<0.0001). Compared with placebo, further improvement in MLHFQ scores was not observed with irbesartan after 6 months (mean adjusted difference, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, -0.8 to 1.7), 14 months (0.5; 95% confidence interval, -0.9 to 1.8), or the end of study (2.0; 95% confidence interval, -4.1 to 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The MLHFQ scores are a reliable, valid, and sensitive measure of the adverse impact of HF-PEF on patients' lives. Irbesartan did not substantially improve MLHFQ scores during a long period of follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00095238.

摘要

背景

明尼苏达心力衰竭生活质量问卷(MLHFQ)曾用于一项大型、多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验,以评估射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HF-PEF)对患者生活的不良影响以及厄贝沙坦的疗效。

方法和结果

有症状的 HF-PEF 患者被随机分配至厄贝沙坦(最高 300mg/天)或安慰剂组。在基线(n=3605)、第 6 个月(n=3137)、第 14 个月(n=2904)和研究结束时(中位数 56 个月,n=2205)进行 MLHFQ 评估。基线 MLHFQ 评分为 43±21,表明 HF-PEF 具有显著的不良影响。估计重测信度为 0.80。基线 MLHFQ 评分与其他心力衰竭严重程度的评估指标相关,包括症状、充血体征、心脏结构以及心力衰竭导致的住院或死亡时间。呼吸困难或疲劳稍有改善与 MLHFQ 评分的显著改善相关(-5.9 和-5.0,P<0.0001)。与安慰剂相比,厄贝沙坦在 6 个月(平均调整差异,0.4;95%置信区间,-0.8 至 1.7)、14 个月(0.5;95%置信区间,-0.9 至 1.8)或研究结束时(2.0;95%置信区间,-4.1 至 0.01)并未观察到 MLHFQ 评分的进一步改善。

结论

MLHFQ 评分是评估 HF-PEF 对患者生活不良影响的可靠、有效且敏感的指标。在长期随访中,厄贝沙坦并未显著改善 MLHFQ 评分。

临床试验注册-网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00095238。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验