• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将科学与实践联系起来,服务于儿童和青少年心理健康服务研究。

Connecting science and practice in child and adolescent mental health services research.

机构信息

Division of Services and Intervention Research, National Institute of Mental Health, 6001 Executive Blvd, Room 7164, Bethesda, MD 20892-9631, USA.

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Jul;39(4):321-6. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0399-z.

DOI:10.1007/s10488-011-0399-z
PMID:22271355
Abstract

Collaboration between researchers and stakeholder groups is a potentially powerful mechanism for strengthening the quality of mental health research and for amplifying its public health impact. For stakeholders, collaboration offers opportunities to help shape research questions; participate in data collection and interpretation; and improve local capacity to access and use research findings. For researchers, collaboration can build understanding of what stakeholders want and need from research; enhance capacity to frame research questions and findings in language and metrics of value to stakeholders; and provide opportunities to contribute science-backed knowledge to decision-making processes in real world settings. Key stakeholder groups can include the recipients and providers of care, public and private care systems, health plans, schools, family service and faith-based organizations, correctional systems, and employers providing mental health benefits. This commentary reflects on the path that NIMH has taken in fostering researcher-stakeholder collaboration, particularly regarding child and adolescent mental health research. It describes the goals that NIMH set out to achieve, steps taken to realize those goals, lessons learned from those efforts, and possible next steps.

摘要

研究人员和利益相关者群体之间的合作是一种潜在的强大机制,可以提高心理健康研究的质量,并增强其对公共卫生的影响。对于利益相关者来说,合作提供了帮助确定研究问题、参与数据收集和解释以及提高当地获取和使用研究成果的能力的机会。对于研究人员来说,合作可以加深对利益相关者对研究的期望和需求的理解;增强以利益相关者重视的语言和指标来构建研究问题和研究结果的能力;并提供机会,为现实环境中的决策过程提供基于科学的知识。关键的利益相关者群体包括护理的接受者和提供者、公共和私人护理系统、医疗保健计划、学校、家庭服务和信仰组织、惩教系统以及提供精神健康福利的雇主。这篇评论反映了 NIMH 在促进研究人员与利益相关者合作方面所采取的路径,特别是在儿童和青少年心理健康研究方面。它描述了 NIMH 设定的目标、为实现这些目标而采取的步骤、从这些努力中吸取的经验教训以及可能的下一步行动。

相似文献

1
Connecting science and practice in child and adolescent mental health services research.将科学与实践联系起来,服务于儿童和青少年心理健康服务研究。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Jul;39(4):321-6. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0399-z.
2
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
3
Organizational adaptation: bridging the research to practice gap.组织适应性:弥合研究与实践之间的差距。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):95-9. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0275-2.
4
Finding the common core: evidence-based practices, clinically relevant evidence, and core mechanisms of change.寻找共同核心:基于证据的实践、临床相关证据和变化的核心机制。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):81-8. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0277-0.
5
Advancing efforts to improve children's mental health in America: a commentary.推进美国儿童心理健康改善工作:一篇评论
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):140-4. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0290-3.
6
Closing the research to practice gap in children's mental health: structures, solutions, and strategies.弥合儿童心理健康研究与实践之间的差距:结构、解决方案和策略。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):111-9. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0286-z.
7
Real change in the real world: an achievable goal.真实世界中的真实改变:一个可实现的目标。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):154-9. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0271-6.
8
Developing effective research-practice partnerships for creating a culture of evidence-based decision making.为创建循证决策文化而建立有效的研究-实践伙伴关系。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Jul;39(4):248-57. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0368-6.
9
Realizing the dream.实现梦想。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):145-8. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0267-2.
10
Introduction of a child and adolescent mental health link worker: education and health staff focus group findings.儿童及青少年心理健康联络专员的引入:教育与卫生工作人员焦点小组的调查结果
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Oct;15(8):670-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2008.01296.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Remote assessment via video evaluation (RAVVE): a pilot study to trial video-enabled peer feedback on clinical performance.远程评估(RAVVE):一项试用视频支持的临床绩效同行反馈的试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Dec 18;19(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1905-3.
2
Development and Evaluation of Two Integrated Care Models for Children Using a Partnered Formative Evaluation Approach.采用合作式形成性评价方法开发和评估两种儿童综合护理模式。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):445-456. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.445. eCollection 2018.
3
Participatory Research as One Piece of the Puzzle: A Systematic Review of Consumer Involvement in Design of Technology-Based Youth Mental Health and Well-Being Interventions.
参与式研究作为拼图的一部分:关于消费者参与基于技术的青少年心理健康与幸福干预措施设计的系统综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2015 Jul 9;2(2):e12. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.4361.
4
A pilot survey of clergy regarding mental health care for children.一项针对神职人员开展的关于儿童心理健康护理的初步调查。
Depress Res Treat. 2012;2012:742410. doi: 10.1155/2012/742410. Epub 2012 Jun 21.