Rodriguez-Carmona Marisa, O'Neill-Biba Matilda, Barbur John L
The Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Vision Sciences, Applied Vision Research Center, City University London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012 Jan;83(1):19-29. doi: 10.3357/asem.3111.2012.
The Ishihara Test (IT) is arguably the most sensitive and commonly used color vision test within aviation and other occupational environments, but when no errors are allowed -20% of normal trichromats fail the test. The number of allowed errors varies in different occupations and sometimes within the same environment (such as aviation) in order to reflect the difficulties of the color-related tasks. The implicit assumption is that the plates can be ranked in order of difficulty. The principal aim of this study was to investigate whether appropriate "weights" can be attached to each IT plate to reflect the likelihood of producing a correct response. A second aim was to justify the use of color thresholds for quantifying the loss of red-green (RG) and yellow-blue (YB) chromatic sensitivity.
We investigated 742 subjects (236 normals, 340 deutans, and 166 protans) using the first 25 plates of the 38-plate IT and measured RG chromatic sensitivity using the Color Assessment and Diagnosis (CAD) test. The IT error scores provided plate-specific "weights" which were used to calculate a Severity Index (SI) of color vision loss for each subject.
Error scores, SI values, and CAD thresholds were measured and compared in each of the three subject groups.
Color thresholds can provide a good measure of the severity of both RG and YB color vision loss. Neither the number of IT plates failed nor the SI value computed in this way can be used to determine reliably the severity of color vision loss.
石原氏色盲测试(IT)可以说是航空及其他职业环境中最敏感且最常用的色觉测试,但在不允许出现错误的情况下,20%的正常三色视者会通不过该测试。在不同职业中,甚至在同一环境(如航空领域)内,允许出现的错误数量也有所不同,以反映与颜色相关任务的难度。隐含的假设是,这些测试图版可以按照难度进行排序。本研究的主要目的是调查是否可以为每个IT测试图版赋予适当的“权重”,以反映做出正确反应的可能性。第二个目的是证明使用颜色阈值来量化红绿色(RG)和黄蓝色(YB)色觉敏感度损失的合理性。
我们使用38版IT测试中的前25个图版对742名受试者(236名正常人、340名绿色盲患者和166名红色盲患者)进行了调查,并使用颜色评估与诊断(CAD)测试测量了RG色觉敏感度。IT错误分数提供了特定图版的“权重”,用于计算每个受试者色觉损失的严重程度指数(SI)。
对三个受试者组中的每一组都测量并比较了错误分数、SI值和CAD阈值。
颜色阈值可以很好地衡量RG和YB色觉损失的严重程度。通过这种方式计算得出的未通过IT测试图版的数量和SI值,都无法可靠地用于确定色觉损失的严重程度。