• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

红绿色觉缺陷受试者在明视条件下使用霍姆斯-赖特灯(A型)的表现。

Performance of red-green color deficient subjects on the Holmes-Wright lantern (Type A) in photopic viewing.

作者信息

Birch J

机构信息

Applied Vision Research Laboratory, Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Sep;70(9):897-901.

PMID:10503756
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Holmes-Wright lantern (Type A) is an approved occupational color vision test for airline pilots in the European Economic Community and for specific occupations in the British Armed Forces. The colors shown are red, green and white signal lights.

HYPOTHESIS

The Holmes-Wright lantern is a sensitive screening test for red-green color deficiency in photopic viewing and the pass/fail level is similar to that of the Farnsworth Lantern (Falant) if the same scoring method is applied.

METHOD

There were 138 color deficient subjects identified with the Ishihara plates and diagnosed with the Nagel anomaloscope, completed a color vision test battery which included three runs of the nine color pairs of the Holmes-Wright lantern at high brightness in normal room illumination.

RESULTS

Screening sensitivity on a single error was found to be 97% compared with the Ishihara plates. Using the Falant scoring method, 20 subjects passed. These were 1 deuteranope, 2 protanomalous trichromats and 17 deuteranomalous trichromats (22% of 88 anomalous trichromats). The mean error score was greater for protans than for deutans but the mean number of qualitative error categories was smaller. Green/white confusions were the most frequent errors. It was not possible to predict who would pass the lantern test from other test results but all subjects with a Nagel anomaloscope matching range > 15 scale units who failed the Farnsworth D15 test or were grading as moderate/severe with the American Optical Company (Hardy, Rand and Rittler) plates failed.

CONCLUSIONS

The Holmes-Wright lantern is a sensitive screening test for red-green color deficiency. Although a similar percentage of anomalous trichromats fail the Holmes-Wright lantern as fail the Falant, if the same scoring method is used, the superior correlation between the Holmes-Wright result and other color vision tests designed to grade the severity of color deficiency suggests that the two lantern results are not equivalent.

摘要

背景

霍姆斯 - 赖特灯(A型)是欧洲经济共同体中航空公司飞行员以及英国武装部队特定职业认可的职业色觉测试工具。所显示的颜色为红色、绿色和白色信号灯。

假设

霍姆斯 - 赖特灯是明视觉下红绿色觉缺陷的敏感筛查测试,如果采用相同的评分方法,其通过/未通过水平与法恩斯沃思灯(法兰特)相似。

方法

138名经石原氏色盲测验鉴定为色觉缺陷且经纳格尔色盲检查仪诊断的受试者,在正常室内照明下,以高亮度完成了一组色觉测试,其中包括对霍姆斯 - 赖特灯的九对颜色进行三轮测试。

结果

与石原氏色盲测验相比,单次错误的筛查敏感度为97%。采用法兰特评分方法时,20名受试者通过。其中有1名红色盲、2名红色弱和17名绿色弱(88名异常三色视者中的22%)。红色弱患者的平均错误分数高于绿色弱患者,但定性错误类别的平均数量较少。绿色/白色混淆是最常见的错误。无法根据其他测试结果预测谁能通过灯箱测试,但所有纳格尔色盲检查仪匹配范围>15个刻度单位、法恩斯沃思D15测试未通过或美国光学公司(哈迪、兰德和里特勒)色盲测试评为中度/重度的受试者均未通过。

结论

霍姆斯 - 赖特灯是红绿色觉缺陷的敏感筛查测试。尽管异常三色视者中未通过霍姆斯 - 赖特灯测试的比例与未通过法兰特灯测试的比例相似,但如果使用相同的评分方法,霍姆斯 - 赖特灯测试结果与其他用于评估色觉缺陷严重程度的色觉测试之间的相关性更强,这表明两种灯箱测试结果并不等同。

相似文献

1
Performance of red-green color deficient subjects on the Holmes-Wright lantern (Type A) in photopic viewing.红绿色觉缺陷受试者在明视条件下使用霍姆斯-赖特灯(A型)的表现。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Sep;70(9):897-901.
2
Performance of red-green color deficient subjects on the Farnsworth Lantern (FALANT).红绿色觉异常受试者在 Farnsworth 信号灯(FALANT)测试中的表现。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Jan;70(1):62-7.
3
Performance of colour-deficient people on the Holmes-Wright lantern (type A): consistency of occupational colour vision standards in aviation.色觉缺陷者在霍姆斯-赖特灯(A型)上的表现:航空领域职业色觉标准的一致性
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 May;28(3):253-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00558.x.
4
Color vision assessment: fail rates of two versions of the Farnsworth lantern test.色觉评估:两种版本的 Farnsworth 灯箱试验的失败率
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006 Jun;77(6):624-30.
5
Color vision tests for aviation: comparison of the anomaloscope and three lantern types.航空领域的色觉测试:检色镜与三种灯型的比较
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 May;76(5):421-9.
6
Clinical use of the American Optical Company (Hardy, Rand and Rittler) pseudoisochromatic plates for red-green colour deficiency.美国光学公司(哈迪、兰德和里特勒)假同色图版在红绿色盲临床中的应用。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997 May;17(3):248-54.
7
Validation of the Holmes - Wright lanterns for testing colour vision.用于测试色觉的霍姆斯-赖特灯的验证
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1983;3(2):137-52.
8
Identification of red-green colour deficiency: sensitivity of the Ishihara and American Optical Company (Hard, Rand and Rittler) pseudo-isochromatic plates to identify slight anomalous trichromatism.辨色力缺陷的鉴定:石原氏和美国光学公司(哈德、兰德和里特勒)假同色板对轻度异常三色视的敏感性。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Sep;30(5):667-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00770.x.
9
Can clinical colour vision tests be used to predict the results of the Farnsworth lantern test?临床色觉测试能否用于预测 Farnsworth 灯箱试验的结果?
Vision Res. 1998 Nov;38(21):3483-5. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00119-9.
10
Failure of concordance of the Farnsworth D15 test and the Nagel anomaloscope matching range in anomalous trichromatism.在异常三色视中, Farnsworth D15测试结果与Nagel色盲检查镜匹配范围不一致。
Vis Neurosci. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):451-3. doi: 10.1017/S0952523808080231.