Conflict Management and Conflict Resolution Programme, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;23(6):533-41. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2011.637905.
The salutogenic theory considers sense of coherence (SOC) as a cross-cultural concept ( Antonovsky, 1987 ), meaning that in all cultures and at all stages of coping with a stressor, a person with a strong SOC is at an advantage in preventing tension from being transformed into stress. However, in seeking to understand how the SOC works, it is culture which seems to define which resources are appropriate. The aim of our paper is to examine this theoretical assumption of Antonovsky. Data on personal and community SOC as well as on stress reactions were gathered after the last fire in northern Israel (December 2010) among adolescents aged 12-18 belonging to three cultural groups (Jews, Druze, Muslims). We compared the pattern of personal versus community SOC in explaining stress reactions in the three cultures. Results indicate that personal SOC was the strongest predictor of stress reactions in all cultures. Community SOC, however, played a significant role mainly for Druze. Results are discussed relating to Antonovsky's theory and to adolescence as a 'universal' period, as well as considering the uniqueness of each culture separately.
健康促进理论认为,健康意识(SOC)是一种跨文化的概念(Antonovsky,1987),这意味着在所有文化和应对压力源的所有阶段,具有强大 SOC 的人在防止紧张转化为压力方面具有优势。然而,在试图理解 SOC 如何发挥作用时,似乎是文化决定了哪些资源是合适的。本文的目的是检验 Antonovsky 的这一理论假设。在以色列北部最后一次火灾(2010 年 12 月)后,我们在属于三个文化群体(犹太教、德鲁兹教、穆斯林)的 12-18 岁青少年中收集了个人和社区 SOC 以及应激反应的数据。我们比较了个人 SOC 与社区 SOC 对三种文化中应激反应的解释模式。结果表明,个人 SOC 是所有文化中应激反应的最强预测因素。然而,社区 SOC 主要对德鲁兹教有显著作用。结果与 Antonovsky 的理论以及青春期作为“普遍”时期有关,并分别考虑了每种文化的独特性。