• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用加纳大学生评估连贯感量表(SOC-L9)的维度:防范方法效应。

Assessing the dimensionality of the sense of coherence scale (SOC-L9) using Ghanaian university students: Guarding against the method effect.

作者信息

Quansah Frank, Agormedah Edmond Kwesi, Srem-Sai Medina, Hagan John Elvis, Schack Thomas

机构信息

Department of Educational Foundations, University of Education, Winneba, P. O. Box 25, Winneba, Ghana.

Department of Business & Social Sciences Education, University of Cape Coast, PMB, Cape Coast, Ghana.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Aug 14;10(16):e36252. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36252. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36252
PMID:39224295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11367501/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The dimensionality of the sense of coherence (SOC-L9) scale has been in contention due to the varied factor structure revealed in the literature. In this study, we assessed the dimensionality of the SOC-L9 scale using Ghanaian university students while guarding against the method effect. The study also examined the gender measurement invariance of the scale.

METHODS

This research conveniently sampled 1062 students who responded to the SOC-L9 scale with negative items reversed to positive items. A larger proportion of the participants were male students (n = 769, 72.4 %), with 293(27.6 %) being female students. The youngest participant was 18 years old, whereas the oldest was 42 years old. Following all validation studies protocols, four distinct confirmatory factor analysis models were fitted and compared (i.e., unidimensional, three-factor first-order, three-factor second-order and bifactor models).

RESULTS

The initial model comparison revealed that the bifactor CFA model [CFI = 0.958, SRMR = 0.036, AIC = 21231.35, BIC = 21370.45] was superior to the unidimensional [CFI = 0.914, SRMR = 0.046, AIC = 26280.67, BIC = 26414.8] and 3-factor models [CFI = 0.932, SRMR = 0.040, AIC = 26221.67, BIC = 26370.71]. Upon further probing, it was discovered that SOC-L9 functions best as a unidimensional scale for the university student population. Gender measurement invariance was established for configural invariance [CFI = 0.986, SRMR = 0.044], metric invariance [CFI = 0.894, SRMR = 0.051] and scalar invariance [CFI = 0.983, SRMR = 0.047].

CONCLUSION

The SOC-L9 scale has a nested structure with the various sub-scales interacting to produce a summary total observed score. The structure of the SOC-L9 requires scholars to treat the scale as a unidimensional scale rather than a multidimensional one. This latent structure was found to be consistent with male and female university students.

摘要

背景

由于文献中揭示的因素结构各异,连贯感量表(SOC-L9)的维度一直存在争议。在本研究中,我们以加纳大学生为样本评估了SOC-L9量表的维度,同时防范方法效应。该研究还检验了该量表在性别上的测量不变性。

方法

本研究方便抽样了1062名学生,他们对SOC-L9量表做出了回应,其中负面项目已反向为正面项目。参与者中男生比例较大(n = 769,72.4%),女生有293人(27.6%)。最年轻的参与者为18岁,最年长的为42岁。按照所有验证性研究方案,拟合并比较了四个不同的验证性因素分析模型(即单维模型、三因素一阶模型、三因素二阶模型和双因素模型)。

结果

初始模型比较显示,双因素验证性因素分析模型[CFI = 0.958,SRMR = 0.036,AIC = 21231.35,BIC = 21370.45]优于单维模型[CFI = 0.914,SRMR = 0.046,AIC = 26280.67,BIC = 26414.8]和三因素模型[CFI = 0.932,SRMR = 0.040,AIC = 26221.67,BIC = 26370.71]。进一步探究发现,对于大学生群体而言,SOC-L9量表作为单维量表的功能最佳。建立了性别测量在构型不变性[CFI = 0.986,SRMR = 0.044]、度量不变性[CFI = 0.894,SRMR = 0.051]和标量不变性[CFI = 0.983,SRMR = 0.047]方面的不变性。

结论

SOC-L9量表具有嵌套结构,各个子量表相互作用以产生一个汇总的总观测分数。SOC-L9量表的结构要求学者将该量表视为单维量表而非多维量表。这种潜在结构在男女大学生中均被发现是一致的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc4/11367501/97606117f227/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc4/11367501/406eee2bd5b7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc4/11367501/97606117f227/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc4/11367501/406eee2bd5b7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc4/11367501/97606117f227/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the dimensionality of the sense of coherence scale (SOC-L9) using Ghanaian university students: Guarding against the method effect.利用加纳大学生评估连贯感量表(SOC-L9)的维度:防范方法效应。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 14;10(16):e36252. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36252. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
2
Validation of the factor structure and psychometric characteristics of the Arabic adaptation of the sense of coherence SOC-13 scale: a confirmatory factor analysis.验证阿拉伯语适应感的结构和心理测量特征的因子结构和心理测量特征SOC-13 量表:验证性因素分析。
BMC Psychol. 2022 May 3;10(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00826-4.
3
Psychometric Properties of the SOC-13 Scale in Colombian Adults.SOC-13 量表在哥伦比亚成年人中的心理测量特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;18(24):13017. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413017.
4
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF): Dimensionality, validity, reliability and gender invariance among Nigerian adolescents.儿童创伤问卷-短式(CTQ-SF):尼日利亚青少年的维度、效度、信度和性别不变性。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Mar;101:104357. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104357. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
5
Structural validity of the Brazilian version of the Sense of Coherence scale (SOC-13) in oral health research: exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.《感知综合性量表(SOC-13)巴西版在口腔健康研究中的结构有效性:探索性和验证性因子分析》
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Aug 9;22(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02373-1.
6
Testing Measurement and Factor Structure Invariance of the Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale for Youth Across Gender.青少年身体活动与休闲动机量表在不同性别间的测试、测量及因素结构不变性研究
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 3;9:1096. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01096. eCollection 2018.
7
The Brief 10-Item Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-Positive Scale (Brief CAPE-P10): Initial psychometric properties, gender measurement invariance and mean differences among Nigerian adolescents.简短 10 项通灵体验阳性量表(Brief CAPE-P10):初步心理计量特性、性别测量不变性以及尼日利亚青少年之间的平均差异。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;14(6):723-733. doi: 10.1111/eip.12903. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
8
Psychometric properties and gender invariance of the 8-item emotion regulation questionnaire (ERQ-8) among Chinese university students.大学生 8 项情绪调节问卷(ERQ-8)的心理计量学特性和性别不变性在中国大学生中的研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0296035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296035. eCollection 2024.
9
Examining the dimensionality, reliability, and invariance of the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale-14: A multicenter cross-sectional survey in Chinese junior nurses.中文版复原力量表-14的维度、信度和不变性检验:一项针对中国初级护士的多中心横断面调查
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 3;13:964151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.964151. eCollection 2022.
10
Children of parents with a mental illness - stigma questionnaire: validation and revision.患有精神疾病父母的子女——耻辱感问卷:验证与修订
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 17;15:1376627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1376627. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Moderation modelling of COVID-19 digital health literacy and sense of coherence across subjective social class and age among university students in Ghana.加纳大学生中 COVID-19 数字健康素养和社会凝聚力的调节模型,跨越主观社会阶层和年龄。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Oct 16;11(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01334-9.
2
Modeling unit non-response and validity of online teaching evaluation in higher education using generalizability theory approach.运用概化理论方法对高等教育中在线教学评价的单位无应答和有效性进行建模。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 4;14:1202896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202896. eCollection 2023.
3
Stress Factors, Stress Levels, and Coping Mechanisms among University Students.
大学生的压力因素、压力水平和应对机制。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2023 Jun 29;2023:2026971. doi: 10.1155/2023/2026971. eCollection 2023.
4
Gender differences in sense of coherence among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey.土耳其 COVID-19 大流行期间大学生的韧性感知中的性别差异。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad048.
5
Subjective social status and well-being of adolescents and young adults in Ghanaian schools: conditional process analysis.加纳学校青少年和年轻人的主观社会地位与幸福感:条件过程分析。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Apr 18;11(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01158-7.
6
A cross-sectional study of university students' pocket money variance and its relationship with digital health literacy and subjective well-being in Ghana.一项关于加纳大学生零花钱差异及其与数字健康素养和主观幸福感关系的横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 4;6(2):e1095. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1095. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Examining the underlying latent structure of the sports emotion questionnaire: Insights from the bifactor multidimensional item response theory.审视体育情感问卷的潜在结构:双因素多维项目反应理论的见解
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:1038217. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1038217. eCollection 2022.
8
Usage of Complementary and Alternative Methods, Lifestyle, and Psychological Variables in Cancer Care.补充和替代医学方法、生活方式和心理变量在癌症护理中的应用。
In Vivo. 2023 Jan-Feb;37(1):106-114. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13059.
9
Predictors of Students' Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impact of Coping Strategies, Sense of Coherence, and Social Support.预测 COVID-19 大流行期间学生的心理健康:应对策略、心理一致感和社会支持的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;19(24):16423. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416423.
10
Sense of coherence, off-job crafting, and mental well-being: A path of positive health development.心理一致感、业余创作和心理健康:积极健康发展的路径。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Dec 1;37(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac159.