• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用棘突间撑开装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症:我们真的能恢复椎间孔高度吗?

Surgical treatment of the spinal stenosis with an interspinous distraction device: do we really restore the foraminal height?

作者信息

Celik Haydar, Derincek Alihan, Koksal Ismet

机构信息

M.H. Beypazarı State Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk Neurosurg. 2012;22(1):50-4. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.4681-11.2.

DOI:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.4681-11.2
PMID:22274971
Abstract

AIM

The aim of implantation of interspinous device is to unload the facet joints, restore foraminal height and provide stability in order to improve the clinical outcome of surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After microsurgical decompression, Coflex™ device was applied. Patients were evaluated at a month after surgery and last follow-up using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Foraminal height and lumbar lordosis angle were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative VAS was 7.85 and fell to 1.7 a month after surgery (p < 0.0001). At the last follow-up the mean VAS score was 1.65 (p < 0.0001). The mean foraminal heights were measured 19.95 mm preoperatively and 25.05 mm a month after surgery (p < 0.0001). The mean foraminal height was 21.60 mm at the last follow-up (p=0.002). The mean lumbar lordosis were measured 32.05 and 34.3 degrees at preoperative and a month after surgery respectively (p=0.155). The mean lumbar lordosis was 32 (±5.99) degrees at the last follow-up (p=0.974).

CONCLUSION

Using the Coflex device is a minimal invasive, effective and safe procedure. Restoration of the foraminal height may not be a responsible factor for clinical improvement. We think microsurgical decompression looks responsible of the good clinical outcome and using interspinous device is unnecessary. Comparative clinical studies can be informative.

摘要

目的

植入棘突间装置的目的是减轻小关节负荷、恢复椎间孔高度并提供稳定性,以改善手术的临床效果。

材料与方法

在进行显微减压术后,应用Coflex™装置。在术后1个月及末次随访时,使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数(ODI)对患者进行评估。记录椎间孔高度和腰椎前凸角。

结果

术前VAS平均为7.85,术后1个月降至1.7(p<0.0001)。在末次随访时,VAS平均评分为1.65(p<0.0001)。术前椎间孔平均高度为19.95mm,术后1个月为25.05mm(p<0.0001)。末次随访时椎间孔平均高度为21.60mm(p=0.002)。术前和术后1个月腰椎前凸平均分别为32.05°和34.3°(p=0.155)。末次随访时腰椎前凸平均为32(±5.99)°(p=0.974)。

结论

使用Coflex装置是一种微创、有效且安全的手术方法。椎间孔高度的恢复可能不是临床改善的责任因素。我们认为显微减压似乎是良好临床效果的原因,使用棘突间装置是不必要的。比较性临床研究可能会提供有用信息。

相似文献

1
Surgical treatment of the spinal stenosis with an interspinous distraction device: do we really restore the foraminal height?使用棘突间撑开装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症:我们真的能恢复椎间孔高度吗?
Turk Neurosurg. 2012;22(1):50-4. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.4681-11.2.
2
Does an interspinous device (Coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients.棘突间装置(Coflex)是否能改善腰椎管狭窄症减压手术后的疗效?一项前瞻性病例对照研究的 60 例患者 1 年随访结果。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Feb;19(2):283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1229-9. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
3
[Step treatment strategy of degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spinal stenosis].[退变性腰椎侧凸和椎管狭窄的阶梯治疗策略]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Aug;25(8):951-5.
4
Two-year follow-up after decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study.腰椎管狭窄减压手术联合与不联合棘突间装置植入的两年随访:一项前瞻性对照研究。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Aug;27(6):336-41. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31825f7203.
5
[The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].[用于治疗腰骶部脊柱退行性疾病的DIAM脊柱稳定系统]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Oct;76(5):417-23.
6
[Radiographic study of Coflex interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis].[Coflex棘突间装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症的影像学研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 1;54(7):513-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2016.07.008.
7
Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.退行性腰椎管狭窄减压手术后患者临床评估与自我评估的前瞻性分析
Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
8
Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.经皮棘突间撑开器植入术与开放式减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Spine J. 2011 Oct;11(10):933-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.419.
9
Predictors of Clinical Outcome After Endoscopic Partial Facetectomy for Degenerative Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis.内镜下腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症部分减压术后临床转归的预测因素。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e1482-e1488. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.126. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
10
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lytic spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗椎体溶解性滑脱:使用插入旋转式椎间融合器恢复矢状面平衡
Spine J. 2005 Mar-Apr;5(2):161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.256.

引用本文的文献

1
Five-year radiological outcomes between decompression alone and decompression with an interlaminar device for lumbar spinal stenosis.单纯减压与使用椎间融合器减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的五年影像学结果。
J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):488-500. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-33. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
2
Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.棘突间装置在老年腰椎退变患者中是否安全有效?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08119-z. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
3
Evaluating 5-year outcomes of interlaminar devices as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
评估作为减压辅助手段的层间装置治疗有症状腰椎椎管狭窄症的 5 年结果。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Apr;32(4):1367-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07610-x. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
4
[Mid-term effectiveness of Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation combined with spinal fusion for lumbar disc degeneration].Coflex棘突间动态内固定联合脊柱融合术治疗腰椎间盘退变的中期疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 15;33(3):280-286. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201807099.
5
Spinal Stenosis in the Absence of Spondylolisthesis: Can Interlaminar Stabilization at Single and Multi-levels Provide Sustainable Relief?无椎体滑脱的腰椎管狭窄症:单节段和多节段椎板间稳定术能否提供持久缓解?
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Mar 30;12(1):64-69. doi: 10.14444/5011. eCollection 2018 Jan.
6
ISASS Recommendations/Coverage Criteria for Decompression with Interlaminar Stabilization - Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity.ISASS关于椎板间稳定减压术的推荐/覆盖标准 - 覆盖指征、局限性和/或医疗必要性
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Dec 5;10:41. doi: 10.14444/3041. eCollection 2016.
7
Interspinous process devices for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.用于治疗神经源性间歇性跛行的棘突间装置:随机对照试验的系统评价
Neurosurg Rev. 2017 Oct;40(4):529-536. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0722-y. Epub 2016 May 14.
8
Interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to fusion versus double-segment fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disease with a minimum follow-up of three years.与双节段融合术相比,棘突间动态稳定术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效:至少三年的随访结果
Int Orthop. 2016 Jun;40(6):1275-83. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3199-y. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
9
Superior outcomes of decompression with an interlaminar dynamic device versus decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and back pain: a cross registry study.与单纯减压相比,使用椎板间动态装置减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症和背痛患者的疗效更佳:一项跨注册研究。
Eur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2228-35. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4124-6. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
10
Magnetic resonance imaging on disc degeneration changes after implantation of an interspinous spacer and fusion of the adjacent segment.棘突间撑开器植入及相邻节段融合后椎间盘退变变化的磁共振成像
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Apr 15;8(4):6097-102. eCollection 2015.