Royall J, Lyon B
National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Afr Health Sci. 2011 Sep;11(3):457-63.
Health professionals in developing countries want access to information to help them make changes in health care and contribute to medical research. However, they face challenges of technology limitations, lack of training, and, on the village level, culture and language. This report focuses on the U.S. National Library of Medicine experience with access: for the international medical/scientific community to health information which has been published by researchers in developing countries; for scientists and clinicians in developing countries to their own literature and to that of their colleagues around the world; for medical librarians who are a critical conduit for students, faculty, researchers, and, increasingly, the general public; and for the front line workers at the health center in the village at the end of the line. The fundamental question of whether or not information communication technology can make a difference in access and subsequently in health is illustrated by an anecdote regarding an early intervention in Africa in 1992. From that point, we examine programs to improve access involving malaria researchers, medical journal editors, librarians, and medical students working with local health center staff in the village. Although access is a reality, the positive change in health that the information technology intervention might produce often remains a mirage. Information and technology are not static elements in the equation for better access. They must function together, creating a dialectic in which they transform and inform one another and those whom their combination touches.
发展中国家的卫生专业人员希望获取信息,以帮助他们改变医疗保健方式并为医学研究做出贡献。然而,他们面临技术限制、缺乏培训的挑战,在乡村层面还面临文化和语言方面的问题。本报告重点关注美国国立医学图书馆在信息获取方面的经验:为国际医学/科学界提供发展中国家研究人员发表的健康信息;为发展中国家的科学家和临床医生提供他们自己的文献以及世界各地同行的文献;为医学图书馆员提供信息,医学图书馆员是学生、教师、研究人员以及越来越多的普通公众获取信息的关键渠道;为处于最基层的乡村卫生中心的一线工作人员提供信息。1992年在非洲进行的一次早期干预的轶事说明了信息通信技术能否在信息获取以及随后的健康状况方面产生影响这一根本问题。从那时起,我们考察了旨在改善信息获取的项目,这些项目涉及疟疾研究人员、医学期刊编辑、图书馆员以及与乡村当地卫生中心工作人员合作的医学生。尽管信息获取已成为现实,但信息技术干预可能带来的健康方面的积极变化往往仍是海市蜃楼。在改善信息获取的等式中,信息和技术并非静态元素。它们必须协同发挥作用,形成一种辩证关系,在这种关系中它们相互转化、相互提供信息,并影响其结合所涉及的人群。