Kikuchi Y, Iwano I, Miyauchi M, Sasa H, Nagata I, Kuki E
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.
Gynecol Oncol. 1990 Nov;39(2):199-203. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90432-k.
In the present study, we attempted to determine effects of calmodulin antagonists (W-7 and W-5) on cisplatin uptake by human ovarian cancer cells, using KF cells derived from serous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary and cisplatin-resistant cells (KFr). The degree of cisplatin resistance of the KFr cells was about 3.7-fold higher than that of the parent KF cells, with regard to the concentration of cisplatin required for 50% inhibition of cell proliferation (IC50). When KF and KFr cells were incubated with 10 micrograms/ml cisplatin for 4 hr, cisplatin-content in the KF cells was significantly higher than that in the KFr cells. When KF cells were incubated in the presence of W-7 (but not W-5), cisplatin uptake significantly increased, compared to cells treated with cisplatin alone. On the other hand, when KFr cells were incubated in the presence of 5 micrograms/ml W-7 or W-5, cisplatin uptake was significantly higher than uptake by KFr cells treated with cisplatin alone, being comparable to that by KF cells treated with cisplatin alone. Such an increase in cisplatin uptake seemed to bring about adjuvant effects to cisplatin of KFr cell proliferation in vitro. The KF tumor grown in nude mice took up 24.8 ng/g dry wt of cisplatin 4 hr after intraperitoneal administration. When cisplatin was administered with calmodulin antagonists, cisplatin uptake by the KF and KFr tumors was significantly increased, compared to that after treatment with cisplatin alone. In particular, the cisplatin uptake by the KFr tumor was about 2.5-fold higher than that by the KFr tumor treated with cisplatin alone. These results suggest that coadministration of calmodulin antagonists and cisplatin may be of use in patients with refractory ovarian cancer.