• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知晓与否?这并非家族性乳腺癌风险沟通中的唯一问题。

To know or not to know? Not the only question in familial breast cancer risk communication.

作者信息

Maddock C, Schrijvers D, Turco Mrd, Marotti L, Sullivan R

机构信息

On Behalf of TENOVUS, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Ecancermedicalscience. 2011;5:239. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2011.239. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2011.239
PMID:22276070
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3251510/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in females, 5-10% of these breast cancers occur in women because of an inherited mutation. The term 'risk' in relation to familial cancer can have multiple meanings for both clinicians and patients. Failing to identify and address this may impair effective communication and informed decision making and adversely affect the quality of patient care. The aim of this research for the Eurocancercoms project was to explore patients' experience of risk communication in breast cancer and to investigate a mechanism for sharing these experiences using a filmed round-table discussion (RTD).

METHODS

A filmed RTD with six women who had experience of, or some connection with familial breast cancer was conducted. Criteria for inclusion included a willingness and ability to participate in the discussion in English and to be prepared for the discussion to be hosted online with opportunities for others to view and comment.

RESULTS

The main findings are presented as key themes and issues arising from the RTD. There was consistency in the group on the need for improvements to the risk communication process as a whole and in particular around onward diffusion of information i.e. 'Telling the family'. There were differences regarding 'wanting to know' their genetic status.

CONCLUSIONS

The perception of cancer risk in the narratives stems not only from the way risks are stated, but from family history, personal experiences, cultural norms and beliefs and therefore a multifaceted approach to risk communication addressing these issues is necessary to ensure the patient fully understands the potential risks. There is a balance when attending to patient's information needs, as to what level and amount of information is required by the individual at a particular time and communicators need to be able to tailor information accordingly.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌是女性中最常被诊断出的癌症,也是癌症死亡的主要原因,其中5%-10%的乳腺癌发生在因遗传突变而患病的女性身上。对于临床医生和患者而言,与家族性癌症相关的“风险”一词可能有多种含义。未能识别和解决这一问题可能会损害有效的沟通和明智的决策,并对患者护理质量产生不利影响。欧洲癌症沟通项目的这项研究旨在探索患者在乳腺癌风险沟通方面的经历,并研究一种通过拍摄圆桌讨论(RTD)来分享这些经历的机制。

方法

对六位有家族性乳腺癌经历或与之有某种关联的女性进行了拍摄的圆桌讨论。纳入标准包括愿意且有能力用英语参与讨论,并准备好在网上进行讨论,以便其他人有机会观看和评论。

结果

主要研究结果以圆桌讨论中出现的关键主题和问题呈现。该小组在整体风险沟通流程改进的必要性上达成了一致,特别是在信息的进一步传播方面,即“告知家人”。在“想知道”自己的基因状况方面存在差异。

结论

叙述中对癌症风险的认知不仅源于风险的表述方式,还源于家族病史、个人经历、文化规范和信仰,因此,采取多方面的风险沟通方法来解决这些问题对于确保患者充分理解潜在风险是必要的。在关注患者信息需求时,需要在特定时间个人所需信息的水平和数量之间找到平衡,沟通者需要能够据此调整信息。

相似文献

1
To know or not to know? Not the only question in familial breast cancer risk communication.知晓与否?这并非家族性乳腺癌风险沟通中的唯一问题。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2011;5:239. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2011.239. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
2
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
6
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
Thinking ahead about medical treatments in advanced illness: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers in end-of-life care planning with patients and families from ethnically diverse backgrounds.预先思考晚期疾病的医疗治疗:对不同种族背景的终末期患者和家庭进行临终关怀规划的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(7):1-135. doi: 10.3310/JVFW4781.
9
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
10
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.

引用本文的文献

1
The KinFact intervention - a randomized controlled trial to increase family communication about cancer history.亲属因素干预——一项旨在增加家庭关于癌症病史沟通的随机对照试验。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Oct;23(10):806-16. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4754.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition: cancer burden and responsibility.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌易感基因检测:癌症负担和责任。
J Health Psychol. 2002 Jul;7(4):469-84. doi: 10.1177/1359105302007004627.
2
Online information as a decision making aid for cancer patients: recommendations from the Eurocancercoms project.在线信息作为癌症患者的决策辅助工具:Eurocancercoms 项目的建议。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 May;48(7):1055-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.08.018. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
3
Global cancer statistics.全球癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
4
Comparing family members' motivations and attitudes towards genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a qualitative analysis.比较家族成员对遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌基因检测的动机和态度:定性分析。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Dec;18(12):1289-95. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.114. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
5
How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map.如何为患者开发基于网络的决策支持干预措施:过程图。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Feb;82(2):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.034. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
6
Women's decision making about risk-reducing strategies in the context of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌背景下女性关于降低风险策略的决策:一项系统综述
J Genet Couns. 2009 Dec;18(6):578-97. doi: 10.1007/s10897-009-9245-9. Epub 2009 Oct 3.
7
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
8
Psychosocial aspects of risk appraisal.风险评估的社会心理因素
Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S14. doi: 10.1186/bcr2174. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
9
Interactive patient decision aids for women facing genetic testing for familial breast cancer: a systematic web and literature review.面向面临家族性乳腺癌基因检测的女性的交互式患者决策辅助工具:一项系统性网络及文献综述
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Feb;14(1):70-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00798.x.
10
Interventions to improve risk communication in clinical genetics: systematic review.改善临床遗传学风险沟通的干预措施:系统评价
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Apr;71(1):4-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.026. Epub 2008 Jan 18.