Evolutionary Biology, Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 May;27(5):260-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
Recently, several authors have challenged the view that anisogamy, the defining feature of the sexes, is an important determinant of the evolution of sex roles. Sex roles are instead suggested to result from chance, or from non-heritable differences in life histories of females and males. Here, we take issue with these ideas. We note that random processes alone cannot cause consistent differences between the sexes, and that those differences between the sexes in life histories that affect the sex roles are themselves the result of sex-specific selection that can ultimately be traced back to anisogamy. To understand sex roles, one should ask how environmental variation and female-male coevolution cause variation in sex-specific selection in the light of anisogamy.
最近,一些作者对有性别的定义特征——雌雄配子大小差异(anisogamy)是性别角色进化的重要决定因素这一观点提出了质疑。相反,他们认为性别角色是由偶然因素或雌性和雄性的生活史中的非遗传性差异决定的。在这里,我们对这些观点提出质疑。我们注意到,仅随机过程不能导致雌雄之间的一致性差异,而那些影响性别角色的雌雄之间的生活史差异本身就是性别特异性选择的结果,而这种选择最终可以追溯到雌雄配子大小差异。为了理解性别角色,人们应该在雌雄配子大小差异的背景下,询问环境变化和雌雄共同进化如何导致性别特异性选择的变化。