Mannelli Paolo, Peindl Kathleen S, Lee Tong, Bhatia Kamal S, Wu Li-Tzy
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2012 Mar;5(1):52-63. doi: 10.2174/1874473711205010052.
Constant refinement of opioid dependence (OD) therapies is a condition to promote treatment access and delivery. Among other applications, the partial opioid agonist buprenorphine has been studied to improve evidence-based interventions for the transfer of patients from opioid agonist to antagonist medications. This paper summarizes PubMed-searched clinical investigations and conference papers on the transition from methadone maintenance to buprenorphine and from buprenorphine to naltrexone, discussing challenges and advances. The majority of the 26 studies we examined were uncontrolled investigations. Many small clinical trials have demonstrated the feasibility of in- or outpatient transfer to buprenorphine from low to moderate methadone doses (up to 60-70 mg). Results on the conversion from higher methadone doses, on the other hand, indicate significant withdrawal discomfort, and need for ancillary medications and inpatient treatment. Tapering high methadone doses before the transfer to buprenorphine is not without discomfort and the risk of relapse. The transition buprenorphine-naltrexone has been explored in several pilot studies, and a number of treatment methods to reduce withdrawal intensity warrant further investigation, including the co-administration of buprenorphine and naltrexone. Outpatient transfer protocols using buprenorphine, and direct comparisons with other modalities of transitioning from opioid agonist to antagonist medications are limited. Given its potential salience, the information gathered should be used in larger clinical trials on short and long-term outcomes of opioid agonist-antagonist transition treatments. Future studies should also test new pharmacological mechanisms to help reduce physical dependence, and identify individualized approaches, including the use of pharmacogenetics and long-acting opioid agonist and antagonist formulations.
不断完善阿片类药物依赖(OD)治疗方法是促进治疗可及性和实施的一个条件。在其他应用中,已对部分阿片类激动剂丁丙诺啡进行了研究,以改进将患者从阿片类激动剂药物转换为拮抗剂药物的循证干预措施。本文总结了通过检索PubMed获得的关于从美沙酮维持治疗转换为丁丙诺啡以及从丁丙诺啡转换为纳曲酮的临床研究和会议论文,讨论了其中的挑战和进展。我们审查的26项研究中,大多数是无对照研究。许多小型临床试验已证明,门诊或住院患者从低至中等剂量美沙酮(最高60 - 70毫克)转换为丁丙诺啡是可行的。另一方面,从较高剂量美沙酮转换的结果表明,会出现明显的戒断不适,并且需要辅助药物和住院治疗。在转换为丁丙诺啡之前逐渐减少高剂量美沙酮并非没有不适和复发风险。丁丙诺啡 - 纳曲酮转换已在多项试点研究中进行了探索,一些降低戒断强度的治疗方法值得进一步研究,包括丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮联合使用。使用丁丙诺啡的门诊转换方案以及与从阿片类激动剂转换为拮抗剂药物的其他方式的直接比较都很有限。鉴于其潜在的重要性,所收集的信息应用于关于阿片类激动剂 - 拮抗剂转换治疗短期和长期结果的更大规模临床试验。未来的研究还应测试有助于减少身体依赖的新药理学机制,并确定个体化方法,包括使用药物遗传学以及长效阿片类激动剂和拮抗剂制剂。