• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欠发达国家预期寿命的政治和社会决定因素:一项纵向研究。

Political and social determinants of life expectancy in less developed countries: a longitudinal study.

机构信息

Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Room 722, No, 17, Xuzhou Road, Taipei City 100, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 27;12:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-85.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-85
PMID:22280469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3331806/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the longitudinal contributions of four political and socioeconomic factors to the increase in life expectancy in less developed countries (LDCs) between 1970 and 2004.

METHODS

We collected 35 years of annual data for 119 LDCs on life expectancy at birth and on four key socioeconomic indicators: economy, measured by log10 gross domestic product per capita at purchasing power parity; educational environment, measured by the literacy rate of the adult population aged 15 years and over; nutritional status, measured by the proportion of undernourished people in the population; and political regime, measured by the regime score from the Polity IV database. Using linear mixed models, we analyzed the longitudinal effects of these multiple factors on life expectancy at birth with a lag of 0-10 years, adjusting for both time and regional correlations.

RESULTS

The LDCs' increases in life expectancy over time were associated with all four factors. Political regime had the least influence on increased life expectancy to begin with, but became significant starting in the 3rd year and continued to increase, while the impact of the other socioeconomic factors began strong but continually decreased over time. The combined effects of these four socioeconomic and political determinants contributed 54.74% - 98.16% of the life expectancy gains throughout the lag periods of 0-10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Though the effect of democratic politics on increasing life expectancy was relatively small in the short term when compared to the effects of the other socioeconomic factors, the long-term impact of democracy should not be underestimated.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在考察四个政治和社会经济因素对 1970 年至 2004 年间较不发达国家(LDCs)预期寿命增长的长期贡献。

方法

我们收集了 119 个 LDCs 的 35 年的出生预期寿命数据和四个关键社会经济指标的数据:经济,以人均国内生产总值(按购买力平价计算的对数)衡量;教育环境,以 15 岁及以上成年人口的识字率衡量;营养状况,以人口中营养不良者的比例衡量;政治制度,以 Polity IV 数据库中的制度评分衡量。使用线性混合模型,我们分析了这些多种因素对出生时预期寿命的纵向影响,同时考虑了时间和区域相关性的影响。

结果

随着时间的推移,LDCs 的预期寿命增加与所有四个因素有关。政治制度一开始对预期寿命的增加影响最小,但从第 3 年开始变得显著,并持续增加,而其他社会经济因素的影响开始较强,但随着时间的推移持续下降。这四个社会经济和政治决定因素的综合影响在 0-10 年的滞后期内对预期寿命的提高贡献了 54.74%-98.16%。

结论

虽然与其他社会经济因素相比,民主政治对提高预期寿命的短期影响相对较小,但民主的长期影响不应被低估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f909/3331806/70c2f7c153cc/1471-2458-12-85-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f909/3331806/0877848e2c21/1471-2458-12-85-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f909/3331806/70c2f7c153cc/1471-2458-12-85-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f909/3331806/0877848e2c21/1471-2458-12-85-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f909/3331806/70c2f7c153cc/1471-2458-12-85-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Political and social determinants of life expectancy in less developed countries: a longitudinal study.欠发达国家预期寿命的政治和社会决定因素:一项纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 27;12:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-85.
2
Political and economic characteristics as moderators of the relationship between health services and infant mortality in less-developed countries.政治和经济特征对欠发达国家卫生服务与婴儿死亡率关系的调节作用。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Dec 1;67(12):1006-12. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202685. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
3
Regional differences in trends in life expectancy and the influence of the political and socioeconomic contexts in Germany.德国预期寿命趋势的地区差异以及政治和社会经济背景的影响。
Int J Health Serv. 2003;33(4):669-86; discussion 743-9. doi: 10.2190/NPQK-1TU5-9Q5X-189J.
4
Fertility, development, and family planning, 1970-1980: an analysis of cases weighted by population.1970 - 1980年的生育、发展与计划生育:基于人口加权的案例分析
Stud Comp Int Dev. 1987 Fall;22(3):103-27. doi: 10.1007/BF02687145.
5
Priorities for action on the social determinants of health: Empirical evidence on the strongest associations with life expectancy in 54 low-income countries, 1990-2012.健康社会决定因素的行动重点:1990 - 2012年54个低收入国家与预期寿命最强关联的实证证据
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Oct;167:88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.035. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
6
Socio-economic correlates of life expectancy at birth--the case of developing countries.出生时预期寿命的社会经济关联因素——以发展中国家为例。
Ingu Pogon Nonjip. 1989 Dec;9(2):214-26.
7
Why do some countries do better or worse in life expectancy relative to income? An analysis of Brazil, Ethiopia, and the United States of America.为什么一些国家在预期寿命方面相对于收入表现得更好或更差?对巴西、埃塞俄比亚和美利坚合众国的分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Nov 10;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01315-z.
8
Life expectancy in less developed countries: socioeconomic development or public health?欠发达国家的预期寿命:社会经济发展还是公共卫生?
J Biosoc Sci. 1989 Apr;21(2):245-52. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000017934.
9
Variations in life expectancy in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries--1985-2010.经济合作与发展组织国家1985 - 2010年预期寿命的变化
Scand J Public Health. 2015 Dec;43(8):786-95. doi: 10.1177/1403494815597357. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
10
Mortality and development revisited.死亡率与发展再探讨。
Popul Bull UN. 1985(18):34-40.

引用本文的文献

1
The long-term effect of social, educational, and health expenditures on indicators of life expectancy: an empirical analysis for the OECD countries.社会、教育和卫生支出对预期寿命指标的长期影响:经合组织国家的实证分析
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;12:1497794. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1497794. eCollection 2024.
2
Estimates of life expectancy and premature mortality among multidimensional poor and non-poor in India.印度多维贫困和非贫困人口的预期寿命及过早死亡率估计。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):3546. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20966-z.
3
Health outcome convergence and the roles of public health financing and governance in Africa.

本文引用的文献

1
The process of empowerment: a model for use in research and practice.赋权过程:一个用于研究和实践的模型。
Am Psychol. 2010 Oct;65(7):646-59. doi: 10.1037/a0018854.
2
Reducing health inequities in a generation: a dream or reality?在一代人的时间内减少健康不平等:梦想还是现实?
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Feb;87(2):84. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.062695.
3
New challenges in studying nutrition-disease interactions in the developing world.发展中世界营养与疾病相互作用研究中的新挑战。
卫生结果趋同与非洲公共卫生筹资和治理的作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 15;19(10):e0312089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312089. eCollection 2024.
4
Impact of education and income inequalities on life expectancy: insights from the new EU members.教育和收入不平等对预期寿命的影响:来自新欧盟成员国的见解。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 21;12:1397585. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1397585. eCollection 2024.
5
Six-Decade Trend Analysis of Life Expectancy at Birth in Asia, Regions of Asia and Iran: A Joinpoint Analysis.亚洲、亚洲各区域及伊朗出生时预期寿命的六十年趋势分析:一项Joinpoint分析
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022 Dec 23;36:166. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.166. eCollection 2022.
6
The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) on Health Outcomes: A Mediating Effect Analysis Based on Cross-National Panel Data.信息和通信技术(ICTs)对健康结果的影响:基于跨国面板数据的中介效应分析。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;2022:2225723. doi: 10.1155/2022/2225723. eCollection 2022.
7
Impacts from Economic Development and Environmental Factors on Life Expectancy: A Comparative Study Based on Data from Both Developed and Developing Countries from 2004 to 2016.经济发展和环境因素对预期寿命的影响:基于 2004 年至 2016 年发达国家和发展中国家数据的比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 13;18(16):8559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168559.
8
The Power of Multidimensional Poverty in Explaining Life Expectancy: Empirical Evidence from Cross-Sectional Data of 62 Developing Countries.多维贫困在解释预期寿命方面的作用:来自62个发展中国家横断面数据的实证证据。
Iran J Public Health. 2020 Sep;49(9):1709-1717. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v49i9.4088.
9
Life Expectancy in Chinese Cities: Spatially Varied Role of Socioeconomic Development, Population Structure, and Natural Conditions.中国城市的预期寿命:社会经济发展、人口结构和自然条件的空间差异作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 10;17(18):6597. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186597.
10
Poverty, Income, and Unemployment as Determinants of Life Expectancy: Empirical Evidence from Panel Data of Thirteen Malaysian States.贫困、收入与失业对预期寿命的影响:来自马来西亚十三个州面板数据的实证证据
Iran J Public Health. 2020 Feb;49(2):294-303.
J Clin Invest. 2008 Apr;118(4):1322-9. doi: 10.1172/JCI34034.
4
Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences.母婴营养不良:全球及区域影响因素与健康后果
Lancet. 2008 Jan 19;371(9608):243-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61690-0.
5
Achieving health equity: from root causes to fair outcomes.实现健康公平:从根本原因到公平结果。
Lancet. 2007 Sep 29;370(9593):1153-63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61385-3.
6
Socioeconomic determinants of infant mortality: a worldwide study of 152 low-, middle-, and high-income countries.婴儿死亡率的社会经济决定因素:对152个低收入、中等收入和高收入国家的全球研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(3):288-97. doi: 10.1080/14034940600979171.
7
Literacy not intelligence moderates the relationships between economic development, income inequality and health.是文化素养而非智力调节了经济发展、收入不平等与健康之间的关系。
Br J Health Psychol. 2007 May;12(Pt 2):179-84. doi: 10.1348/135910707X178128.
8
Health inequalities across the globe demand new global policies.全球范围内的健康不平等问题需要新的全球政策。
Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(2):113-5. doi: 10.1080/14034940701217679.
9
Emerging health issues: the widening challenge for population health promotion.新出现的健康问题:对促进人群健康的挑战日益扩大。
Health Promot Int. 2006 Dec;21 Suppl 1:15-24. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal047.
10
Global health inequalities: an international comparison.全球健康不平等:一项国际比较。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Nov;60(11):928-36. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.041954.