Karjalainen T, He M, Chong A K S, Lim A Y T, Ryhanen J
Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Feb;37(2):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.039.
New, stronger suture materials have been introduced for flexor tendon surgery. The advantage of these materials can be lost if the suture loop pulls out from the tendon. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of various locking loops to grip the tendon.
We inserted 4 different standard and 2 experimental locking loops with 200-μm nitinol wire into human cadaveric flexor digitorum profundus tendons. The standard loops were: group 1, cruciate; group 2, Pennington modified Kessler; group 3, cross-stitch; and group 4, Lim-Tsai. The experimental loops were: group 5, a composition of Pennington modified Kessler with a cross-stitch loop; and group 6, a locking Kessler type of loop with a superficial transverse component. We loaded the loops until failure. We recorded the pull-out strength and stiffness and documented failure mechanisms during the pull-out test.
The cruciate loop had the weakest holding capacity, 20 N, which was significantly less than in groups 2 to 6. The cross-stitch loop, Lim-Tsai loop, and modified Kessler loop performed similarly (36 N, 37 N, and 39 N, respectively). The experimental loops had the highest pull-out strength (group 5, 59 N; and group 6, 60 N, both significantly greater than groups 1 to 4). The mode of failure was pull-out for all of the standard loops and 7 of the experimental loops. Of 20 experimental loops, 13 failed by suture rupture.
The 2 experimental loop configurations demonstrated higher pull-out strength and may have advantages when used with newer and stronger suture materials. The number of the locking components in the loops and the way the tension is transmitted to the tendon fibrils explain the results.
The loops presented in this study and that grip the tendon better may be useful with new materials that have high tensile strength.
新型、更强的缝合材料已被引入用于屈肌腱手术。如果缝合线环从肌腱中拔出,这些材料的优势可能会丧失。本研究的目的是比较各种锁定环固定肌腱的能力。
我们将4种不同的标准锁定环和2种实验性锁定环,用200μm的镍钛诺丝插入人体尸体的指深屈肌腱中。标准环分别为:第1组,十字形;第2组,彭宁顿改良凯斯勒;第3组,十字缝合法;第4组,林-蔡氏。实验环分别为:第5组,彭宁顿改良凯斯勒与十字缝合法环的组合;第6组,带有浅横部的锁定凯斯勒式环。我们对环加载直至失效。记录拔出强度和刚度,并记录拔出试验中的失效机制。
十字形环的固定能力最弱,为20N,明显低于第2至6组。十字缝合法环、林-蔡氏环和改良凯斯勒环的表现相似(分别为36N、37N和39N)。实验环的拔出强度最高(第5组为59N;第6组为60N,均显著高于第1至4组)。所有标准环和7个实验环的失效模式为拔出。在20个实验环中,13个因缝线断裂而失效。
这两种实验性环构型显示出更高的拔出强度,并且在与更新更强的缝合材料一起使用时可能具有优势。环中锁定部件的数量以及张力传递到肌腱纤维的方式解释了结果。
本研究中所呈现的、能更好固定肌腱的环,可能对具有高拉伸强度的新材料有用。