Suppr超能文献

二极管激光(980nm)前列腺剜除术:经尿道前列腺切除术的一种有前途的替代方法。

Diode laser (980 nm) enucleation of the prostate: a promising alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate.

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei Branch, 289, Jianguo Road, Xindian, New Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Feb;28(2):353-60. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-1046-3. Epub 2012 Jan 27.

Abstract

With good hemostatic ability, the end-firing continuous-wave diode laser at 980 nm was used to enucleate the prostate (DiLEP) for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). The study compared the patients' demographics and surgical outcomes between DiLEP and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients with significant BPO and a total prostatic weight of 40 g or more who had undergone DiLEP (n = 74) or TURP (n = 52) during the same period at our hospital were enrolled for analysis. DiLEP was performed by a single surgeon (Yang), and TURP by three surgeons (Yang, Hsieh and Chang). The 4-U incision technique was developed for DiLEP. The diode laser ensured bloodless incision followed by blunt dissection using the resectoscope and laser fiber as an 'index finger' to enucleate the prostate. To prevent unexpected deep thermal damage, the power of the laser was set at 80 W and the laser beam was directed towards the bladder neck and not towards the prostatic capsule. Demographic data and perioperative parameters were comparable between the two groups, except that DiLEP resulted in a significantly lower drop in hemoglobin level (0.9 ± 1.0 vs. 1.6 ± 2.4 g/dl, p = 0.03), shorter catheterization time (41.2 ± 19.9 vs. 67.7 ± 33.3 h, p = 0.01), and shorter postoperative stay (2.9 ± 1.9 vs. 4.1 ± 6.2 days, p = 00.01). Delayed postoperative sloughing of necrotic tissue was not observed in the DiLEP group. Improvements in voiding parameters were comparable between the groups, and were sustained during a follow-up of up to 1 year. DiLEP provided better hemostasis than TURP as evidenced by less blood loss. The role of DiLEP treating BPO requires further investigation.

摘要

采用止血效果良好的 980nm 端射连续波二极管激光行前列腺剜除术(DiLEP)治疗良性前列腺梗阻(BPO)。本研究比较了 DiLEP 与经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)治疗 BPO 的患者的一般资料和手术结果。我们医院同期为有明显 BPO 且前列腺总重量超过 40g 的患者进行 DiLEP(n=74)或 TURP(n=52)治疗。由一位外科医生(杨)施行 DiLEP,由三位外科医生(杨、谢和常)施行 TURP。DiLEP 采用 4-U 切口技术,将电切镜和激光光纤作为“食指”,先以激光无血切割,然后钝性剥离,剜除前列腺。为防止意外的深层热损伤,将激光功率设置为 80W,将激光束对准膀胱颈部,而不是前列腺包膜。两组患者的一般资料和围手术期参数相似,除了 DiLEP 组血红蛋白水平下降幅度明显较低(0.9±1.0 vs. 1.6±2.4g/dl,p=0.03),导尿管留置时间较短(41.2±19.9 vs. 67.7±33.3h,p=0.01),术后住院时间较短(2.9±1.9 vs. 4.1±6.2d,p=0.01)外。DiLEP 组未见术后坏死组织延迟脱落。两组患者的排尿参数改善情况相似,随访 1 年时仍持续。DiLEP 比 TURP 具有更好的止血效果,出血量更少。DiLEP 治疗 BPO 的效果尚需进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验