Family Studies and Human Services, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2012 Jan;38(1):220-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00245.x. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
This article reviews changes in the research literature on intimate partner violence (IPV) since our earlier review (Stith, Rosen, & McCollum, 2003). A rationale for systemic treatment of IPV has emerged from research that has continued to document the limited effectiveness of single-gender treatment approaches for offenders and that has identified subtypes of abusive relationships, including situational couple violence, which often includes the reciprocal use of violence. Consistent findings from the available outcome research have demonstrated that for carefully screened couples who choose to stay together, systemic interventions decrease incidences of IPV and decrease the risk factors for IPV with no increase in risk. Implications for research and treatment are offered.
本文回顾了自我们之前的综述（Stith、Rosen 和 McCollum，2003）以来，亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）研究文献中的变化。从研究中出现了对 IPV 进行系统治疗的基本原理，该研究继续记录了单一性别治疗方法对罪犯的效果有限，并且确定了包括情境夫妻暴力在内的虐待关系亚类，这种暴力通常包括相互使用暴力。现有结果研究的一致发现表明，对于经过精心筛选并选择继续在一起的夫妇，系统干预可降低 IPV 的发生率，并降低 IPV 的风险因素，而不会增加风险。提供了对研究和治疗的影响。
