• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心随机临床试验比较了在初发原生冠状动脉病变中应用 Amphilimus 与紫杉醇洗脱支架的效果。

A multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus- with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions.

机构信息

Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.009
PMID:22284328
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to demonstrate the noninferiority of polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents (Cre8, CID, Saluggia, Italy) versus permanent-polymer paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus Liberté, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) in de novo percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND

Although the efficacy of the drug-eluting stent has been well established, the risk-benefit balance is still suboptimal, and the safety of polymers remains uncertain.

METHODS

Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions were randomly assigned 1:1 to Cre8 or Taxus Liberté stents. Primary endpoint was 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) within a noninferiority scope. Six-month intravascular ultrasound was performed in 20% of the patients. All patients will be clinically followed up to 5 years.

RESULTS

Out of 323 patients enrolled, 162 received Cre8 and 161 Taxus Liberté stents. In-stent LLL was significantly lower in Cre8 group (0.14 ± 0.36 mm vs. 0.34 ± 0.40 mm, p noninferiority <0.0001, p superiority <0.0001). Clinical endpoints (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis) up to 12 months did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The Cre8 stent in de novo lesions showed significantly lower in-stent LLL at 6 months than the Taxus Liberté stent did, with a trend toward better 12-month clinical safety and efficacy results. (International Randomized Comparison Between DES Limus Carbostent and Taxus Drug-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions [NEXT]; NCT01373502).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在证明无聚合物阿米利姆斯洗脱支架(Cre8,CID,Saluggia,意大利)与永久性聚合物紫杉醇洗脱支架(Taxus Liberté,波士顿科学,马萨诸塞州Natick)在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的非劣效性。

背景

尽管药物洗脱支架的疗效已经得到充分证实,但风险效益平衡仍不理想,聚合物的安全性仍不确定。

方法

接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的新发病变患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配至 Cre8 或 Taxus Liberté 支架组。主要终点是 6 个月时非劣效性范围内的支架内晚期管腔丢失(LLL)。20%的患者进行了 6 个月的血管内超声检查。所有患者将进行 5 年的临床随访。

结果

在纳入的 323 例患者中,162 例接受 Cre8 支架治疗,161 例接受 Taxus Liberté 支架治疗。Cre8 组的支架内 LLL 明显较低(0.14±0.36mm 比 0.34±0.40mm,p 非劣效性<0.0001,p 优越性<0.0001)。两组 12 个月时的临床终点(心源性死亡、心肌梗死、靶病变血运重建和支架血栓形成)无显著差异。

结论

在新发病变中,Cre8 支架在 6 个月时的支架内 LLL 明显低于 Taxus Liberté 支架,且 12 个月时的临床安全性和疗效结果有改善趋势。(国际随机比较 DES Limus Carbostent 与 Taxus 药物洗脱支架在治疗新发冠状动脉病变中的疗效[NEXT];NCT01373502)。

相似文献

1
A multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus- with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions.多中心随机临床试验比较了在初发原生冠状动脉病变中应用 Amphilimus 与紫杉醇洗脱支架的效果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
2
Primary endpoint results of the EVOLVE trial: a randomized evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent.EVOLVE 试验的主要终点结果:一种新型可生物吸收聚合物涂层、依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的随机评估。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1362-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.016. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
3
Five-year clinical outcome of multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus - with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions.多中心随机试验比较安普利姆与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗初发原发性冠状动脉病变的五年临床结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Feb 15;301:50-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.10.058. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
4
A randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial comparing paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with plain balloon angioplasty in drug-eluting stent restenosis: the PEPCAD-DES study.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术与普通球囊血管成形术治疗药物洗脱支架再狭窄的随机、多中心、单盲临床试验:PEPCAD-DES 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1377-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
5
SPIRIT IV trial design: a large-scale randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease.SPIRIT IV试验设计:依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架用于冠心病患者的大规模随机对照比较
Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4):520-526.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.025. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
6
Comparison of dual drug-eluting Cilotax stent and paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Liberte stent in native coronary artery lesions.比较新型双药物洗脱西罗莫司涂层依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus Liberte 支架治疗冠状动脉原发病变的疗效。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 1;107(7):990-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.021. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
7
Two-year follow-up of the Genous™ endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent versus the Taxus Liberté stent in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions with a high-risk of restenosis: a randomized, single-center, pilot study.新发冠状动脉病变高危再狭窄患者中内皮祖细胞捕获支架与 Taxus Liberté 支架的两年随访:一项随机、单中心、先导研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug 1;78(2):189-95. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23143. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
8
The REMEDEE trial: a randomized comparison of a combination sirolimus-eluting endothelial progenitor cell capture stent with a paclitaxel-eluting stent.REMEDEE 试验:西罗莫司洗脱内皮祖细胞捕获支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架随机比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;6(4):334-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.018. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
9
Clinical efficacy of polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of complex, long coronary artery lesions from a multicenter, randomized trial: support for the use of drug-eluting stents in contemporary clinical practice.基于聚合物的紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗复杂长冠状动脉病变的多中心随机试验临床疗效:支持药物洗脱支架在当代临床实践中的应用
Circulation. 2005 Nov 22;112(21):3306-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.552190. Epub 2005 Nov 14.
10
Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions.评估基于聚合物的缓释和中释紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉病变有效性的随机研究。
Circulation. 2003 Aug 19;108(7):788-94. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000086926.62288.A6. Epub 2003 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cre8 Drug Eluting Stent Performance in Daily Cardiology Practice.Cre8药物洗脱支架在日常心脏病学实践中的性能
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 6;24(2):53. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2402053. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Individualizing Medicinal Therapy Post Heart Stent Implantation: Tailoring for Patient Factors.心脏支架植入术后的个体化药物治疗:根据患者因素进行调整
Cureus. 2023 Aug 23;15(8):e43977. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43977. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
无聚合物涂层与聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2023 Apr 27;15(4):e38215. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38215. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
The Use of Bioactive Polymers for Intervention and Tissue Engineering: The New Frontier for Cardiovascular Therapy.生物活性聚合物在干预和组织工程中的应用:心血管治疗的新前沿
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Jan 30;13(3):446. doi: 10.3390/polym13030446.
5
Hybrid myocardial revascularization.杂交心肌血运重建术。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;34(Suppl 3):310-320. doi: 10.1007/s12055-018-0646-y. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
6
12-Month clinical outcomes of amphilimus drug eluting stents in an all-comers South-East Asian registry.东南亚全人群登记研究中安普利莫司药物洗脱支架的12个月临床结局
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Jan 23;26:100469. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100469. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
Hybrid coronary revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of two-vessel coronary artery disease with proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis.杂交冠状动脉血运重建术与非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗双支冠状动脉疾病合并左前降支近端狭窄的比较
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jun;11(6):2402-2409. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.54.
8
Polymer-free drug-eluting stents versus permanent polymer drug-eluting stents: An updated meta-analysis.无聚合物药物洗脱支架与永久性聚合物药物洗脱支架:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(15):e15217. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015217.
9
One-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents or zotarolimus-eluting stents: A propensity-score adjusted analysis.聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱支架或佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗患者的一年临床结果:倾向评分调整分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 1;94(1):61-69. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28041. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
Polymer-free versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.冠心病患者中无聚合物与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018 Dec 11;38:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.12.003. eCollection 2019 Feb.