Breneman Alyce I, Gifford René H, Dejong Melissa D
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Jan;23(1):5-17. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.1.2.
Best practices concerning the audiological management of the child diagnosed with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) have not been definitively defined nor fully understood. One reason is that previous studies have demonstrated conflicting findings regarding the outcomes of cochlear implantation for children with ANSD. Thus, the question remains whether children with ANSD are able to achieve similar outcomes following cochlear implantation as those children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).
To assess speech perception outcomes for children with cochlear implants who have a diagnosis of ANSD as well as their age-matched peers who have sensorineural hearing loss.
Retrospective study
Thirty-five subject pairs (n = 70) ranging in age at implant activation from to 10 to 121 mo (mean 39.2 mo) were included in this retrospective study. Subjects were matched on variables including age at initial implant activation and months of implant use at postoperative test point.
Speech recognition scores for monosyllabic and multisyllabic stimuli were compared across the subject groups. For those not developmentally and/or linguistically ready for completion of open-set speech recognition testing with recorded stimuli, GASP (Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure) word recognition and/or questionnaire data using either the LittlEARS or Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale were compared across the groups. Statistical analysis using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) evaluated the effects of etiology (ANSD or SNHL) on postoperative outcomes.
The results of this study demonstrate that children with ANSD can clearly benefit from cochlear implantation and that their long-term outcomes are similar to matched peers with SNHL on measures of speech recognition. There were no significant differences across the ANSD and SNHL groups on any of the tested measures.
Cochlear implantation is a viable treatment option for children with a diagnosis of ANSD who are not making auditory progress with hearing aids that have been fit using the Desired Sensation Level method (DSL v5.0). Expected outcomes of cochlear implantation for children with ANSD, excluding children with cochlear nerve deficiency, are no different than for children with non-ANSD SNHL. These results are important for counseling families on the expected outcomes and realistic expectations following cochlear implantation for children with ANSD who demonstrate no evidence of cochlear nerve deficiency.
关于被诊断为听觉神经病谱系障碍(ANSD)儿童的听力学管理的最佳实践尚未得到明确界定,也未被完全理解。一个原因是,先前的研究在ANSD儿童人工耳蜗植入的结果方面显示出相互矛盾的发现。因此,问题仍然存在,即ANSD儿童在人工耳蜗植入后是否能够取得与感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)儿童相似的结果。
评估被诊断为ANSD的人工耳蜗植入儿童以及年龄匹配的感音神经性听力损失同伴的言语感知结果。
回顾性研究
本回顾性研究纳入了35对受试者(n = 70),植入激活时的年龄在10至121个月之间(平均39.2个月)。受试者在包括初次植入激活时的年龄和术后测试点的植入使用月数等变量上进行了匹配。
比较了各受试者组单音节和多音节刺激的言语识别分数。对于那些在发育和/或语言上尚未准备好通过录制刺激完成开放集言语识别测试的受试者,比较了各小组使用格伦多纳德听觉筛查程序(GASP)的单词识别和/或使用小耳朵量表(LittlEARS)或有意义听觉整合量表的问卷数据。使用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计分析,评估病因(ANSD或SNHL)对术后结果的影响。
本研究结果表明,ANSD儿童能够明显从人工耳蜗植入中受益,并且在言语识别测量方面,他们的长期结果与匹配的SNHL同伴相似。在任何测试测量中,ANSD组和SNHL组之间均无显著差异。
对于使用期望感觉水平方法(DSL v5.0)适配助听器但听力无进展的被诊断为ANSD的儿童,人工耳蜗植入是一种可行的治疗选择。排除耳蜗神经缺陷儿童,ANSD儿童人工耳蜗植入的预期结果与非ANSD的SNHL儿童无异。这些结果对于向家庭咨询人工耳蜗植入后ANSD儿童(无耳蜗神经缺陷证据)的预期结果和现实期望非常重要。