Suppr超能文献

旁路制剂治疗伴有抑制剂的血友病患者的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of bypassing agents in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-7273, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2012 Feb;34(2):434-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and recombinant Factor VIIa (rFVIIa) are 2 bypassing agents commonly used for treating acute bleeds in hemophiliac patients with inhibitors. A wide range of efficacy rates for aPCC and rFVIIa have been reported in a number of single-armed and randomized controlled comparative studies.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to compare the clinical efficacy of aPCC and rFVIIa using a classic meta-analytic approach and to explore the role of study characteristics as covariates in a meta-analysis of previously published clinical studies in hemophiliac patients with antibodies to the missing Factor VIII or IX.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted to identify studies on the efficacy of aPCC and rFVIIa 90 and 270 μg/kg for treating joint bleeds. The efficacy rates with aPCC and rFVIIa were pooled separately, assuming fixed or random effects. Subgroup analyses were conducted to pool the efficacy rates for bleeds evaluated at 8-12, 18-27, and 36-72 hours after the start of the initial infusion. Meta-regression was used to investigate the association between pooled efficacy rates and study characteristics.

RESULTS

Although only 2 studies directly compared the efficacy of aPCC and rFVIIa, data from ~2392 joint bleeding episodes from 19 studies were included. The pooled efficacy rates were 80.8% with aPCC and 68.4% with rFVIIa (90 μg/kg, 72.0%; 270 μg/kg, 55.7%). The pooled efficacy rates with aPCC at 8-12, 18-27, and 36-72 hours were 49.2%, 70.2%, and 90.9%, respectively. The corresponding pooled rates with rFVIIa 90 μg/kg were 66.6%, 70.7%, and 77.7%. No significant differences were found between the pooled efficacy rates with aPCC and rFVIIa overall or at any of the time points evaluated. Positive associations were found between reported efficacy and duration of follow-up and the number of bleeds evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the paucity of high-quality studies, the findings from the present review and meta-analysis suggest no conclusive evidence that aPCC or rFVIIa is significantly more efficacious than the other in the treatment of joint bleeding episodes in hemophiliac patients with inhibitors.

摘要

背景

活化的凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(aPCC)和重组因子 VIIa(rFVIIa)是两种常用于治疗有抑制剂的血友病患者急性出血的旁路药物。在一些单臂和随机对照比较研究中,报道了 aPCC 和 rFVIIa 的疗效率差异很大。

目的

本研究旨在使用经典的荟萃分析方法比较 aPCC 和 rFVIIa 的临床疗效,并探讨研究特征作为协变量在荟萃分析中对有抗体缺失 VIII 或 IX 因子的血友病患者的临床研究的作用。

方法

系统检索了关于 aPCC 和 rFVIIa 90 和 270 μg/kg 治疗关节出血疗效的研究。分别汇总 aPCC 和 rFVIIa 的疗效率,假设固定或随机效应。进行亚组分析,以汇总初始输注后 8-12、18-27 和 36-72 小时评估的出血疗效率。采用Meta 回归分析来研究汇总疗效率与研究特征之间的关系。

结果

尽管只有 2 项研究直接比较了 aPCC 和 rFVIIa 的疗效,但纳入了来自 19 项研究的约 2392 例关节出血发作的数据。aPCC 的汇总疗效率为 80.8%,rFVIIa 为 68.4%(90 μg/kg,72.0%;270 μg/kg,55.7%)。aPCC 在 8-12、18-27 和 36-72 小时的汇总疗效率分别为 49.2%、70.2%和 90.9%,相应的 rFVIIa 90 μg/kg 汇总疗效率为 66.6%、70.7%和 77.7%。总体或任何评估时间点,aPCC 和 rFVIIa 的汇总疗效率均无显著差异。报告的疗效与随访时间和评估的出血次数之间存在正相关关系。

结论

鉴于高质量研究的缺乏,本综述和荟萃分析的结果表明,没有确凿的证据表明 aPCC 或 rFVIIa 在治疗有抑制剂的血友病患者关节出血发作方面比另一种更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验