• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中剂量率腔内近距离放疗治疗宫颈癌的疗效:与低剂量率腔内近距离放疗的比较。

Treatment outcome of medium-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison with low-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Sep 1;84(1):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.066. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.066
PMID:22285665
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of medium-dose-rate (MDR) and low-dose-rate (LDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) for uterine cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We evaluated 419 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix who were treated by radical radiotherapy with curative intent at Tokyo Women's Medical University from 1969 to 1999. LDR was used from 1969 to 1986, and MDR has been used since July 1987. When compared with LDR, fraction dose was decreased and fraction size was increased (1 or 2 fractions) for MDR to make the total dose of MDR equal to that of LDR. In general, the patients received a total dose of 60 to 70 Gy at Point A with external beam radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage. In the LDR group, 32 patients had Stage I disease, 81 had Stage II, 182 had Stage III, and 29 had Stage IVA; in the MDR group, 9 patients had Stage I disease, 19 had Stage II, 55 had Stage III, and 12 had Stage IVA.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rates for Stages I, II, III, and IVA in the LDR group were 78%, 72%, 55%, and 34%, respectively. In the MDR group, the 5-year overall survival rates were 100%, 68%, 52%, and 42%, respectively. No significant statistical differences were seen between the two groups. The actuarial rates of late complications Grade 2 or greater at 5 years for the rectum, bladder, and small intestine in the LDR group were 11.1%, 5.8%, and 2.0%, respectively. The rates for the MDR group were 11.7%, 4.2%, and 2.6%, respectively, all of which were without statistical differences.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that MDR ICBT is effective, useful, and equally as good as LDR ICBT in daytime (about 5 hours) treatments of patients with cervical cancer.

摘要

目的

评估并比较中剂量率(MDR)和低剂量率(LDR)腔内近距离放疗(ICBT)治疗子宫颈癌的疗效。

方法与材料

我们评估了 1969 年至 1999 年期间在东京女子医科大学接受根治性放疗的 419 例宫颈鳞癌患者。1969 年至 1986 年使用 LDR,自 1987 年 7 月以来使用 MDR。与 LDR 相比,MDR 减少了分次剂量并增加了分次大小(1 或 2 次),以使 MDR 的总剂量与 LDR 相等。一般来说,根据国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期,患者在体外放疗联合近距离放疗时在 A 点接受 60-70Gy 的总剂量。在 LDR 组中,32 例为Ⅰ期疾病,81 例为Ⅱ期,182 例为Ⅲ期,29 例为ⅣA 期;在 MDR 组中,9 例为Ⅰ期疾病,19 例为Ⅱ期,55 例为Ⅲ期,12 例为ⅣA 期。

结果

LDR 组Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ和ⅣA 期的 5 年总生存率分别为 78%、72%、55%和 34%。MDR 组的 5 年总生存率分别为 100%、68%、52%和 42%。两组之间无显著统计学差异。LDR 组直肠、膀胱和小肠的 5 年晚期并发症≥2 级的累积发生率分别为 11.1%、5.8%和 2.0%。MDR 组分别为 11.7%、4.2%和 2.6%,均无统计学差异。

结论

这些数据表明,MDR ICBT 在治疗宫颈癌患者时,在白天(约 5 小时)治疗中是有效、有用的,与 LDR ICBT 一样好。

相似文献

1
Treatment outcome of medium-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison with low-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy.中剂量率腔内近距离放疗治疗宫颈癌的疗效:与低剂量率腔内近距离放疗的比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Sep 1;84(1):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.066. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
2
Prospective study of HDR (192Ir) versus MDR (137Cs) intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.高剂量率(192铱)与中剂量率(137铯)腔内近距离放射治疗子宫颈癌的前瞻性研究。
Brachytherapy. 2003;2(2):85-90. doi: 10.1016/S1538-4721(03)00101-6.
3
Phase III randomized trial comparing LDR and HDR brachytherapy in treatment of cervical carcinoma.比较低剂量率(LDR)和高剂量率(HDR)近距离放射疗法治疗宫颈癌的III期随机试验。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Aug 1;59(5):1424-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.034.
4
Comparison of low and high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer. Retrospective analysis of two sequential series.低剂量率与高剂量率近距离放射治疗子宫颈癌的比较。两个连续系列的回顾性分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 15;62(4):1108-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.016.
5
Prospective multi-institutional study of definitive radiotherapy with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in patients with nonbulky (<4-cm) stage I and II uterine cervical cancer (JAROG0401/JROSG04-2).前瞻性多机构研究:高剂量率腔内近距离放疗在非巨块型(<4cm)Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期子宫颈癌患者中的应用(JAROG0401/JROSG04-2)。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):e49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.022. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
6
Low-dose-rate vs. high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) experience.低剂量率与高剂量率腔内近距离放射治疗宫颈癌:阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校(UAB)的经验
Brachytherapy. 2006 Jan-Mar;5(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2005.12.001.
7
High-dose-rate brachytherapy in uterine cervical carcinoma.子宫颈癌的高剂量率近距离放射治疗
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 May 1;62(1):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.017.
8
Long-term results of high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.高剂量率腔内近距离放射治疗子宫颈鳞状细胞癌的长期结果。
Cancer. 2005 Jan 1;103(1):92-101. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20734.
9
Patterns of brachytherapy practice for patients with carcinoma of the cervix (1996-1999): a patterns of care study.宫颈癌患者近距离放射治疗实践模式(1996 - 1999年):一项医疗服务模式研究
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Nov 15;63(4):1083-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.04.035. Epub 2005 Aug 15.
10
Clinical comparison of two linear-quadratic model-based isoeffect fractionation schemes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer.基于线性二次模型的两种高剂量率腔内近距离放射治疗宫颈癌等效应分割方案的临床比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 May 1;59(1):179-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.025.