Massachusetts General Hospital, Professional Office Building 228, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 May;133(1):237-46. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1947-7.
NEWEST (Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women with Estrogen-Sensitive Tumors) is the first study to compare biological and clinical activity of fulvestrant 500 versus 250 mg in the neoadjuvant breast cancer setting. We hypothesized that fulvestrant 500 mg may be superior to 250 mg in blocking estrogen receptor (ER) signaling and growth. A multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase II study was performed to compare fulvestrant 500 mg (500 mg/month plus 500 mg on day 14 of month 1) versus fulvestrant 250 mg/month for 16 weeks prior to surgery in postmenopausal women with ER+ locally advanced breast cancer. Core biopsies at baseline, week 4, and surgery were assessed for biomarker changes. Primary endpoint: change in Ki67 labeling index (LI) from baseline to week 4 determined by automated computer imaging system (ACIS). Secondary endpoints: ER protein expression and function; progesterone receptor (PgR) expression; tumor response; tolerability. ER and PgR were examined retrospectively using the H score method. A total of 211 patients were randomized (fulvestrant 500 mg: n = 109; 250 mg: n = 102). At week 4, fulvestrant 500 mg resulted in greater reduction of Ki67 LI and ER expression versus 250 mg (-78.8 vs. -47.4% [p < 0.0001] and -25.0 vs. -13.5% [p = 0.0002], respectively [ACIS]); PgR suppression was not significantly different (-22.7 vs. -17.6; p = 0.5677). However, H score detected even greater suppression of ER (-50.3 vs. -13.7%; p < 0.0001) and greater PgR suppression (-80.5 vs. -46.3%; p = 0.0018) for fulvestrant 500 versus 250 mg. At week 16, tumor response rates were 22.9 and 20.6% for fulvestrant 500 and 250 mg, respectively, with considerable decline in all markers by both ACIS and H score. No detrimental effects on endometrial thickness or bone markers and no new safety concerns were identified. This provides the first evidence of greater biological activity for fulvestrant 500 versus 250 mg in depleting ER expression, function, and growth.
NEWEST(雌激素敏感肿瘤的新辅助内分泌治疗)是第一项比较氟维司群 500mg 与 250mg 在新辅助乳腺癌环境中生物学和临床活性的研究。我们假设氟维司群 500mg 可能优于 250mg,因为它可以阻断雌激素受体(ER)信号和生长。一项多中心、随机、开放标签、Ⅱ期研究,旨在比较氟维司群 500mg(每月 500mg 加第 1 个月第 14 天 500mg)与每月氟维司群 250mg 治疗绝经后 ER+局部晚期乳腺癌患者,在手术前 16 周。基线、第 4 周和手术时进行核心活检,评估生物标志物变化。主要终点:通过自动计算机成像系统(ACIS)从基线到第 4 周 Ki67 标记指数(LI)的变化。次要终点:ER 蛋白表达和功能;孕激素受体(PgR)表达;肿瘤反应;耐受性。使用 H 评分法回顾性检查 ER 和 PgR。共随机分配 211 例患者(氟维司群 500mg:n=109;250mg:n=102)。第 4 周时,与氟维司群 250mg 相比,氟维司群 500mg 导致 Ki67 LI 和 ER 表达的更大降低(-78.8%与-47.4%[p<0.0001]和-25.0%与-13.5%[p=0.0002],分别用 ACIS 检测;PgR 抑制无显著差异[-22.7%与-17.6%;p=0.5677])。然而,H 评分检测到氟维司群 500mg 对 ER(-50.3%与-13.7%;p<0.0001)和 PgR(-80.5%与-46.3%;p=0.0018)的抑制作用更大。第 16 周时,氟维司群 500mg 和 250mg 的肿瘤缓解率分别为 22.9%和 20.6%,所有标志物的反应都明显下降,包括 ACIS 和 H 评分。子宫内膜厚度或骨标志物无不良影响,也未发现新的安全性问题。这首次提供了氟维司群 500mg 比 250mg 在耗尽 ER 表达、功能和生长方面具有更大生物学活性的证据。