• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发器官特异性供者风险指数。

Development of organ-specific donor risk indices.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2012 Apr;18(4):395-404. doi: 10.1002/lt.23398.

DOI:10.1002/lt.23398
PMID:22287036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3332103/
Abstract

Because of the shortage of deceased donor organs, transplant centers accept organs from marginal deceased donors, including older donors. Organ-specific donor risk indices have been developed to predict graft survival with various combinations of donor and recipient characteristics. Here we review the kidney donor risk index (KDRI) and the liver donor risk index (LDRI) and compare and contrast their strengths, limitations, and potential uses. The KDRI has a potential role in developing new kidney allocation algorithms. The LDRI allows a greater appreciation of the importance of donor factors, particularly for hepatitis C virus-positive recipients; as the donor risk index increases, the rates of allograft and patient survival among these recipients decrease disproportionately. The use of livers with high donor risk indices is associated with increased hospital costs that are independent of recipient risk factors, and the transplantation of livers with high donor risk indices into patients with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores < 15 is associated with lower allograft survival; the use of the LDRI has limited this practice. Significant regional variations in donor quality, as measured by the LDRI, remain in the United States. We also review other potential indices for liver transplantation, including donor-recipient matching and the retransplant donor risk index. Although substantial progress has been made in developing donor risk indices to objectively assess donor variables that affect transplant outcomes, continued efforts are warranted to improve these indices to enhance organ allocation policies and optimize allograft survival.

摘要

由于可供移植的已故器官短缺,移植中心接受来自边缘已故供体的器官,包括年龄较大的供体。已经开发了器官特异性供体风险指数,以预测各种供体和受者特征组合的移植物存活率。在这里,我们回顾了肾脏供体风险指数(KDRI)和肝脏供体风险指数(LDRI),并比较和对比了它们的优缺点及其潜在用途。KDRI 可能在开发新的肾脏分配算法中发挥作用。LDRI 可以更好地认识到供体因素的重要性,特别是对于丙型肝炎病毒阳性受者;随着供体风险指数的增加,这些受者的移植物和患者存活率不成比例地下降。使用高供体风险指数的肝脏与增加的医院成本相关,而与受者风险因素无关,并且将高供体风险指数的肝脏移植到终末期肝病模型评分<15 的患者中与较低的移植物存活率相关;使用 LDRI 限制了这种做法。美国供体质量的显著区域差异,如 LDRI 所衡量的,仍然存在。我们还回顾了其他潜在的肝移植指数,包括供体-受者匹配和再次移植供体风险指数。尽管在开发客观评估影响移植结果的供体变量的供体风险指数方面取得了重大进展,但仍需要继续努力改进这些指数,以加强器官分配政策并优化移植物存活率。

相似文献

1
Development of organ-specific donor risk indices.开发器官特异性供者风险指数。
Liver Transpl. 2012 Apr;18(4):395-404. doi: 10.1002/lt.23398.
2
Use of Organs From Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Donors for Uninfected Recipients: A Potential Cost-Effective Approach to Save Lives?利用丙型肝炎病毒阳性供者的器官用于未感染受者:挽救生命的一种潜在具有成本效益的方法?
Transplantation. 2018 Apr;102(4):664-672. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002033.
3
Liver Transplant From Increased-Risk Donors in the Era of Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C.丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒药物时代的高危供肝肝移植。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2020 Oct;18(5):605-611. doi: 10.6002/ect.2019.0065. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
4
Effect of Elderly Donors on Long-Term Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.老年供体对肝移植长期预后的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2025 Feb;23(2):120-132. doi: 10.6002/ect.2024.0241.
5
Impact of Combinations of Donor and Recipient Ages and Other Factors on Kidney Graft Outcomes.供者和受者年龄组合及其他因素对肾脏移植物结局的影响。
Front Immunol. 2020 May 22;11:954. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00954. eCollection 2020.
6
External validation of the US and UK kidney donor risk indices for deceased donor kidney transplant survival in the Australian and New Zealand population.美国和英国的供体风险指数在澳大利亚和新西兰人群中对死亡供体肾移植存活率的外部验证。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Dec 1;34(12):2127-2131. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz090.
7
Impact of center volume on outcomes of increased-risk liver transplants.中心容积对高危肝移植结局的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Oct;17(10):1191-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.22343.
8
Characteristics and Performance of Unilateral Kidney Transplants from Deceased Donors.从已故供体获取的单侧肾脏移植的特征和表现。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Jan 6;13(1):118-127. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06550617. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
9
Drowned Kidney and Liver Donors Demonstrate No Difference in Mortality and Graft Failure Compared With the 4 Most Common Extrinsic Causes of Donor Deaths.溺水死亡的肾和肝供体与最常见的4种供体死亡外在原因相比,在死亡率和移植物失败方面并无差异。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2024 Dec;22(12):900-907. doi: 10.6002/ect.2024.0294.
10
Liver Transplantation of HCV-viremic Donors Into HCV-negative Recipients in the United States: Increasing Frequency With Profound Geographic Variation.美国 HCV 病毒血症供体向 HCV 阴性受者进行肝移植:频率增加,地域差异显著。
Transplantation. 2021 Jun 1;105(6):1285-1290. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003382.

引用本文的文献

1
Canadian Anatomic Kidney Score: Quantitative Macroscopic Assessment of Donor Kidney Quality for Transplantation.加拿大解剖学肾脏评分:供体肾脏移植质量的宏观定量评估
Transplant Direct. 2024 Mar 7;10(4):e1604. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001604. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
The utility of machine learning for predicting donor discard in abdominal transplantation.机器学习在预测腹部移植中供者淘汰的应用。
Clin Transplant. 2023 May;37(5):e14951. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14951. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
3
Reduction in Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Survival Following Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Direct-acting Antiviral Era.直接作用抗病毒药物时代肝移植治疗肝细胞癌后生存的种族和民族差异减少。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;21(9):2288-2297.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.11.038. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Liver Transplantation in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯肝脏移植临床实践指南。
Saudi Med J. 2021 Sep;42(9):927-968. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.9.20210126.
5
Kidney Donor Profile Index Is a Reliable Alternative to Liver Donor Risk Index in Quantifying Graft Quality in Liver Transplantation.肾供体特征指数是肝移植中量化移植物质量时肝供体风险指数的可靠替代指标。
Transplant Direct. 2019 Nov 25;5(12):e511. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000955. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Using machine learning to estimate survival curves for patients receiving an increased risk for disease transmission heart, liver, or lung versus waiting for a standard organ.使用机器学习来估计接受疾病传播风险增加的心脏、肝脏或肺的患者与等待标准器官的患者的生存曲线。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;21(6):e13181. doi: 10.1111/tid.13181. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
SIMULTANEOUS LIVER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION IN LIVER TRANSPLANT CANDIDATES WITH RENAL DYSFUNCTION: IMPORTANCE OF CREATININE LEVELS, DIALYSIS, AND ORGAN QUALITY IN SURVIVAL.肾功能不全的肝移植候选者的肝肾联合移植:肌酐水平、透析及器官质量对生存的重要性
Kidney Int Rep. 2016 Nov;1(4):221-229. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Tacrolimus versus Ciclosporin as Primary Immunosuppression After Liver Transplant.肝移植后他克莫司与环孢素作为初始免疫抑制治疗的系统评价和Meta分析
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 3;11(11):e0160421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160421. eCollection 2016.
9
Liver transplant recipients with portal vein thrombosis receiving an organ from a high-risk donor are at an increased risk for graft loss due to hepatic artery thrombosis.接受来自高风险供体器官的门静脉血栓形成的肝移植受者,因肝动脉血栓形成导致移植物丢失的风险增加。
Transpl Int. 2016 Dec;29(12):1286-1295. doi: 10.1111/tri.12855. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
10
Changes in Discard Rate After the Introduction of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI).肾脏捐赠者特征指数(KDPI)引入后弃用率的变化。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Jul;16(7):2202-7. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13769. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the center on graft failure after liver transplantation.中心对肝移植后移植物失败的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2013 Sep;19(9):957-64. doi: 10.1002/lt.23685. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
2
Effect of centre volume and high donor risk index on liver allograft survival.中心体积和高供体风险指数对肝移植存活的影响。
HPB (Oxford). 2011 Jul;13(7):447-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00320.x. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
3
Impact of center volume on outcomes of increased-risk liver transplants.中心容积对高危肝移植结局的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Oct;17(10):1191-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.22343.
4
Longer-term outcomes after kidney transplantation from seronegative deceased donors at increased risk for blood-borne viral infection.血清阴性的已故供体肾移植受者在增加血源病毒感染风险下的长期预后。
Transplantation. 2011 Jun 15;91(11):1211-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318218d59a.
5
Variation in organ quality between liver transplant centers.不同肝移植中心间的器官质量差异。
Am J Transplant. 2011 May;11(5):958-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03487.x. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
6
A revised model for end-stage liver disease optimizes prediction of mortality among patients awaiting liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型修订版优化了肝移植等待患者死亡率的预测。
Gastroenterology. 2011 Jun;140(7):1952-60. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.017. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
7
Identification of new donor variables associated with graft survival in a single-center liver transplant cohort.鉴定与单中心肝移植队列中移植物存活相关的新供者变量。
Liver Transpl. 2010 Dec;16(12):1393-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.22176.
8
Race and receipt of liver transplantation: location matters.种族与肝移植的接受情况:地理位置很重要。
Liver Transpl. 2010 Sep;16(9):1009-12. doi: 10.1002/lt.22123.
9
A critical analysis of liver allograft utilization from the US deceased donor pool.对美国已故供体库中肝脏移植利用情况的批判性分析。
Liver Transpl. 2010 May;16(5):543-7. doi: 10.1002/lt.22040.
10
Liver transplantation in the United States, 1999-2008.美国 1999-2008 年的肝移植情况。
Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr;10(4 Pt 2):1003-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03037.x.