Management Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011 Oct;31(5):311-8.
The aim of the study consists in a systematic review concerning the economic evaluation of cochlear implant (CI) in children by searching the main international clinical and economic electronic databases. All primary studies published in English from January 2000 to May 2010 were included. The types of studies selected concerned partial economic evaluation, including direct and indirect costs of cochlear implantation; complete economic evaluation, including minimization of costs, cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), cost-utility analysis (CUA) and cost-benefit analysis (CBA) performed through observational and experimental studies. A total of 68 articles were obtained from the database research. Of these, 54 did not meet the inclusion criteria and were eliminated. After reading the abstracts of the 14 articles selected, 11 were considered eligible. The articles were then read in full text. Furthermore, 5 articles identified by bibliography research were added manually. After reading 16 of the selected articles, 9 were included in the review. With regard to the studies included, countries examined, objectives, study design, methodology, prospect of analysis adopted, temporal horizon, the cost categories analyzed strongly differ from one study to another. Cost analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis and an analysis of educational costs associated with cochlear implants were performed. Regarding the cost analysis, only two articles reported both direct cost and indirect costs. The direct cost ranged between € 39,507 and € 68,235 (2011 values). The studies related to cost-effectiveness analysis were not easily comparable: one study reported a cost per QALY ranging between $ 5197 and $ 9209; another referred a cost of $ 2154 for QALY if benefits were not discounted, and $ 16,546 if discounted. Educational costs are significant, and increase with the level of hearing loss and type of school attended. This systematic review shows that the healthcare costs are high, but savings in terms of indirect and quality of life costs are also significant. Cochlear implantation in a paediatric age is cost-effective. The exiguity and heterogeneity of studies did not allow detailed comparative analysis of the studies included in the review.
本研究旨在通过检索主要的国际临床和经济电子数据库,对儿童人工耳蜗植入(CI)的经济评估进行系统评价。纳入 2000 年 1 月至 2010 年 5 月发表的所有英文原始研究。选择的研究类型包括:部分经济评价,包括人工耳蜗植入的直接和间接成本;完全经济评价,包括成本最小化、成本效益分析(CEA)、成本效用分析(CUA)和成本效益分析(CBA),这些研究通过观察性和实验性研究进行。从数据库研究中获得了 68 篇文章。其中,54 篇不符合纳入标准被排除。在阅读了 14 篇选定文章的摘要后,又有 11 篇被认为符合条件。然后全文阅读了这些文章。此外,还通过文献研究手工添加了 5 篇文章。在阅读了 16 篇选定文章后,有 9 篇被纳入综述。关于纳入的研究,检查的国家、目标、研究设计、方法学、分析采用的展望、时间范围,分析的成本类别在不同的研究中差异很大。进行了成本分析、成本效益分析和与人工耳蜗植入相关的教育成本分析。关于成本分析,只有两篇文章报告了直接成本和间接成本。直接成本范围在 39507 欧元至 68235 欧元(2011 年)之间。与成本效益分析相关的研究不太容易比较:一项研究报告了每 QALY 的成本在 5197 美元至 9209 美元之间;另一项研究提到,如果不贴现效益,每 QALY 的成本为 2154 美元,如果贴现效益,每 QALY 的成本为 16546 美元。教育成本是巨大的,并且随着听力损失程度和所上学校类型的增加而增加。这项系统评价表明,医疗保健成本很高,但间接成本和生活质量成本的节约也很显著。儿童时期的人工耳蜗植入是具有成本效益的。研究的稀缺性和异质性使得无法对综述中纳入的研究进行详细的比较分析。