University of Southern California Division of Neonatal Medicine, LAC+USC Medical Center and Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Early Hum Dev. 2012 Jul;88(7):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.12.031. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
To test the hypothesis that term-born Asian infants, at reduced risk to die of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) exhibit a circadian heart rate rhythm (CHR) at a later age than non-Asian term infants.
Repeated overnight heart rate (HR) traces obtained with a battery-operated Polar S810i heart-rate monitor at home in 17 Asian Torajan infants in Indonesia, were compared with those of 52 non-Asian infants monitored as part of the Collaborative Home Infant Monitoring Evaluation (CHIME). HR was determined using a moving window averaging technique. A comparison of median HR during quiet sleep (QS) episodes (identified by minimum HR variability), established the presence of CHR.
Seventy three percent of non-Asian CHIME infants ≤7 weeks exhibited CHR compared to 45% of Asian Torajan infants. Between 8 and 12 weeks, 94% of non-Asian CHIME infants exhibited CHR, compared to 33% of Asian Torajan infants (p<0.001). Forty seven and 56% of Asian Torajan infants exhibited the CHR at the age intervals of 16-20 weeks and 21-25 weeks respectively. Active wakefulness percentages as a function of the entire recording and median QS HR were not significantly different in the two groups.
Despite the fact that Asian Torajan infants were on average a week older than non-Asian CHIME babies, between two and three months of age only one in three exhibited the CHR, compared to virtually all non-Asian CHIME infants. We speculate that the cause of this difference rests in the infants' environment rather than their genetic origin.
检验这样一个假设,即患有婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)风险较低的足月出生的亚洲婴儿,其昼夜心率节律(CHR)出现的时间晚于非亚洲足月出生的婴儿。
对在印度尼西亚的 17 名亚洲托拉詹婴儿进行了家庭式的、使用电池驱动的 Polar S810i 心率监测器进行的多次夜间心率(HR)跟踪,这些婴儿与作为合作式家庭婴儿监测评估(CHIME)一部分而接受监测的 52 名非亚洲婴儿的 HR 数据进行了对比。使用移动窗口平均技术确定 HR。通过最小 HR 变异性确定安静睡眠(QS)期间的 HR 中位数,以确定是否存在 CHR。
与亚洲托拉詹婴儿相比,≤7 周的非亚洲 CHIME 婴儿中 73%表现出 CHR,而亚洲托拉詹婴儿中仅有 45%表现出 CHR。在 8 至 12 周期间,94%的非亚洲 CHIME 婴儿表现出 CHR,而亚洲托拉詹婴儿中仅有 33%表现出 CHR(p<0.001)。47%和 56%的亚洲托拉詹婴儿分别在 16-20 周和 21-25 周的年龄间隔内表现出 CHR。两组之间,整个记录的活跃觉醒百分比和 QS HR 的中位数没有显著差异。
尽管亚洲托拉詹婴儿的平均年龄比非亚洲 CHIME 婴儿大一周,但在 2 至 3 个月大时,只有三分之一的婴儿表现出 CHR,而几乎所有非亚洲 CHIME 婴儿都表现出 CHR。我们推测造成这种差异的原因在于婴儿所处的环境,而不是他们的遗传起源。