Guntheroth Warren G, Spiers Philip S
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195-6320, USA.
Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):e64. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.e64.
Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) victims were regarded as normal as a matter of definition (Beckwith 1970) until 1952 when Kinney and colleagues argued for elimination of the clause, "unexpected by history." They argued that "not all SIDS victims were normal," and referred to their hypothesis that SIDS results from brain abnormalities, which they postulated "to originate in utero and lead to sudden death during a vulnerable postnatal period." Bergman (1970) argued that SIDS did not depend on any "single characteristic that ordains a infant for death," but on an interaction of risk factors with variable probabilities. Wedgwood (1972) agreed and grouped risk factors into the first "triple risk hypothesis" consisting of general vulnerability, age-specific risks, and precipitating factors. Raring (1975), based on a bell-shaped curve of age of death (log-transformed), concluded that SIDS was a random process with multifactorial causation. Rognum and Saugstad (1993) developed a "fatal triangle" in 1993, with groupings similar to those of Wedgwood, but included mucosal immunity under a vulnerable developmental stage of the infant. Filiano and Kinney (1994) presented the best known triple risk hypothesis and emphasized prenatal injury of the brainstem. They added a qualifier, "in at least a subset of SIDS," but, the National Institute of Child Health and Development SIDS Strategic Plan 2000, quoting Kinney's work, states unequivocally that "SIDS is a developmental disorder. Its origins are during fetal development." Except for the emphasis on prenatal origin, all 3 triple risk hypotheses are similar. Interest in the brainstem of SIDS victims began with Naeye's 1976 report of astrogliosis in 50% of all victims. He concluded that these changes were caused by hypoxia and were not the cause of SIDS. He noted an absence of astrogliosis in some older SIDS victims, compatible with a single, terminal episode of hypoxia without previous hypoxic episodes, prenatal or postnatal. Kinney and colleagues (1983) reported gliosis in 22% of their SIDS victims. Subsequently, they instituted studies of neurotransmitter systems in the brainstem, particularly the muscarinic (1995) and serotenergic systems (2001). The major issue is when did the brainstem abnormalities, astrogliosis, or neurotransmitter changes occur and whether either is specific to SIDS. There is no published method known to us of determining the time of origin of these markers except that the injury causing astrogliosis must have occurred at least 4 days before death (Del Bigio and Becker, 1994). Because the changes in neurotransmitter systems found in the arcuate nucleus in SIDS victims were also found in the chronic controls with known hypoxia, specificity of these markers for SIDS has not been established. It seems likely that the "acute control" group of Kinney et al (1995) died too quickly to develop gliosis or severe depletion of the neurotransmitter systems. We can conclude that the acute controls had no previous episodes of severe hypoxia, unlike SIDS or their "chronic controls." Although the average muscarinic cholinergic receptor level in the SIDS victim was significantly less than in the acute controls, the difference was only 27%, and only 21 of 41 SIDS victims had values below the mean of the acute controls. The study of the medullary serotonergic network by Kinney et al (2001) revealed greater reductions in the SIDS victims than in acute controls, but the questions of cause versus effect of the abnormalities, and whether they occurred prenatally or postnatally, remain unanswered. Hypoplasia of the arcuate nucleus was stated to occur in 5% of their SIDS cases by Kinney et al (2001), but this is a "primary developmental defect" according to Matturri et al (2002) with a larger series, many of whom were stillbirths. These cases should not be included under the rubric of SIDS, by definition. There are difficulties with Filiano and Kinney's (1994) explanation of the age at death distribution of SIDS. They postulate that the period between 1 and 6 months represents an unstable time for virtually all physiologic systems. However, this period demonstrates much less instability than does the neonatal period, when most deaths from congenital defects and severe maternal anemia occur. We present data for infants born to mothers who were likely to have suffered severe anemia as a consequence of placenta previa, abruptio placentae, and excessive bleeding during pregnancy; these infants presumably are at increased risk of hypoxia and brainstem injury. The total neonatal mortality rate in these 3 groups of infants is 4 times greater than the respective postneonatal mortality, and in the postneonatal period the non-SIDS mortality rate is between 14 and 22 times greater than the postneonatal SIDS rate in these 3 groups. A preponderance of deaths in the neonatal period is also found for congenital anomalies, a category that logically should include infants who experienced prenatal hypoxia or ischemia; this distribution of age of death is very different from that for SIDS, which mostly spares the first month and peaks between 2 and 3 months of age. Finally, evidence inconsistent with prenatal injury as a frequent cause of SIDS comes from prospective studies of ventilatory control in neonates who subsequently died of SIDS; no significant respiratory abnormalities in these infants have been found (Waggener et al 1990; Schectman et al 1991). We conclude that none of the triple risk hypotheses presented so far have significantly improved our understanding of the cause of SIDS. Bergman's and Raring's concepts of multifactorial causation with interaction of risk factors with variable probabilities is less restrictive and more in keeping with the large number of demonstrated risk factors and their varying prevalence. If prenatal hypoxic damage of the brainstem occurred, it seems likely that the infant so afflicted would be at risk for SIDS, but it is even more likely that their death would occur in the neonatal period, as we have demonstrated in infants who have known maternal risk factors that involve severe anemia. This is in contrast to the delay until the postneonatal period of most SIDS deaths. A categorical statement that the origin of SIDS is prenatal is unwarranted by the evidence. Brainstem abnormalities have not been shown to cause SIDS, but are more likely a nonspecific effect of hypoxia.
直到1952年,金尼及其同事主张删除“根据病史无法预料”这一条款之前,婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)受害者在定义上被视为正常(贝克威思,1970年)。他们认为“并非所有SIDS受害者都是正常的”,并提及他们的假设,即SIDS是由脑部异常导致的,他们推测这种异常“起源于子宫内,并在出生后的脆弱时期导致猝死”。伯格曼(1970年)认为,SIDS并不取决于“任何注定婴儿死亡的单一特征”,而是取决于风险因素与不同概率的相互作用。韦奇伍德(1972年)表示赞同,并将风险因素归为首个“三重风险假说”,该假说由一般易感性、特定年龄风险和诱发因素组成。拉林(1975年)基于死亡年龄的钟形曲线(对数转换)得出结论,SIDS是一个由多因素导致的随机过程。罗格努姆和索格斯塔德(1993年)在1993年提出了一个“致命三角”,其分组与韦奇伍德的类似,但在婴儿脆弱的发育阶段下纳入了黏膜免疫。菲利阿诺和金尼(1994年)提出了最著名的三重风险假说,并强调脑干的产前损伤。他们补充了一个限定词,“至少在一部分SIDS病例中”,但是,2000年美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所的SIDS战略计划引用金尼的研究成果,明确指出“SIDS是一种发育障碍。其起源于胎儿发育阶段”。除了强调产前起源外,所有这三种三重风险假说都很相似。对SIDS受害者脑干的关注始于奈伊1976年的报告,该报告称所有受害者中有50%存在星形胶质细胞增生。他得出结论,这些变化是由缺氧引起的,并非SIDS的病因。他指出,一些年龄较大的SIDS受害者没有星形胶质细胞增生,这与单一的、终末期的缺氧情况相符,且此前没有产前或产后的缺氧发作。金尼及其同事(1983年)报告称,他们的SIDS受害者中有22%存在胶质细胞增生。随后,他们对脑干中的神经递质系统进行了研究,特别是毒蕈碱能(1995年)和5-羟色胺能系统(2001年)。主要问题在于脑干异常、星形胶质细胞增生或神经递质变化是何时发生的,以及它们是否是SIDS所特有的。据我们所知,除了导致星形胶质细胞增生的损伤必须在死亡前至少4天发生外(德尔·比焦和贝克尔,1994年),尚无已发表的确定这些标志物起源时间的方法。由于在SIDS受害者弓状核中发现的神经递质系统变化也在已知缺氧的慢性对照中被发现,因此这些标志物对SIDS的特异性尚未确定。金尼等人(1995年)的“急性对照”组似乎死亡太快,以至于无法发展为胶质细胞增生或神经递质系统的严重耗竭。我们可以得出结论,急性对照组此前没有严重缺氧发作,这与SIDS或其“慢性对照”不同。尽管SIDS受害者的平均毒蕈碱胆碱能受体水平明显低于急性对照组,但差异仅为27%,且41名SIDS受害者中只有21人的值低于急性对照组的平均值。金尼等人(2001年)对延髓5-羟色胺能网络的研究表明,SIDS受害者的减少程度比急性对照组更大,但异常的因果关系问题以及它们是产前还是产后发生的问题仍未得到解答。金尼等人(2001年)称,他们的SIDS病例中有5%发生了弓状核发育不全,但根据马图里等人(2002年)更大样本量的研究,这是一种“原发性发育缺陷”,其中许多是死产。根据定义,这些病例不应归入SIDS类别。菲利阿诺和金尼(1994年)对SIDS死亡年龄分布的解释存在困难。他们推测,1至6个月的时期对几乎所有生理系统来说都是一个不稳定的时期。然而,这一时期的不稳定性远低于新生儿期,新生儿期大多数死亡是由先天性缺陷和严重母体贫血导致的。我们提供了因前置胎盘、胎盘早剥和孕期出血过多而可能患有严重贫血的母亲所生婴儿的数据;这些婴儿可能面临更高的缺氧和脑干损伤风险。这三组婴儿的新生儿总死亡率是各自新生儿后期死亡率的4倍,在新生儿后期,这三组的非SIDS死亡率比新生儿SIDS死亡率高14至22倍。先天性异常在新生儿期的死亡中也占很大比例,从逻辑上讲,这一类别应包括经历过产前缺氧或缺血的婴儿;这种死亡年龄分布与SIDS非常不同,SIDS大多不会影响第一个月,而是在2至3个月大时达到峰值。最后,来自对随后死于SIDS的新生儿通气控制的前瞻性研究的证据与产前损伤是SIDS常见原因的观点不一致;在这些婴儿中未发现明显的呼吸异常(瓦格纳等人,1990年;谢克特曼等人,1991年)。我们得出结论,迄今为止提出的任何三重风险假说都没有显著提高我们对SIDS病因的理解。伯格曼和拉林的多因素因果关系概念,即风险因素与不同概率的相互作用,限制较少,更符合大量已证实的风险因素及其不同的患病率。如果脑干发生了产前缺氧损伤,那么如此患病的婴儿似乎有患SIDS的风险,但更有可能在新生儿期死亡,正如我们在已知有涉及严重贫血的母体风险因素的婴儿中所证明的那样。这与大多数SIDS死亡延迟到新生儿后期形成对比。现有证据无法证实SIDS起源于产前这一绝对说法。脑干异常尚未被证明会导致SIDS,但更可能是缺氧的非特异性效应。