Hepatic Hemodynamic Laboratory, Liver Unit, Institut de Malalties Digestives i Metaboliques, Hospital Clínic-Institut de Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jul;10(7):776-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent event in patients with cirrhosis; it can be treated with anticoagulants, but there are limited data regarding safety and efficacy of this approach. We evaluated this therapy in a large series of patients with cirrhosis and non-neoplastic PVT.
We analyzed data from 55 patients with cirrhosis and PVT, diagnosed from June 2003 to September 2010, who received anticoagulant therapy for acute or subacute thrombosis (n = 31) or progression of previously known PVT (n = 24). Patients with cavernomatous transformation were excluded. Thrombosis was diagnosed, and recanalization was evaluated by using Doppler ultrasound, angio-computed tomography, and/or angio-magnetic resonance imaging analyses.
Partial or complete recanalization was achieved in 33 patients (60%; complete in 25). Early initiation of anticoagulation was the only factor significantly associated with recanalization. Rethrombosis after complete recanalization occurred in 38.5% of patients after anticoagulation therapy was stopped. Despite similar baseline characteristics, patients who achieved recanalization developed less frequent liver-related events (portal hypertension-related bleeding, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy) during the follow-up period, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .1). Five patients developed bleeding complications that were probably related to anticoagulation. A platelet count <50 × 109/L was the only factor significantly associated with higher risk for experiencing a bleeding complication. There were no deaths related to anticoagulation therapy.
Anticoagulation is a relatively safe treatment that leads to partial or complete recanalization of the portal venous axis in 60% of patients with cirrhosis and PVT; it should be maintained indefinitely to prevent rethrombosis.
门静脉血栓形成(PVT)是肝硬化患者的常见事件;它可以用抗凝剂治疗,但关于这种方法的安全性和疗效的数据有限。我们在一系列患有肝硬化和非肿瘤性 PVT 的患者中评估了这种治疗方法。
我们分析了 2003 年 6 月至 2010 年 9 月期间接受抗凝治疗的 55 例肝硬化合并 PVT 患者的数据,这些患者的 PVT 为急性或亚急性血栓形成(n=31)或先前已知的 PVT 进展(n=24)。排除海绵状转化的患者。通过多普勒超声、血管计算机断层扫描和/或血管磁共振成像分析诊断血栓形成,并评估再通情况。
33 例患者(60%)实现了部分或完全再通(完全再通 25 例)。抗凝治疗开始时间是唯一与再通显著相关的因素。完全再通后停止抗凝治疗的患者中有 38.5%发生再血栓形成。尽管基线特征相似,但在随访期间,实现再通的患者发生与肝脏相关的事件(门静脉高压相关出血、腹水或肝性脑病)的频率较低,但这一差异无统计学意义(P=0.1)。有 5 例患者发生可能与抗凝相关的出血并发症。血小板计数<50×109/L 是发生出血并发症风险较高的唯一因素。没有与抗凝治疗相关的死亡。
抗凝是一种相对安全的治疗方法,可使 60%的肝硬化合并 PVT 患者的门静脉轴实现部分或完全再通;应无限期维持抗凝治疗以预防再血栓形成。