• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

值得承担的风险:不和谐的男同性恋伴侣之间的安全协议

Risks worth taking: safety agreements among discordant gay couples.

作者信息

Beougher Sean C, Chakravarty Deepalika, Garcia Carla C, Darbes Lynae A, Neilands Torsten B, Hoff Colleen C

机构信息

Center for Research on Gender and Sexuality, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Care. 2012;24(9):1071-7. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.648603. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1080/09540121.2011.648603
PMID:22292838
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3342469/
Abstract

As HIV research and prevention efforts increasingly target gay men in relationships, situational factors such as couple serostatus and agreements about sex become central to examinations of risk. Discordant gay couples are of particular interest because the risk of HIV infection is seemingly near-at-hand. Yet, little is known about their sexual behaviors, agreements about sex, and safer sex efforts. The present study utilized longitudinal semi-structured, qualitative interviews to explore these issues among 12 discordant couples. Findings show that nearly every couple had agreements about reducing the likelihood of HIV transmission from one partner to the other. Negotiating these agreements involved establishing a level of acceptable risk, determining condom use, and employing other risk-reduction techniques, such as seropositioning and withdrawal. For half of the couples, these agreements did not involve using condoms; only two couples reported consistent condom use. Despite forgoing condoms, however, none reported seroconversion over the course of data collection. Additional issues are raised where long-term HIV prevention is concerned. Future prevention efforts with discordant couples should work with, rather than fight against, the couple's decision to use condoms and endeavor to complement and accentuate their other safer sex efforts.

摘要

随着艾滋病病毒(HIV)研究和预防工作越来越多地将目标对准处于恋爱关系中的男同性恋者,诸如伴侣血清学状态及性方面的约定等情境因素,成为了风险评估的核心内容。血清学不一致的男同性恋伴侣尤其值得关注,因为HIV感染风险似乎近在眼前。然而,对于他们的性行为、性方面的约定以及安全性行为举措,人们却知之甚少。本研究采用纵向半结构化定性访谈,对12对血清学不一致的伴侣之间的这些问题展开了探究。研究结果显示,几乎每对伴侣都就降低一方将HIV传染给另一方的可能性达成了约定。协商这些约定涉及确定可接受的风险水平、决定是否使用避孕套以及采用其他降低风险的技巧,例如血清学体位法和体外射精。对于半数伴侣而言,这些约定并不涉及使用避孕套;只有两对伴侣报告称始终坚持使用避孕套。然而,尽管未使用避孕套,但在数据收集期间,没有一对报告血清转化情况。在长期HIV预防方面还引发了其他问题。未来针对血清学不一致伴侣的预防工作,应该顺应而非对抗伴侣使用避孕套的决定,并努力补充和强化他们的其他安全性行为举措。

相似文献

1
Risks worth taking: safety agreements among discordant gay couples.值得承担的风险:不和谐的男同性恋伴侣之间的安全协议
AIDS Care. 2012;24(9):1071-7. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.648603. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
2
Relationship characteristics and motivations behind agreements among gay male couples: differences by agreement type and couple serostatus.男同性恋伴侣之间协议的关系特征及背后的动机:因协议类型和伴侣血清学状态而异
AIDS Care. 2010 Jul;22(7):827-35. doi: 10.1080/09540120903443384.
3
Relationship Power, Sociodemographics, and Their Relative Influence on Sexual Agreements Among Gay Male Couples.关系权力、社会人口统计学因素及其对男同性恋伴侣间性协议的相对影响。
AIDS Behav. 2016 Jun;20(6):1302-14. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1196-6.
4
Relationship dynamics as predictors of broken agreements about outside sexual partners: implications for HIV prevention among gay couples.关系动态作为预测违反有关外部性伴侣协议的指标:对男同性恋伴侣中 HIV 预防的启示。
AIDS Behav. 2012 Aug;16(6):1584-8. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-0074-0.
5
Serostatus differences and agreements about sex with outside partners among gay male couples.男同性恋伴侣之间血清学状态差异以及与外部伴侣发生性行为的共识
AIDS Educ Prev. 2009 Feb;21(1):25-38. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2009.21.1.25.
6
Sexual agreements among gay male couples.男同性恋伴侣之间的性行为协议。
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Jun;39(3):774-87. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9393-2. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
7
Dyadic Qualitative Analysis of Condom Use Scripts Among Emerging Adult Gay Male Couples.新兴成年男同性恋伴侣避孕套使用脚本的对偶定性分析。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2018 Apr 3;44(3):269-280. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2017.1359713. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
8
HIV-discordant and concordant HIV-positive male couples' recommendations for how an eHealth HIV prevention toolkit for concordant HIV-negative male couples could be improved to meet their specific needs.HIV抗体不一致和一致的HIV阳性男性伴侣对于如何改进针对抗体一致的HIV阴性男性伴侣的电子健康HIV预防工具包以满足他们的特定需求所提出的建议。
AIDS Care. 2018 Jun;30(sup2):54-60. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1465527. Epub 2018 May 30.
9
How Do Gay Serodiscordant Couples in Sydney, Australia Negotiate Undetectable Viral Load for HIV Prevention?澳大利亚悉尼的男同性恋 HIV 血清不一致的伴侣如何协商达到 HIV 预防的不可检测病毒载量?
AIDS Behav. 2018 Dec;22(12):3981-3990. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2247-6.
10
Sexual risk for HIV among gay male couples: a longitudinal study of the impact of relationship dynamics.男同性恋伴侣中的 HIV 性风险:关系动态影响的纵向研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Jan;43(1):47-60. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0206-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Contextualized Experiences and Predictors of Condom Use in a Flemish Population: A Mixed Methods Study.弗拉芒人群中情境化的避孕套使用经历及预测因素:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 21;21(12):1545. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121545.
2
Use of "Strengthening Our Vows" Video Intervention to Encourage Negotiated Explicit Sexual Agreements in Zambian Heterosexual HIV Seroconcordant-Negative Couples.使用“加强我们的誓言”视频干预措施,鼓励赞比亚异性 HIV 血清阴性的性伴侣之间协商达成明确的性协议。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Aug;52(6):2649-2667. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02590-x. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
3
Condom-Related Stigma Scale among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: Development and Psychometric Tests.中国男男性行为人群中与安全套相关的耻辱感量表的编制及心理测量学评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4779. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064779.
4
Condom stigma among men who have sex with men population: Concept synthesis.男男性行为人群中避孕套污名:概念综合。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Jun 28;47(6):771-779. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210575.
5
Assessing Self-Efficacy and Communication Regarding Sexual Agreements among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the USA: Development and Validation of Two Novel Scales.评估美国男男性行为者的性行为协议自我效能感和沟通:两个新量表的开发和验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 15;18(18):9727. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189727.
6
Communication Patterns Among Male Couples with Open and Monogamous Agreements.男同性恋伴侣中开放式和一夫一妻制协议的沟通模式。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 May;50(4):1419-1431. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01821-9. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
Sexual Agreements and Intimate Partner Violence Among Male Couples in the U.S.: An Analysis of Dyadic Data.美国男同性恋伴侣中的性协议与亲密伴侣暴力:对偶数据的分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Apr;50(3):1087-1105. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01783-y. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
8
"Am I gonna get in trouble for acknowledging my will to be safe?": Identifying the experiences of young sexual minority men and substance use in the context of an opioid overdose crisis.“承认我对安全的渴望会给我带来麻烦吗?”:识别年轻性少数男性在阿片类药物过量危机背景下的经历与物质使用情况。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Mar 30;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00365-4.
9
"Condoms are … like public transit. It's something you want everyone else to take": Perceptions and use of condoms among HIV negative gay men in Vancouver, Canada in the era of biomedical and seroadaptive prevention."避孕套就像公共交通工具。这是你希望其他人都使用的东西":在加拿大温哥华,生物医学和血清适应预防时代,艾滋病毒阴性男同性恋者对避孕套的看法和使用情况。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6452-7.
10
Sexual behavior and HIV risk among age-discrepant, same-sex male couples.年龄差异较大的男同性恋伴侣中的性行为与感染艾滋病毒风险
Cult Health Sex. 2016 Dec;18(12):1319-1332. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2016.1183824. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Rates of condom and non-condom-based anal intercourse practices among homosexually active men in Australia: deliberate HIV risk reduction?澳大利亚男同性恋活跃人群中基于避孕套和非避孕套的肛交行为发生率:刻意降低艾滋病病毒感染风险?
Sex Transm Infect. 2011 Oct;87(6):489-93. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050041. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
2
Partner-provided social support influences choice of risk reduction strategies in gay male couples.伴侣提供的社会支持会影响男同性恋伴侣选择风险降低策略。
AIDS Behav. 2012 Jan;16(1):159-67. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9868-8.
3
Changing patterns of sexual risk behavior among London gay men: 1998-2008.伦敦男同性恋者性行为风险模式的变化:1998-2008 年。
Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Mar;38(3):221-9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181f2ebe1.
4
Reflections on the Swiss Consensus Statement in the context of qualitative interviews with heterosexuals living with HIV.
AIDS Care. 2010 Dec;22(12):1487-92. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.482122.
5
Estimating the risk of HIV transmission from homosexual men receiving treatment to their HIV-uninfected partners.估算接受治疗的同性恋男性向其 HIV 阴性伴侣传播 HIV 的风险。
Sex Transm Infect. 2011 Feb;87(1):17-21. doi: 10.1136/sti.2010.042622. Epub 2010 Jul 18.
6
Relationship characteristics and motivations behind agreements among gay male couples: differences by agreement type and couple serostatus.男同性恋伴侣之间协议的关系特征及背后的动机:因协议类型和伴侣血清学状态而异
AIDS Care. 2010 Jul;22(7):827-35. doi: 10.1080/09540120903443384.
7
Treatment to prevent transmission of HIV-1.预防 HIV-1 传播的治疗方法。
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 May 15;50 Suppl 3(0 3):S85-95. doi: 10.1086/651478.
8
The effect of HIV-discordance on the sexual lives of gay and bisexual men in Mexico City.HIV 不一致对墨西哥城男同性恋和双性恋男性性生活的影响。
J Homosex. 2010;57(1):54-70. doi: 10.1080/00918360903445855.
9
Masculinity and relationship agreements among male same-sex couples.男男性行为者的男子气概和伴侣关系协议。
J Sex Res. 2010 Sep;47(5):460-70. doi: 10.1080/00224490903100587.
10
Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities.估算美国五个城市中男男性行为者主要性伴侣之间艾滋病毒传播的比例。
AIDS. 2009 Jun 1;23(9):1153-62. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832baa34.